MIKE TAYLOR is correct in stating fair notice was given regarding the increase in pension age for women (HAS, Nov 29).
He is also correct in that if a woman married in the 1970s she could opt out and pay a reduced National Insurance contribution.
I married in the 1970s but decided to continue to pay a full contribution, knowing full well that I would not receive a full pension if I opted for the reduced rate.
Why these women were “shocked” is a complete mystery to me.
They stated it had not been pointed out to them – rubbish.
It was made perfectly clear at the time not only would they receive a reduced pension but would also not receive the then maternity grant.
In my opinion, they wanted their cake and to eat it and kicked up such a fuss they achieved their aim, whereas I and many others paid the full contribution and are no better off.
If anybody should be compensated it is us.
Linda Hodgson, Peterlee
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel