ENGLISH cricket’s potentially- damaging rift at the top is unlikely to be resolved until Thursday at the earliest.

That is when captain Kevin Pietersen, whose working relationship with coach Peter Moores appears to have broken down just five months into the job, returns from holiday.

Separate talks between Hugh Morris, managing director of England cricket, and Pietersen and Moores took place yesterday – but the situation is likely to need face-toface meetings.

The England and Wales Cricket Board (ECB) refuses to put a timescale on a resolution, but time is of the essence with a tour of the Caribbean little more than a fortnight away.

Pietersen has said that the situation is not healthy and that “everybody has to have the same aims and pull in the same direction for the sake of the England team”.

Should the board side with Pietersen, as some eminent former players are predicting, it would arguably make him England’s most powerful captain in history.

No one has previously been able to dictate who should or should not coach the national team.

Mick Newell, who as director of cricket at Nottinghamshire has first-hand experience of Pietersen and supported his promotion when Michael Vaughan resigned in late summer, said: “You want to be backing the captain, but you set a very dangerous precedent if you over-rule the coach to give the captain what he wants.

“It would be better to get an agreement between them and get on with it, but it being in the public domain now makes that more difficult.

“It’s Hugh Morris’ job to mediate in all this. But with the stage which this is at, there does not appear much way back.

“Kevin is our best player by a long way, not only the captain, so it’s a very difficult situation.

“We have had things like this at county level several times in the past few years, but never at the very top.”

The dynamic in running the national team is unworkable because of a clash of beliefs – and Pietersen had a veiled dig recently, when he said the players would be resting up more this winter and concentrating on cricket-specific practice.

Moores’ successful stint at Sussex was due to a hardwork and fitness philosophy, ideally suited to the slog of 16 county championship matches in four months.

In direct contrast to predecessor Duncan Fletcher, he is also big on player statistics.

But his record in 20 months as coach of England – four Test series defeats out of four against top-six opposition – has left his methods vulnerable to questioning.

“There is a certain type of person that Kevin would respect as a coach,” Newell continued.

“You either need to have a lot of international experience, or you’re looking for a former great cricketer.

“The captain-coach relationship in cricket is quite a lot more important than in most other team sports. I think you’ve got a whole respect issue going on.”

If the impasse remains and the ECB back Pietersen by paying off Moores, they will have to do so in the confidence that he will be the man to lead England in the long term.

If the board remains unconvinced of his ability to do so, he may get a rap over the knuckles and a return to the ranks – but former chairman of selectors Ray Illingworth has predicted the 28-year-old will win his power struggle.

It was predecessor Michael Vaughan’s omission from the 16-man squad to take on West Indies next month which led to reports that Pietersen had issued an ultimatum, demanding the ICB sack Moores or risk losing him as captain.

“The captain should have the main say,” Illingworth, a successful England captain himself, told Sky Sports News.