News RSS Feed Send your news, pictures & videos


£210m - the cost of smoking in the North-East

New figures show that smoking costs the North-East £210m a year New figures show that smoking costs the North-East £210m a year

SHOCKING new figures show that smoking costs the North-East £210m a year.

The statistics from Fresh – in partnership with Brunel University – reveal for the first time the toll smoking inflicts in terms of lives lost, illness and the resulting cost to the NHS, local authorities and private business.

Despite the North-East seeing the biggest fall in smoking in England over the past few years, smoking- related diseases still cost the NHS in the region about £105m every year.

This includes £53m spent on more than 27,000 smoking-related hospital admissions each year alone. The remainder is the cost of outpatient appointments, GP consultations, prescription costs and nurse consultations.

Smoking is also estimated to cost employers in the North-East about £70m a year, with 335,000 days lost each year to absenteeism due to smoking, plus the cost of smoking breaks.

Passive smoking also costs the North-East about £35.9m a year, with the biggest burden falling on children exposed to secondhand smoke.

Shockingly, nearly one in five of all deaths among adults over 35 are as a result of smoking, causing about 4,211 deaths in the region each year.

Smoking causes nearly 90 per cent of deaths from lung cancer, about 89 per cent from chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and about 17 per cent from heart disease.

The research is disputed by smokers’ group Forest, which instead points to the contribution they make to the economy through taxes. However, experts have calculated that if smoking rates remain at the current level, more than 94,000 people in the North-East a year will develop related illnesses.

Ailsa Rutter, director of Fresh, the UK’s first dedicated regional programme for tobacco control, said: “These are very stark figures that really help to demonstrate the scale of the problem that smoking causes. The North-East has had the highest drop in smoking nationwide, but we still need to do more when smoking causes such incredible damage to families and communities.”

The Brunel University academics have calculated that the presence of a regional tobacco programme in the North-East, headed by Fresh, will save £92m in costs to the NHS and workplaces in the next two years and encourage nearly 19,000 additional smokers to quit smoking.

Simon Clarke, director of Forest, said he was “very sceptical” about the figures.

“There is no hard evidence for this and smokers make a massive contribution to the economy.

The tax that smokers pay far outweighs the alleged cost of treating smokingrelated disease and it is unfair to single out smokers who are often very valuable employees,” he said.

Comments(6)

chas says...
11:54am Thu 2 Feb 12

If everybody stopped smoking the Government would loose about 12 billion pounds.

marma495 says...
3:15pm Thu 2 Feb 12

I expect that similar" shocking figures" will be rolled out in other parts of the UK.
Perhaps in the interests of balance, the editor should be asking a few more questions.
How much of taxpayers money has been used to fund these tobacco control organisations?
How many people have developed stress related illnesses entirely due to the smoking ban.
How many people who have allegedly stopped smoking, have now started again?
How much does it cost taxpayers to make one smoker into an ex- smoker?
How much has it cost the country in lost revenue for each and every pub that has closed due to the smoking ban?
How much tax is put into the treasury by smokers?
How many of these heart attacks that are mentioned are in people over 70 years old?
How many are in people over 80 years old?
How do you distinguish whether a heart attack/ stroke/ cancer ect is caused solely on smoking, rather than alcohol/ pollution/ stress/ obesity or a combination of various factors?
And finally, is there another tobacco consultation coming up requiring this organisation to be asking for public support?

james291 says...
7:26pm Thu 2 Feb 12

Smokers bring more than £11bn of revenue to government each year. The smoking ban causing the closure of more than 10,000 pubs with a collective loss of more than 100,000 jobs costs around £200 for every household in country.
Publishing these figures under the heading smoking related doesn't mean anything at all; when the main cause of someones illness could have been down to obesity or alcohol. It makes no sense to lump them together just because someone smoked.
I am disgusted at The Echo for producing such scaremongering and propoganda they must think Joe public is stupid.
It is the unelected anti smoking organisations such as Get Fresh that are costing the country billions that is the real drain on the public purse.

james291 says...
7:26pm Thu 2 Feb 12

Smokers bring more than £11bn of revenue to government each year. The smoking ban causing the closure of more than 10,000 pubs with a collective loss of more than 100,000 jobs costs around £200 for every household in country.
Publishing these figures under the heading smoking related doesn't mean anything at all; when the main cause of someones illness could have been down to obesity or alcohol. It makes no sense to lump them together just because someone smoked.
I am disgusted at The Echo for producing such scaremongering and propoganda they must think Joe public is stupid.
It is the unelected anti smoking organisations such as Get Fresh that are costing the country billions that is the real drain on the public purse.

Chris F J Cyrnik says...
7:58pm Thu 2 Feb 12

You bet your boots there’s another so called public consultation coming down the sewer pipe, and of course it won’t be questioned in any meaningful way, because its outcome has already been rubber stamped, even Deborah Arnott of ASH says as much.

The problem you see with public consultations…is that they aren’t public consultations at all, no, they’re public sector consultations, and therein lies the difference…and this difference is all the difference in the world.

This means that the government will simply be asking itself, through quango’s set up with taxpayers money whether the taxpayer likes it or not.

So, for example if you ask (remember the clue is in the title) Smokefree Northwest, if the smoking ban is a good idea, how likely would they be to say no – and guess what, that carries some 39,000 votes.

Remember when 25,000 retailers were supposedly asked for their opinion during the last so called consultation, but their responses were magically air-brushed from the final 700 page report.

I wonder how members of the actual joe-public were ever asked – I just bet it was absolutely zero, since no reference was ever made to the general public in the finished report.


Do you really think you live in a democracy – keep dreaming.

JayJ says...
4:37pm Fri 3 Feb 12

Another cut and paste job - and from the Health Editor, no less from whom readers might, not unreasonably, expect some critical evaluation. Are there any investigative journalists any more or are journalists reporting on smoking forbidden from criticising the tobacco control lobby's specious findings - or is the Northern Echo just a rag? it's left to a commenter, 'Marma', above, to highlight some questions that really should be asked.

click2find

Most popular


About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree