News RSS Feed Send your news, pictures & videos


Cleveland Police criticised for cost of service

A POLICE force has been criticised for spending £25,000 on a survey measuring residents’ confidence in it, The Northern Echo can reveal.

Cleveland Police – which is grappling with budget cuts of £17m over the next two years – said the survey by SPA Future Thinking was about measuring confidence in the force, as well as asking people about any issues or concerns they had about local policing in order to make improvements.

But Steve Matthews, chairman of the Cleveland branch of the Police Federation, said the survey, jointly commissioned with the police authority, was “unnecessary”.

A spokeswoman for the force – also facing mounting costs from an anti-corruption inquiry into some of its senior officers – confirmed the survey would cost £25,944 over the course of a year.

A newly-qualified police constable, having completed their initial training, receives a salary of £25,962.

PC Matthews said Cleveland Police’s private sector partner Steria already operated a “ring back” system for victims of crime or those who had complained about a specific incident to determine whether they were satisfied with the response received.

“In these times of austerity, this does seem a little bit unnecessary.

“There are other ways of measuring police confidence without having to spend this sort of money on random calls to the public.”

One resident, who was called to take part in the survey, said: “We must have had up to 30 missed calls from the same number. When we did speak to them we said we weren’t interested in taking part, but someone then mistakenly called back again the following day.”

In a statement, the police authority said the survey costs, previously funded by the Government, had to be seen against its £130m annual budget.

The statement said: “When Government funding ended, the force and authority took the decision to continue conducting the surveys because we felt it important to ensure that we had a clear picture of the issues and concerns of the public in order to meet the needs of our local communities.

“This has been a very worthwhile exercise, providing a great deal of valuable information which helps to shape our policing priorities.”

SPA Future Thinking, an independent market research company with offices in the UK, France and Italy, boasts of major “blue chip” clients including British Gas, HM Revenue and Customs, Lloyds TSB and Mercedes Benz.

Comments(5)

st-george1 says...
9:04am Fri 11 Nov 11

All previous mystery surveys showed high confidence rates in Cleveland Police … they, the Force keep telling us !
Another highly expensive market research company questioned 1200 selected residents out of 454,800 aged 16 to 24 years in Teesside = less than 0.2%, that’s 1 in every 422 on average, between April to September last year.
It found that 1076 of the 1200 surveyed said they were "very" or "fairly" confident with the force's ability to deal with local problems …that’s 1 in every 422 on average, with the remaining 453,714 = 99.7% of residents having either disagreed or were excluded from the survey
Its no different to the unions saying 80% of members want to strike when in fact only 20% voted so the manipulated result is meaningless, is it not ?

Donalds says...
8:49pm Fri 11 Nov 11

Body cameras AND polygraph programs. Not only on hire, but every 5yrs and for internal affairs investigations. If officers knew that this investigative tool was in place, maybe they would think twice before breaking the very laws they are sworn to uphold.
If the local level can't or won't see that corruption on any level has become our biggest National Security threat, then the higher level of government should step in and change policies and laws for them.
DHS expanding polygraph program to fight corruption of CBP agents. http://t.co/fMENr6o

bingbong says...
11:10pm Sat 12 Nov 11

st-george1 wrote:
All previous mystery surveys showed high confidence rates in Cleveland Police … they, the Force keep telling us ! Another highly expensive market research company questioned 1200 selected residents out of 454,800 aged 16 to 24 years in Teesside = less than 0.2%, that’s 1 in every 422 on average, between April to September last year. It found that 1076 of the 1200 surveyed said they were "very" or "fairly" confident with the force's ability to deal with local problems …that’s 1 in every 422 on average, with the remaining 453,714 = 99.7% of residents having either disagreed or were excluded from the survey Its no different to the unions saying 80% of members want to strike when in fact only 20% voted so the manipulated result is meaningless, is it not ?
st-george, I think you've demostrated a severe case of "foot in mouth". Why don't you apply your perverse logic to the last General Election? Look at the total turnout across the country and look at the Tory vote among that turnout. I think you'll find (based on your strange logic) that more that 75 % of the people didn't want a Tory government. Does that mean the General Election result that elected your beloved Tories was also meanlingless?? According to the argument you've put forward it does!

st-george1 says...
6:12pm Sun 13 Nov 11

whatever bingbong says ... ?
usual Labour flavoured lies and rubbish comes to mind here ... Totally missed the point of my post, votes and surveys are different ....
General elections is about winning SEATS ...
Using survey results based on minimum distorted data is to confuse and hope people will believe !
Freedom of expression is available to all not just to the Rupert Bear’s ...

bingbong says...
8:52pm Sun 13 Nov 11

st-george1 wrote:
whatever bingbong says ... ? usual Labour flavoured lies and rubbish comes to mind here ... Totally missed the point of my post, votes and surveys are different .... General elections is about winning SEATS ... Using survey results based on minimum distorted data is to confuse and hope people will believe ! Freedom of expression is available to all not just to the Rupert Bear’s ...
Good to see you've responded with a well thought out and reasoned comment st-george1........oh no, hang on a minute, you've just been your usual self and gone on an anti-Labour rant with anyone who dares to offer an alternative opinion to you. Well done!

click2find

Most popular


About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree