News RSS Feed Send your news, pictures & videos


'Use it or lose it' - Durham Tees Valley airport warning

LOSING MONEY: Durham Tees Valley Airport. LOSING MONEY: Durham Tees Valley Airport.

THE man tasked with securing the future of troubled Durham Tees Valley (DTV) airport has issued a stark call for the region to “use or risk losing” the facility.

Craig Richmond, chief executive of Peel Airports Limited, admitted in an exclusive interview with The Northern Echo that DTV continued to lose money and passengers.

The Canadian said he was hopeful the airport would survive, but he added that business was tough and the parent company could not prop up DTV long-term.

He said: “It’s not a pleasant situation to be in. Certainly it’s not a situation that can continue indefinitely.

“I don’t know what the time frame is, but eventually if it can’t turnaround, something’s going to change.”

Mr Richmond, who took over the running of Peel in June last year, when Vancouver Airport Services bought a 65 per cent stake in the company, rejected claims that the owners were not working hard enough to secure new routes and airlines.

“I see letters sometimes where there is an inference we want it to shut or that we don’t care – nothing can be further from the truth.

Craig Richmond

He said: “I see letters sometimes where there is an inference we want it to shut or that we don’t care – nothing can be further from the truth.

“I have three airports and the other two airports have six million passengers, yet I spend half my time on Durham Tees Valley thinking what we can do.”

Peel also owns Liverpool John Lennon Airport and Robin Hood Airport Doncaster Sheffield.

DTV has been dealt a succession of blows in recent years, which have seen passenger numbers fall from about 650,000 in 2008 to predictions of only 200,000 this year.

The biggest setback came in 2009 when bmi baby cancelled three daily flights to Heathrow, Flyglobespan and Thomson cancelled their flights and Ryanair axed its service to Dublin.

The airport still offers regular services to Aberdeen, Southampton and Schiphol, in Holland, as well as seasonal charter flights to countries including Spain, Italy, Bulgaria and Egypt.

Mr Richmond is hopeful of securing a new service later this year after lengthy talks with unnamed airlines, but he stressed that the airport needed the region’s support to show carriers they could prosper at DTV.

“What makes it easy for me to sell, and for my marketing team to sell the airport to airlines is when airplanes are flying full. This is an absolute case of use it or lose it.”

Finding a replacement for airport director Mike Morton, who left the company last month, is a high priority for the company, according to Mr Richmond.

However, changing the name back to Teesside Airport – as called for by Stockton South MP James Wharton – was not an immediate concern, he said.

Comments(47)

Kinninvie says...
9:15am Fri 5 Aug 11

If planes went where people wanted to go it would make a big difference.
I used to go from DTV to Dublin 5 times a year but the flights stopped.
There are thousands of people in the region who go to Corfu every season but we have to go to Newcastle because DTV dont have flights.

stevegg says...
9:37am Fri 5 Aug 11

Its a catch 22 situation. The airport needs more customers and business to survive but the latter wont fly from DTV as the airport has to few airlines and destinations to attract them. People are voting with their feet. The 1st move will have to be made by the management in attracting new operators to fly to desirable destinations!

Jolly Roger says...
9:46am Fri 5 Aug 11

The first thing the owners should do is change the name back to Teesside as this is the na,e most know it by.

Then get destinations where people want to go and London is one of them.

And do the owners still charge passengers for using the airport if so get rid of it pronto as people don't like paying extra just to use the airport rather travel a bit further for a cheaper place to fly from.

If the owners got the people interested in the place first then they might start making money,

Dean M says...
10:16am Fri 5 Aug 11

Agree with the comments so far (although I don't really care about the name).
.
A limited number of unpopular destinations to fly to, and a tax levy for walking through the airport, just doesn't add up to attracting customers. Passengers are already being hammered by our government with disgraceful levels of Air Passenger Duty Tax (APDT), and if Scotland, Wales and NI are allowed to decide their own APDT in their airports (as I read the other day) then flights (long haul flights in particular) will be hammered further in England.
.
All northern England passengers will be on a cheap train to Glasgow airport! And who can blame them?

darlolady says...
10:42am Fri 5 Aug 11

I live close to the airport and would love to use it more for obvious reasons but the flights from there are so limited. I looked for a flight the other day to travel from one uk destination to another from both Durham Tess Valley and Newcastle there was a £100 difference I rest my case! Do they seriously think people wouldnt use it if there was more flights and they were in par with the rest of the airports moneywise when it is on our doorstep? Get more flights in and lower the price and see what happens? I have only used it once and have quite often had to travel to manchester or newcastle I know which one I would prefer to use if I had the option :(

Jaga says...
10:43am Fri 5 Aug 11

DTV is my airport of choice for medium and long haul. Why pay a fortune to travel to Heathrow, Gatwick, Manchester, Glasgow etc.? KLM to Shciphol, and then on. No lugging around of luggage on trains & underground – it’s checked through. No ridiculously expensive train and TfL fares.

Travel agents in the region could and should do a lot more to help the airport. They could provide muscle to get more holiday flights from there, thus saving their customers hassle and money.

I for one would miss DTV.

jabdc5, the land that's still trying to recover from the last tory government. says...
10:51am Fri 5 Aug 11

For many destinations it is far cheaper to pay train fair to London and fly from Heathrow than pay high prices at DTV plus their stupid passenger tax.Even short haul, the Amsterdam route is a classic example £140 from DTV ( plus passenger tax) around £70 from most other airports.

DCC Public Enemy No 1 says...
11:04am Fri 5 Aug 11

Why not change the name to "James Cook or Vic or Vic Reeve's Airport" something that will get it noticed, only joking call it what ever you wish, people ain't going to use it because of a name. Perhaps better deals, facilities for travellers and free car parking might be a good place to start, instead of ripping everyone off! Perhaps they could highlight the lack of custom controls at the airport, this would no doubt appeal to the regions baccy smugglers? Perhaps future strategy should not be so ambitious that it makes the airport owners look silly when promised operators or freight facilities fail to materialise as promised. Perhaps it is just down to over capacity in the region, although many people do travel by taxi to Manchester. Lack of investment and infrastructure at the airport has been the biggest failure, along with councils being involved and poor management from day one!

oldgit57 says...
12:24pm Fri 5 Aug 11

I agree with most of the coments I don,t think the name is anything to do with DTV's plight its just a lack of flights to destinations people want to go to. Now stop whining about lack of use and get out there and attract business from major companies by offerring better rates. The survival of DTV depends on the management attracting business and a portfolio of holiday destinations. I am sure most people like me only use an airport for holidays. I am sorry to say I dont want to go to Shciphol. I will always look for the local airport when booking a holiday but gess what is available Newcastle, Leeds Bradford, Manchester or Glasgow with no flights from DTV.

timm says...
12:36pm Fri 5 Aug 11

Get Teesside Airport back, get rid of the comedy-named airport it is now. It sounds like a theme park, seriously. Totally out of kilter, when you are in an overseas airport, and you see "Durham Tees Valley" on the screens. Other airport just sound more solid. The airport went into a tailspin when Teesside was lost. Get the name back, do it now, and you will soar.

Dean M says...
12:54pm Fri 5 Aug 11

timm wrote:
Get Teesside Airport back, get rid of the comedy-named airport it is now. It sounds like a theme park, seriously. Totally out of kilter, when you are in an overseas airport, and you see "Durham Tees Valley" on the screens. Other airport just sound more solid. The airport went into a tailspin when Teesside was lost. Get the name back, do it now, and you will soar.
Nah, totally disagree. The name doesn't matter. If it's competitive and offers good services then it can do well; they could call it John Lennon, Robin Hood, Elvis Presley or whatever, and it would still thrive.

wizziewig says...
1:23pm Fri 5 Aug 11

I agree most of the comments, but does it matter what it’s called.
Newcastle is also struggling, blame it on the tour operators next year 2012 summer season Newcastle only have 2 long haul destinations, even some of the European flights have been cut. Until they can convince the operators to use the airport they are doomed, I would prefer to fly from our local airports it is more convenient a and cheaper than having to travel. Even after tour oprators surcharges.
wizzie

BB Darlington says...
2:14pm Fri 5 Aug 11

Really really want to use Teesside airport or Durham Tees Valley airport when I go on holiday. At only a few minutes drive away it is perfect provided that you want a sunshine holiday in Majorca.
Please try harder to make this airport successful

kinsarvik says...
2:55pm Fri 5 Aug 11

I would rather use TEESSIDE airport (DTV Sounds a bit like an acronym for deep vain thrombosis)If they put on more flights.I agree with the other comments.It is up to the airport management to provide destinations people want and at the right price and abolish the airport tax.

viccarlton says...
2:56pm Fri 5 Aug 11

Most of the comments so far are spot on (apart from changing the name back, irrellevant imo) provide what people want/need and people will use it.
More destinations at reasonable prices and you'll be needing to extend from one portakabin to two.

kendizx9r says...
3:16pm Fri 5 Aug 11

let it close as know one obviously uses it, then we could make it into a motor racing circuit and dont worry people you can still call it what you want but it will be better than what it is today> a waste of space

hogman says...
3:19pm Fri 5 Aug 11

The Management must look for destinations the public want, I live in Darlington but have to travel to Newcastle or Manchester for the holidays i want to go to. So come on and give us more choice.

Quakerz says...
3:37pm Fri 5 Aug 11

Just looked for prices for next year for Majorca on the Thomas Cook site, tried searching for DTV flights - NOTHING. If I want to fly local it's either Newcastle or Leeds/Bradford, end of.

Use it or lose it they say - well provide some services that people could use and it'd be a good start.

crookmackem says...
4:19pm Fri 5 Aug 11

I wish they would change the name back as I'm fed up with people quibbling over the name of it when the real issue is the use of the airport (or lack of it as this is the case).
If the name Durham offends some Teessiders so much, I suppose I can understand as I'd be offended if someone called me a Teessider...

Kinninvie says...
5:02pm Fri 5 Aug 11

Teesside has a history of stupid names.
I mean,why call an area Teesdale when there is over 1000 square miles called Teesdale that starts less than 15 miles away..
I dont think the name change will make any difference to the airport,its simply that you can only fly from there if there is a flight going where you want to go and the choice is currently extremely limited.
I used to be able to get a flight to Dublin Monday lunchtime,have a night out in Dublin, and be back home for Tuesday afternoon.

always right says...
5:34pm Fri 5 Aug 11

I told you lot ages ago that this useless tin pot so called airport would close soon. good riddance to bad rubbish i say. oh and goodbye to the scummy customs and rude staff too. Im always right i am !.

quakers1 says...
5:40pm Fri 5 Aug 11

As most people have already said, if you got the right destinations people would use (DTVA) i used the Malaga service 5 times a year, now its leeds or Newcastle, so stop blaming us reduce your landing fees & airlines might come!!!

PaulMJohnson says...
5:50pm Fri 5 Aug 11

The name doesn't make the slightest bit of difference to people who travel regularly, and they are the life blood of an airport.

The problem is the lack of flights into any useful hubs, with the exception of Schipol.

DTV needs to do whatever it can to get flights to Heathrow back. At least then you can use DTV as the starting point to get pretty much anywhere.

assasin420 says...
5:57pm Fri 5 Aug 11

I live in Darlo so would love to fly from Teesside/DTV but as stated the destinations are so restricted. I have to ask though:

Why have the airlines pulled out?
Why are they charging the £6 to use it?
Why is Newcastle so much better and popular?

It just seems to me they appear to be throwing themselves on their own sword. If this continues passenger flights will cease within 2 years.

always right says...
6:14pm Fri 5 Aug 11

Oh,,and i also used this airport 6 times a year to malaga. it was diobolical even then,,its a total no hoper with its no hoper staff and even bigger no hoper managers. its far more pleasant to go to newcastle and call in greggs for a coffee and paste at a good price !. unlike rip off canteen at teeside. Ill be very happy to see it shut,,thats a fact.

myecho says...
6:17pm Fri 5 Aug 11

Pointless flying to anywhere in UK now, when it is probably quicker by rail - what with security checks & long check-in times, airport fees & taxes. Need to concentrate on gaps in the market - advantages over Manchester & Newcastle. I support free parking as a good start.

oliviaden6 says...
6:36pm Fri 5 Aug 11

As much as i would like to support DTV airport i believe that it is a lost cause. I used to use it every six to eight weeks to fly to and from Heathrow. I can no longer do that and there seems to be little or no will to entice other airlines to use this excellent facility. What i cant understand when BMI were there i always found that the flights were fully booked. Surely this says something for the airport and its location. Not every one wants to go to Newcastle and have a long trek back to Tees valley area. I for one would use it willingly if it had a Heathrow link, is there not enough businesses in the area that would use it for business travel/links around the globe. You say that you get the impression that you do not want to close, get off your rear ends get out there and drum up the business earn your fat salaries support the North East properly.

DarloJon says...
6:48pm Fri 5 Aug 11

It is not rocket-science. People will use it if there are routes to where people want to go. As a frequent business flyer, I have to go up to NCL as DTV/Teesside does not have anything to Bristol, Dublin, London, Gatwick, Glasgow, Isle of Man , Newquay, Plymouth let alone anywhere foreign. Schipol is great as it is a hub and KLM must realise the value of such a feeder route to keep it going. Ask industry where they want to go, even look at the existing routes which are being supported by businesses so no surprise that Oil & Gas people want to go to Aberdeen. Orange have a massive site in Bristol and lots of staff have to go up to NCL to catch easyjet down to Bristol. By the time you do that you may as well take the train. What happened to Paris, Barcelona? Tourist routes are icing on the cake, but even then it is easier to go via Schipol than Heathrow. As for the insult of paying an extra £6 to use the terminal,YOU MUST BE JOKING! Get the likes of Ryanair / Jet2 / easyjet and offer them a decent landing fee and they will come, then people will have the choice at the right price and will use the place (again). There are at least 400,000 who can't fly to where they want to go.

moxie34th says...
6:48pm Fri 5 Aug 11

It's a simpleas this - look in any local Travel agent window - hardly any holidays advertised from OUR own airport ... there are supposed to be more people in Teesside area than up in Northumberland ( newcastle) ... so WHERE are the flights ? ! Who wants to ahve to travel 45 miles North foe an airport ? Or travel all the way over to Manchester , or down to London ? With HOURS of pre-booking in times imposed ( security -wise) ? I think it's a regional 'plan' to make Newcastle the ONLY regional airport , has been from 1964 . I don't care who's behind it , but I reckon that's always been the criterea . The name of the airport itself is a bit of a no-go one, a stupid one at that , but us customers have no say in it, as usual . Give us the flights Mr Director , and we'll certainly use it. We can't use what's not on offer !

onlinereader says...
7:56pm Fri 5 Aug 11

It's a shorter journey and cheaper in taxi fare for me to use DTV than having to travel to Newcastle. I'd love to use DTV more, but their destinations are limited....... Cyprus for one!.... sort yourselves out DTV and change the bloody stupid name back to Teeside, that's what everyone knows it by

grumpy_____ says...
9:50pm Fri 5 Aug 11

Much has been said already, but here is the truth of it...
Naming the airport DVT or Teeside can only be effective if it is properly marketed alongside a cost structure that can support it. Clearly, both the airlines and passengers are voting with their feet when they go elsewhere. When will the management wake up and realise it is their efforts - not the efforts of local travel agents, councils, etc as they claim - that will determine if this airport can survive commercially. AND that will be down to attracting passengers and airlines flying to destinations they want to go to. i.e. get the prices down and get rid of ridiculous add on charges. Provide decent passenger food and accomdation during the inevitable wait for takeoff and stop treating the passenger as a cash cow who is forced to pay exorbitant prices for mediocre service within the terminal. then business may well increase. Holiday flights cannot be the answer; they only occur part of the year. Regular schedule flights to recognised hubs are the answer. That will only occur when Peel airports cut their landing charges.
The answer lies with them and they need to get the act working. I don't see it happening when their local management team are leaving to go elsewhere.
So stop the winge and get your arse in gear.

gramps427 says...
10:47pm Fri 5 Aug 11

Does Craig Richards work for Peel or Vancouver Airports? If its Peel then he should realise that their web site clearly states its main aim as making the North West its biggest airport! What this airport, this region needs is an airport that connects it to the Global Economy, efforts over the years included the odd flt to Canada which had to land either at Shannon or Prestwick to fuel up for the journey. Both Peel and Vancouver seem to like airports that are around 2000 metres. If they want to make money they need to build a second runway thats at least 11,000ft to enable long haul flights to use the airport. They need to link it to the railway connection so people landing here can reach all parts of the country within a couple of hours; and they need a terminal that is light and airey unlike the depressing tomb that makes people miserable when working there or waiting to travel. Peel were allowed to buy the airport because they said they would invest in its future; what they have done is kill what could have helped this region attract new business. Perhaps they should sell their stake to the man who has bought Northumbrian Water, Mr Li Ka shing, he already has a number of airports in his port folio as well as Felixstow Port; he sounds like a man who makes things work.

onerydoory says...
12:53am Sat 6 Aug 11

arrive as requested 2 hours before flight .
everyone booked in in 25 minutes .
booking in staff close up and disappear till next book in in 1 hour and 35 mins .
sit around for almost the time it takes to get to majorca !
its not bloody gatwick why 2 hours ?

darlolady says...
7:46am Sat 6 Aug 11

Maybe its in the pipeline to close anyhow and its easier for them to justify why its closing by blaming the public for not using it, these people work in mysterious ways.... surely if they have a business head most comments above they will have surely thought themselves??
I think the name of the airport is neither here nor there thats not what it was about? lol
The saying people with brains have no common sense maybe its that simple :D

tzy says...
7:59am Sat 6 Aug 11

my family always chose to use this airport over the years,its quick and convienent to get to for us.but there is only 1 flight destination with thomson to majorca,,and thomascook dont at all.that leaves no choice to use newcastle,,i would use dtv if there was some destinations to go to.you cant blame the public you have to blame yourselves.its like morrisons food store only selling 1 item in total in their grocery department,,,we wouldnt use it would we......

Teesborn says...
10:04am Sat 6 Aug 11

The reality is that in the long term the north east does not need another airport alongside Leeds and Newcastle.

Environmentally, rail should be the emphasis for UK travel - the region would be better off ensuing that Darlington gets a high speed rail service for the long term both to replace UK internal flights and provide easy connections to major airports.

Rail travel is far more pleasant, convenient, safer and often faster than flying short haul. The problem at the moment is that it is often too expensive. Perhaps that could be rectified if DTV was closed and resources focussed on rail.

David Lacey says...
1:31pm Sat 6 Aug 11

Not in 100 years will the North East get high speed rail. It is simply not in the plan which sees the trains switch to the old network north of Leeds. The best hope we have is for the trans-Pennine route to be electrified so that we can get to Manchester airport in 2 hours or less. DTV is doomed. Close it now.

cavogreco says...
3:33pm Sat 6 Aug 11

It's time that Peel did something to attract airlines. It seems that many of the flights we used to have now fly out of Robin Hood Airport instead - Warsaw with Wizzair, Tunisia with Thomson, Cyprus with Thomson, to name but three. Now if you want to fly abroad from Teesside, it's KLM or very little else. If they can get the flights into Robin Hood, what are they doing differently with our local airport?

keithpowles1 says...
4:38pm Sat 6 Aug 11

I havnt used DTV airport for many years. I am off to Amsterdam in September and thought 'nice one i'll travel from my local airport as Amsterdam is one of the only destinations it goes to'.

After using the KLM website I found that Leeds/Bradford flights to Amsterdam nearly half the price of DTV. When I calculated petrol and carparking, its still around £20 cheaper for a weekend away! So guess what? I'm flying from an airport around 70 miles away!! Its crazy!!

DTV need to search for competition for cheaper domestic flights. They also need to survey the local population for popular destinations. I know for a fact that the routes that were taken away from DTV were the most popular: Heathrow and Dublin. They are our starting points. NOT LOOKING FOR NEW DESTINATIONS as the Director of the company is trying to do. We need to do all we can to re-gain these routes. Then build upon that!!! Its simple mathmatics!!!

keithpowles1 says...
6:41pm Sat 6 Aug 11

One other thing...I hope Craig Richard reads all these comments. You need to listen to the needs of your airports community. In my job if I don't meet the needs of my clients I am not performing in my role. Do all you can to meet our needs, no matter what it costs as you will reap the benefits gauranteed. I have been passionate about my local airport for 30 years now but for the first time ever I don't care, but I know my community cares. Finally, yes change the airport back to Teesside, I have not read any comment saying keep the name, just comments about not changing the name. Does that say something....youre not listening to your communty! Thats where you are going wrong. Listen to us and meet our needs and we will have an airport, don't listen to us and it will close. Its all in your hands Mr. Richard not ours!!!

Redcar Red says...
6:58pm Sat 6 Aug 11

As someone who regularly uses and supports this Airport by using it 10 to 15 times a year minimum I can testify that the staff there are neither rude nor unsociable. The owners however have not done this Airport any favours. The dubious name was the start of the downfall, coincidental perhaps but it showed a lack of understanding of the region and its target customer base. I used to be able to previously testify to low parking fees and travel time convenience to my Employers but Parking charges have soared added to the Passenger fee and the generally higher costs of equivalent flights to Amsterdam and Aberdeen compared with Newcastle. From a purely Commercial perspective it is now becoming very difficult for me justifying using it to my Finance people for much longer. Throw in the lack of available destinations and it is difficult to imagine how we are supposed to actually "use it". Use it for what and to where exactly? Unless Aberdeen and Amsterdam are of value to you then it is useless to the Holiday brigade and other Business users. The abject failure of the Management of this Airport is the sole cause of its decline not the absent passengers. With the rapid growth of Budget Airlines in the last decade notoriously picking smaller lower cost "near to" but not "main Airports" how Peel have managed to create this mess is nothing short of a disgrace.

keithpowles1 says...
7:15pm Sat 6 Aug 11

moxie34th wrote:
It's a simpleas this - look in any local Travel agent window - hardly any holidays advertised from OUR own airport ... there are supposed to be more people in Teesside area than up in Northumberland ( newcastle) ... so WHERE are the flights ? ! Who wants to ahve to travel 45 miles North foe an airport ? Or travel all the way over to Manchester , or down to London ? With HOURS of pre-booking in times imposed ( security -wise) ? I think it's a regional 'plan' to make Newcastle the ONLY regional airport , has been from 1964 . I don't care who's behind it , but I reckon that's always been the criterea . The name of the airport itself is a bit of a no-go one, a stupid one at that , but us customers have no say in it, as usual . Give us the flights Mr Director , and we'll certainly use it. We can't use what's not on offer !
Well said!!! The headline 'Use it or Lose it' is contradictive and if there are no or little flights, how can we use it? Richards is trying to blame the public by not using it and not himself!!!

lglglg says...
7:35pm Sat 6 Aug 11

1. Big mistake made when local authorities made partnership with Peel in preference to Manchester Airport Authotity bid - look what MMA has done with East Midlands and even Bournemouth!
2. Did MME lose LHR slots so bmi's parent, Lufthansa, could take them up for European flights? This has been suggested - same for LBA & DUB, I heard.
3. Peel, from my own experience, almost non responsive - I wrote 3 times, always constructively- without even the courtesy of an acknowledgement.
4.I want to fly from MME - I use MME-AMS for trips to Italy & France and when packages were available, Alicante & Faro, for example, my flights were full. Dublin always full when I used it.
5. My travel agent friend says customers are always asking for MME - but what's available?
6. I really believe the demand is there - it's just a matter of the right destinations - and at a fair price. Over to you, Vancouver Airports!!!!

Chloe 123 says...
2:12pm Mon 8 Aug 11

I agree with the comments above. The airport needs more airlines! I used to fly to Dublin and Heathrow often from MME and this service has now gone. Both routes were extreemly popular and I found flying to Heathrow and connecting to a long haul destination was ideal. The airport needs to bring back low cost airlines and holiday destination flights to popular places in europe...and I'm not talking Bulgaria here! The airport is small but thats its beauty as I would much rather fly in and out of there than drive 2 hours to newcastle or manchester. Getting the train to Heathrow with luggage...forget it! Maybe this is what Vancouver Airports are missing...people in the UK don't like to drive for hours before getting a flight...they don't need to as we have LOCAL airports with a high concentration of LOCAL people! Demand is there from the local and surrounding community...MME just needs to bring back the airlines to the popular destinations.

stiv says...
6:09pm Mon 8 Aug 11

Jenny, have a chat with the new Thai corus owner, maybe he can presuade their national airlines to lay on cheap flights from Teeside.

tomtopper says...
7:28pm Tue 9 Aug 11

Why not call it CHAVSIDE/SMOGGY VALLEY Airport? Fit the terminal out with a couple of fake burberry shops and gold sovereign dealers, cheap booze outlet and a tattooist (specializing in neck tattoos!) and a dole office... have all the signs in txt speak and a strict 'no drug searches' and 'only jammies and ugg boots allowed for females' policy. Pipe out hardcore rave music throughout the terminal and put on flights to blackpool... Couldn't lose!

haircuthargreaves says...
9:04pm Thu 11 Aug 11

Appears to be a lot of assumptions on here about what the airport has or has not done. Let's not forget that in recent years it has had flights to most of the destinations listed above - airlines and tour operators make the decision where they want to fly - not airports and where is the evidence that any airline has pulled out as a result of the airport has done? Dare I suggest that there simply is not sufficient demand in the area for these routes to be profitable for the airlines and tour operators? Changing the airport name will not make one jot of difference to any decision by an airline to operate a route and lets not forget that the airport changed its name to DTV at the request of one of its customers (bmibaby) who wished to operate low cost service to Belfast, Palma, Malaga etc...which are some of the routes that we are now saying you want?

click2find

Most popular


About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree