News RSS Feed Send your news, pictures & videos


Budget cuts will hit police numbers

JOB losses are “inevitable” after police forces across the region were told to slash £7.2m from their budgets within months, the public was warned last night.

Durham Police Authority said it had no alternative but to cut its workforce after making millions of pounds of savings in recent years, warning: “There is not an awful lot left to cut.”

The authority has called an emergency meeting for June 7, promising that its frontline service will be protected by targeting backroom staff, rather than beat officers.

Neighbouring Cleveland could not rule out redundancies for frontline officers and said: “There comes a time when there is no more meat on the bone and we are rapidly reaching that point.”

The police authorities spoke out after every force in the country suddenly had its budget for the 2010-11 financial year reduced, as part of the new coalition government’s spending squeeze.

On Monday, the Home Office was ordered to find £367m of immediate savings as part of £6.2bn of overall cuts, deciding to take £125m out of core police grants.

In the North-East and North Yorkshire, the reductions were Cleveland (£1.3m), Durham (£1.3m), North Yorkshire (£1.1m) and Northumbria (£3.5m).

Each force also had its capital grant reduced by between £100,000 and £300,000, as part of £10m of savings.

Counter-terrorism funding will be slashed by £10m, although the Home Office said it was still maintaining 2009- 10 funding levels at £569m.

Peter Thompson, Durham authority’s independent chairman, said: “I’m very concerned, because after three years of efficiencies, there is not an awful lot left to cut.

“When you consider that 85 per cent of our funding goes on salaries, you don’t have to be too clever to work out that there will be an impact on jobs. There will inevitably have to be cuts in staff numbers.

“I don’t want to use the r-word – redundancy – but when I go around our headquarters I see the concern in the eyes of our officers.”

Dave McLuckie, Cleveland’s chairman, said the fresh 2.5 per cent cut came on top of four per cent efficiencies it had already been forced to find this year to try to avoid job losses.

And he added: “It’s a shock to the system. This latest cut could mean that we will have to reduce officer numbers for the first time, however hard we try not to affect the service to the public.”

However, North Yorkshire authority was far more relaxed about the £1.1m cut imposed, insisting it could bring forward spending reductions pencilled in for next year without any job losses.

Ironically, the cuts were announced on the same day the coalition Government confirmed it was axing Labour’s identity cards scheme, to save £800m over a decade.

The Lib Dem election manifesto had pledged to “pay for 3,000 more police on the beat, affordable because we are cutting other spending, such as scrapping pointless ID cards”.

Policing Minister Nick Herbert said the Home Office would be cutting a “greater than proportionate share of its central budget”, targeting waste, consultancy services, marketing costs and travel.

But he added: “I will ask every police authority to make a fair share of savings.

“I am clear that savings can be achieved by driving out wasteful spending on support functions, reducing bureaucracy and increasing efficiency in key functions – leaving the frontline strong and secure.”

The cuts were also attacked by David Hanson, Labour’s policing spokesman, who warned: “It will have a real impact on policing, crime and the fight against terrorism.”

The coalition has come under fire because the Conservatives, prior to the election, claimed to have identified £6bn of “waste” that could be taken out of department budgets.

However, the cuts unveiled went much deeper, taking out key projects including Future Jobs Fund for young people and the Child Trust Fund.

Comments(8)

stevegg says...
11:37am Fri 28 May 10

Durham police have already been on an 18 month budget reduction policy which IS, despite the spin, affecting front line staff levels, mainly the response officers who perform 'blue light emergencys'. As I have said before these officers are being told by senior police officers (those who sit behind a desk on 9-5 weekday job) to work harder and longer and accept things are going to get worse. Moral is rockbottom with unpaid overtime and days off cancelled due to staff shortages. No police officer recruitment since April 2009 and none planned for at least the next 12 months, where is this going to end. By my estimation there will be 200 fewer police officers in Durham May 2011 as opposed to May 2009 (as about 80-90 leave each year). The law abiding public should be gravely concerned about this as it is you who will suffer. I pity those police officers left on front line duties who have one hand tied behind their backs through beurocracy and are made to chase impossible targets set by penpushers who havent a clue what is going on in the real world.

Jolly Roger says...
11:44am Fri 28 May 10

Well I say get rid of the pen pushers and let the police do they own job without hinderance.

entitled opinion says...
4:43pm Fri 28 May 10

I agree completely with Stevegg's comments above. There are shortages of police officers on the frontline already through cuts that have already been made. The further reduction of officers would be a major mistake that would not only put those remaining officers at a safety risk but would also put the public at an increased risk and would mean that the service that is provided to the public would suffer. It is quite true that officers are informed that they need to 'just get on with it and work harder' to continue to provide a saticfactory service to the public when the numbers are reduced but the reality is that they can only be stretched so far. When is it going to end? I know where it will end and it will be with either a police officer being seriously injured or even killed due to being in a situation where there is no other help available or the same for a member of public who needs help and there is literally one officer to attend to deal with it. If they continue to treat officers and police staff in this way I can assure you that they will get exactly what they want and people will just start to leave of their own accord and will take the valuable experience with them.

Super steve says...
6:00pm Fri 28 May 10

How will we be able to tell if they have cut numbers and reduced service, we never see them anyway unless they are out in force helping VOSA look for red diesel and untaxed vehicles.

Around here we have had 8 cars broken into, loads of anti social behaviour and gangs of drunk teens making pensioners lives a misery, we have cars regularly speeding through the village at 70 MPH. And the police responce !!!!! A piece of paper through our letter box telling us criminals are operating in the area......

No shortage of cops to protect politicians though.

BMD says...
6:27pm Fri 28 May 10

Today, I have read that it have been advised by Drug Addiction Experts to spend £15,000 per head suppling Heroin Addicts with a twice a day fix, at the cost of the NHS / Tax-payers.
.
A 38 year old woman who swindled Darlington Borough Council and the Department for Work and Pensions of £30,625.38 over three years, whom has been allowed to pay the amount back at a rate of £5 per week. It will take her 127 years to clear this debt.
.
But the people we want keeping the majority of Law abiding citizens safe are being reduced.
Where is the Justice?
.

st-george1 says...
9:43am Sat 29 May 10

Trouble on the Tees ... financial mis-management !
I'm sure the Labour Chair of the Cleveland Police Authority will continue to defend the indefensible and twitter on about their massive drop in 'recorded' crime and how he can justify giving the Chief Constable a £200,000 salary, plus £50,000 a year retention package, plus £24,000 'honorarium' payment, plus £32,000 car allowance, £4,000 a year private school fees and £1,000 a year private health insurance and then agreeing to keep him on even though he should have retired in 2009. No doubt he will also be getting a massive pension payoff for competing just 30 years service whilst the rest of us have to complete 45 years at least for a much smaller pension pot.
Budget cuts ! the answer is easier than he thinks. Everyone else has to manage on less, so what I wonder makes the Cleveland Police Authority feel they can't or won't and will no doubt make a lot of effort to defy the NEW government of the day.

mikethepom says...
10:22am Sat 29 May 10

Durham Police has been reknowned for its efficiency over the years.
But when 85% of your budget is on staff, and a fair proportion of the remainder committed to a Home Office-led contract for communications, it doesn't take a genius to work out that jobs will go.
Comments about police pensions are misguided and unhelpful - the costs don't come from force budgets any more.

Big Dave says...
12:56pm Sat 29 May 10

...typical idiotic response Steve- I'd expect nothing less. Perhaps you'd like to walk in their shoes before commenting. The officers I know do their best in very trying circumstances, despite almost constant criticism from people like yourself who have no idea of the realities of what they deal with (and the absurdutues of the way in which they're forced to operate). Anyway,if you want to help solve the problem, Durham are still taking on specials; you seem pretty special to me

click2find

Most popular


About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree