News RSS Feed Send your news, pictures & videos


The new unitary, Durham County Council, to 'rationalise' offices


COUNCIL offices could close under a major buildings review at the region’s newest local authority.

Durham County Council’s executive cabinet is being asked to “rationalise” its offices portfolio, to allow public access to services while providing value for money.

The council also hopes to cut its carbon footprint and make better use of modern technology.

Durham’s County Hall would be likely to remain the council headquarters with “main centres”, with up to 500 staff, in former district council offices in Chester-le-Street, Durham, Crook and Spennymoor and a yet to be decided location in east Durham.

“Supporting centres” with up to 100 staff could be set up in: Consett, Stanley, Easington, Barnard Castle, Bishop Auckland, Newton Aycliffe, Seaham or Stanhope.

These would improve the services available in remote areas, a report for next week’s cabinet meeting says.

But it adds: “Much of our office stock needs significant investment to make it efficient office accommodation, but this required spend may not prove the most cost effective solution when weighing up the longer term repairs and maintenance liabilities.

“The project will explore the potential for disposal of surplus sites and alternative office accommodation proposals.”

The former Easington District Council offices do not provide value for money or a suitable environment, the report says, and there are plans to demolish Consett Civic Centre.

The new unitary Durham County Council, which was created on April 1, inherited a large number of offices from its predecessors.

Councillors and residents have complained of an exodus of staff to County Hall.

Ian Thompson, the council’s director of regeneration and economic development, said: “The new council has inherited a mix of accommodation, some of which is better equipped than others to serve modern purposes.

“We hope this report will set a clear pathway for a thorough look at what will best match public expectations and staff needs.

“We want to make best use of the huge range of property the new unitary now has to support regeneration in many key areas.”

A full council meeting yesterday approved a motion by Conservative Councillor Richard Bell that council offices be reviewed and an action plan drawn up. The reorganisation programme could take up to two years.

Comments(3)

dolanp1 says...
10:40am Thu 14 Jan 10

Going by past performances this will turn out to be another expensive cost cutting exercise, remember the Durham 'park and ride' it cost £25,000 more after they had a cost cutting exercise about it.

George BA says...
5:56pm Thu 14 Jan 10

We dont have boroughs/districts any more we dont have a county council, why not close all the satelite sites and save th emoney, why do we need 7 planning offices, or 7 environmental health offices, or 7 of anythign else.
We have a new authority that is thinking in the old ways, the NEW auhtority was about saving on waster and offering better serivce.
How many have lost there highly paid jobs to stop the duplication, the answer is simple NONE. unless they have gone on veyr highly lucrative voluntary redundancy or early retirement.

Nicholas_Till says...
6:53pm Sun 17 Jan 10

Keeping the different planning offices seems a good thing to me - the people working in / from these ought to know their particular area in some detail. If there's just one central planning office, there's more chance that people there will make decisions about places they don't know sufficient about and don't know at first hand.

That is what strikes me as a weakness of the all-County or County Cabinet decision-making process, in the matter of planning.


Most popular


Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »

Local Businesses