News RSS Feed


Croft motor racing circuit loses noise appeal


A RACING circuit today lost its appeal against a legal case brought by a couple and their daughter who say their lives have been blighted by noise from the track.

Croft Circuit, near Darlington, was also hit with an injunction, restricting "noisy activities" at the track to just 40 days-a-year.

Derek and Julia Watson and their daughter, Jill Wilson, all live within about 300 metres of the circuit, in Dalton-on-Tees, and say their enjoyment of their homes has for years been gravely affected by the "loud, intrusive and repetitive noise".

In an extremely rare decision in April last year, High Court judge, Mr Justice Simon, ruled all three had been victims of "noise nuisance" and ordered the circuit's tenants - Croft Promo-Sport Ltd - to pay Mr and Mrs Watson £109,600 damages, and Mrs Wilson £40,000.

Croft Promo-Sport had its appeal against that order dismissed by judges today.

However the issuing of the injunction will result in a reduction in the residents' damages payouts, which were largely based on the reduction in value of their homes caused by the noise nuisance.

Croft Promo Sport also faces massive legal costs bills. The Watsons and Mrs Wilson were represented by top QC, David Hart, and their legal costs bills alone have been put at around £700,000.

At London's Appeal Court, Croft Promo-Sport had argued that Mr Justice Simon was "plainly wrong" to rule in favour of the Watsons.

Richard Jones QC, for the company, argued that 1963 and 1988 planning permissions granted for the race track - formerly a World War 2 aerodrome and first used for racing in 1949 - had "changed the character" of the area to such an extent that the noise levels were reasonable.

He added that noise and other issues relating to the racetrack had been carefully considered by expert planning inspectors during two public inquiries and a balance struck between the interests of local residents and the public amenity value of the circuit.

The QC said the court decision would have serious implications for the future use of the racetrack and had left Croft Promo-Sport not only exposed to enormous legal costs bills, but also open to other potential claims by an "uncertain number" of other neighbouring landowners.

However, Appeal Court judge, Sir Andrew Morritt, today said he could find no legal flaw in Mr Justice Simon's conclusion that the Watsons and Mrs Wilson had suffered an "actionable nuisance".

Sir Andrew, sitting with Lord Justice Richards and Lady Justice Hallett, also ruled it was "illogical" of Mr Justice Simon to deny the trio an injunction, restricting the number of days to 40 on which "noisy activities" can take place at the racetrack.

Croft Promo-Sport were refused permission to appeal further to the House of Lords and ordered to pay more than £120,000 in legal costs straight away. That will be only a fraction of the total lawyers' bills faced by the company.

The objection by the Watsons and Mrs Wilson was not to car and motorbike racing events, which take place on the track on about 45-50 days-a-year, but to "vehicle testing days" and "track days", when members of the public drive cars around the track all day long at high speed.

Croft Promo-Sport Ltd has a leasehold interest in the circuit, which is managed by Croft Classic and Historic Motor Sports Ltd (CCHM). CCHM was set up in 1994 by Mr Jimmy Wilson - who was married to Jill Wilson between 1987 and 1994 - along with Trevor Chaytor-Norris and his wife Katherine, who is the owner of the Croft Motor Circuit.



Your Say YourNorth-East

loan_star, Darlington says...
12:33pm Mon 26 Jan 09

Pathetic decision!! These people need to get a life, what did they expect living next to a race track? Funny to see the daughter is the ex wife of a previous owner!! Maybe some bad feeling going on there as well? Something not right about this at all.

hairy dan, croft says...
12:36pm Mon 26 Jan 09

Absolutely disgusting that these money grabbers can affect the local economy like this, they weren't complaining about the noise when they tried to get planning permission to turn their property into a hotel which would have benefited from the circuit. I hope they can sleep at night knowing that their actions will cost local people jobs and money.

philc, darlington says...
12:38pm Mon 26 Jan 09

whats this country coming to? One day we'll get done for shouting in our own house, and the families want to get a life what did they think was gonna happen at the circuit teddy bears picnics

Marktrack, Luton says...
1:25pm Mon 26 Jan 09

Having visited Croft many times, They are definitely one of the most considerate circuits in the country regarding noise. The rest better watch out. I hope The Wilsons are happy knowing how many peoples livelyhoods will be destroyed by this ludicrous outcome. No wonder people are leaving this country in droves if we have idiots upholding decisions like this!

Andyleigh, Tudhoe says...
1:27pm Mon 26 Jan 09

Three bitter people have succeeded in ruining the pleasure of many and endangering the livelihood of others. How selfish.

johnmc, croft on tees says...
1:41pm Mon 26 Jan 09

So lets get this straight. The government sponsored THINK campaign spends its whole time promoting and encouraging the general public to use race tracks to help road safety, But it would seem as long as its not in North Yorkshire!!

Dan81, Hurworth Place says...
2:04pm Mon 26 Jan 09

Ridiculous decision considering how much local businesses depend on the revenue generated by the race circuit. You only have to visit a local pub or hotel during race events to see how much they benefit from this. It's not as if we are blessed with a large amount of sporting venues in the are, and the money grabbing actions of 3 people could diminish the number even further. As someone who lives close to the circuit I can vouch for the strict controls on noise levels, and it seems double standards that now the people in question can no longer gain revenue from the circuit they have now decided it is too loud! Cynical!

grove, D'Ton says...
2:22pm Mon 26 Jan 09

next they will be closing the airport, because some Doris, dosnt like the sound of the little airoplanes

dougmum, Leeds says...
2:23pm Mon 26 Jan 09

This decision is stupid. This opens the flood gates for every circuit in Britain. My family would love to live near to a race track. Croft are one of the best at keeping noise to a minimum . These people should be ashamed of themselves the track was there first. There should be more racing at Croft not less.

big arnie, Darlo says...
2:43pm Mon 26 Jan 09

Bet they were absolutely gobsmacked when they discovered the motor racing circuit next door had, erm, motor vehicles racing round it. Money-grabbers.

Still, I'm having a word with the council about the tree outside my house. There's a sparrow keeps **** in it and I can't sleep. Kerching.


PettyComplainer, Darlington says...
2:52pm Mon 26 Jan 09

My mate had to go change his exhaust because Croft scrutineers said it was too loud. This is the only time he EVER had to change it in years of racing.
Sorry, I was typing a bit loud then..!

Ninja Rider, Stockton says...
3:00pm Mon 26 Jan 09

Surely someone must have looked at this at thought wait there, this is a joke? This beats the no win no fee adverts you see everywhere, all you have to do is buy a house in Croft, wait a bit and then complain about the noise. The country seems to be going mad bit by bit. These people should be ashamed that they are destroying motorsports loved by many and also taking away the chance for people such as myself to get great motorsport photos and develop on a hobby without having to travel the length of the country.

the simple, Darlington says...
3:00pm Mon 26 Jan 09

If all these people want this event to happen why don't they offer to buy the house from these people. How many hotels and pubs are used by people attending these events?

harry2, darlington says...
3:04pm Mon 26 Jan 09

cant help wondering why they all chose to live near the circuit, im guessing they live seperate so the second person moving in must have known the noise.

and if a problem move houses there are other houses

BTCC fan, Near Brands Hatch says...
3:23pm Mon 26 Jan 09

How ridiculous! I don't understand why they are only complaining about track days - you'd think that the noise from other events when 10s of 1000s of people attend would be far greater than any track day. I do hope that this is not the beginning of the end for Croft as I imagine there will be plenty of people jumping on the compensation band wagon now. :(

Barr1e, shildon says...
3:29pm Mon 26 Jan 09

do these people not consider that it is events such as track days that keep all the wanabe street racers off the roads and let them get their kicks on track. they moved near to the track so wheres the problem. i think i might move right next to the M1 motorway and complain about the trafic.
having used croft myself the noise limits are nothing in comparison to race days and the numbers of people taking part are limited also.
it all seems to that these moaning people should be ashamed of themseves as it looks like they are out to make a few quid. pure shamefull and i hope i never bump into these people.

dippyone, sedgefield says...
3:30pm Mon 26 Jan 09

It's obvious to me that Mr Watson bears a personal grudge against Croft Circuit. Could it be that he once worked there? Think about it. Why else would he persue the case so adamently?

stevebrown, bishop auckland says...
3:32pm Mon 26 Jan 09

they are pathetic, money grabbing, attention seeking idiot's, do they realise how many pepole are going to affected by there action's, let's hope that there next move is worse and they can't do anything about it. wonder if i can claim any money as i live a mile away from the local tip due to the smell, once again they are PATHETIC, get a life.

ianh, hurworth says...
3:57pm Mon 26 Jan 09

A ludicrous judgement that will impact on all sorts "nuisance" led complaints.
Given the info re the family connections to the circuit this appears to have been driven out of spite with no appreciation for the effect it will have on local buisness nor indeed the sporting prestiege of the area.
As a resident of Hurworth (1 mile from croft) it is very apparent how much business is done locally, both for meetings and trackdays, when pubs and hotels are extremely busy as a result.
I wonder if the judge will take a similar stance when our village has the largest golf course in europe with all of the traffic and congestion that will bring with it?

ianh, hurworth says...
4:02pm Mon 26 Jan 09

one more thing.......

if the track has to fold as a result of this action can i suggest it is returned to its original purpose?
ie for RAF bombers to fly from!
then perhaps these idiots may really have something to complain about!

petershaw, darlington says...
4:06pm Mon 26 Jan 09

the worlds gone crazy, all the years croft has been there and someone can come along and get away this, its a sad sad day, i really hope croft circuit doesnt close, these people should be ashamed of themselves, but thats the world we live in now a world of litigation where all people like this see is making a few quid (well more than a few quid)i live near durham tees valley airport so here goes (nothing gained nothing ventured) **** those noisy planes cant here the telly

philc, darlington says...
4:30pm Mon 26 Jan 09

I think they are going to get more noise of the people driving past their house blowing their horns in anger, I for one am very upset at their actions MONEY GRABBERS!!!

TOM BRAVINGTON, CONSETT says...
4:33pm Mon 26 Jan 09

This is unbeleivable !, how wrong is this ? just to satisfy these selfish and bitter people , this is not about noise , this is about selfishness and greed . I cant beleive that a court has not understood this and prefered to listen to these bitter people rather than a majority of the community and the northeast as a whole.Croft has given so much to the area and is like a second home to be and my family , so professionally run and some thing to be proud of if your from the area. once again the northeast loses out on a great facility (as i cant imagine that they can survive on 40 days) and now we once again will have to travel down south to view what the southern half of the country can enjoy at ease .

ianh, hurworth says...
4:56pm Mon 26 Jan 09

apologies, but one more point.
why have the local council not made their support for this major local facility clear? (hambleton/n.yorks c.c.)
I am no lover of darlington borough council but when the local football club have been (repeatedly) in troubly dbc have consistantly helped it as it is seen as a vital local facility. So were is the support for croft from their authority when its needed?

350zgt, Darlington says...
5:04pm Mon 26 Jan 09

Absolutely disgusting! I don’t know who I’m more annoyed with the Watson’s for their ludicrous behaviour or the courts for even giving them the time of day. I thought courts were elected to make rulings for the good of the general public. How many people have come out to speak in favour of the Watsons? Nobody – oh sorry yes their lawyer but if I stood to make £700,000 in legal fees I would tell you the sea is green and the grass is blue!

At a time when the north east is losing so many jobs the actions of a selfish minority could have lost hundreds more directly and indirectly in terms of loss of revenue from race meetings.

This sets a dangerous precedent for all motor racing venues across the country a lot of which are far less courteous neighbours than Croft. I don’t know another circuit with stricter controls on both noise and hours of operation. So watch this space Brands Hatch, Silverstone, Donington etc this could be you next. I assume the Watson’s will also be making a similar claim against the East Coast Mainline which runs within very close proximity and Teesside Airport while they are on. Pretty soon they will have a nice house a baron wasteland as they will have shut everything else down around about them.

Well I hope they are happy that they have potentially ruined one of the North Easts few national standard sporting venues that is enjoyed by thousands of people bringing millions of pounds into the local economy.

The only winners from this are the fat cat lawyers who are laughing all the way to the bank.

I really hope there is some way Croft can survive this injustice and am confident they have the backing of the majority of the people in the northeast and the all of the motorsport community. I just wish this had been brought to public attention via the local media at an earlier stage and perhaps weight of public opinion may have seen common sense prevail.

Sad sad day to be British.

Sensible Sam, Hunton says...
5:05pm Mon 26 Jan 09

Call me cynical bit isn't it a little odd that the EX-wife of one of the management team is behind this legal action. Bet there were no complaints about noise when it meant Mrs Wilson was getting the benefit of it. What will happen now? Croft will lose a lot of money in the hotels etc if the circuit folds...and it just might happen. Absolutely Ridiculous

the simple, Darlington says...
5:32pm Mon 26 Jan 09

All these coments from biased people. How many of them wants to live next to croft , I am certain theres plenty of houses for sale near the circuit. Another case of Not in My back Yard Everyone's stupid except them. Notice how they never answer a question they only slag objectors off.

the simple, Darlington says...
5:35pm Mon 26 Jan 09

Most of the competitors stay in tents and caravans and bring their owm booze and food . Which hotel benifits?

the simple, Darlington says...
5:40pm Mon 26 Jan 09

What has Mike Burton ( Coun. & Perspective LD. Parlmentary Candidate and local health shop owner) got to say?

Derwent, Derwent says...
5:48pm Mon 26 Jan 09

The Watsons would appear to have moved to near the circuit when their son in law started managing the track. They did not seem to mind any noise then! it seems like a long running spite campaign!
As for accomodation, the last time I competed at Croft I ened up in a hotel near Richmond as every where was booked up nearer the track and that was for a club meeting!

BarryS, Belfast says...
5:50pm Mon 26 Jan 09

That is totally ludicrous and ranks even lower than BBC decision not to carry the Gaza appeal

350zgt, Darlington says...
5:51pm Mon 26 Jan 09

the simple wrote:
Most of the competitors stay in tents and caravans and bring their owm booze and food . Which hotel benifits?
Croft Spa Hotel?

the simple, Darlington says...
6:05pm Mon 26 Jan 09

BarryS Belfast
What has the BBC and Gazza got to do with a legal case in the north east?
I rest my case


GeoffH, Hartlepool says...
6:07pm Mon 26 Jan 09

the simple wrote:
Most of the competitors stay in tents and caravans and bring their owm booze and food . Which hotel benifits?
The hotel that the family who brought this case wanted to build there a few years ago would certainly have benefitted. The noise did not seem to be an issue back then, did it ?




the simple, Darlington says...
6:08pm Mon 26 Jan 09

Next we will be told the hotels in darlington benifit on race days

the simple, Darlington says...
6:11pm Mon 26 Jan 09

The hotel that the family who brought this case wanted to build there a few years ago would certainly have benefitted. The noise did not seem to be an issue back then, did it ?
Did they get planning permission?

BTCC fan, Near Brands Hatch says...
6:13pm Mon 26 Jan 09

the simple wrote:
All these coments from biased people. How many of them wants to live next to croft , I am certain theres plenty of houses for sale near the circuit. Another case of Not in My back Yard Everyone's stupid except them. Notice how they never answer a question they only slag objectors off.
I live near Brands Hatch and haven't felt the need to complain about any events held there. I also live near a bus stop, church and a branch of Battersea Dogs Home - haven't complained about them either. I chose to live where I did and therefore live with the noise.

As for "All these coments from biased people" it's hardly our fault that those in favour haven't come on here to express their opinions is it!?!

350zgt, Darlington says...
6:18pm Mon 26 Jan 09

BTCC fan wrote:
the simple wrote: All these coments from biased people. How many of them wants to live next to croft , I am certain theres plenty of houses for sale near the circuit. Another case of Not in My back Yard Everyone's stupid except them. Notice how they never answer a question they only slag objectors off.
I live near Brands Hatch and haven't felt the need to complain about any events held there. I also live near a bus stop, church and a branch of Battersea Dogs Home - haven't complained about them either. I chose to live where I did and therefore live with the noise. As for "All these coments from biased people" it's hardly our fault that those in favour haven't come on here to express their opinions is it!?!
Well said that man. I live in a non-descript semi detached house in off the shelf housing estate in Darlington. I would quite happily swap the Watsons for their house that is so awfull. You pays your money you makes your choice

GeoffH, Hartlepool says...
6:18pm Mon 26 Jan 09

the simple wrote:
The hotel that the family who brought this case wanted to build there a few years ago would certainly have benefitted. The noise did not seem to be an issue back then, did it ?
Did they get planning permission?
Whether planning permission was granted or not is irrelevant.

They sought to gain from increased activity at the Circuit, but when the former Circuit Manager and his wife went their separate ways, the ex-wife and her parents later launched this case based on the very same activities they sought to profit from.


the simple, Darlington says...
6:20pm Mon 26 Jan 09

Brands hatch , I heard that name before

Kat99, Darlington says...
6:20pm Mon 26 Jan 09

I'm at a loss to understand the Judge's decision. If these people moved in and the track was already there, then surely they shouldn't have grounds to complain?
Hopefully, their legal bills will massively outweigh any money they get. I sincerely hope that this doesn't signal the start of the end for racing at Croft. It's a great and very popular amenity.

the simple, Darlington says...
6:23pm Mon 26 Jan 09

They sought to gain from increased activity at the Circuit, but when the former Circuit Manager and his wife went their separate ways, the ex-wife and her parents later launched this case based on the very same activities they sought to profit from.
They must have been in the House of Lords once

GeoffH, Hartlepool says...
6:30pm Mon 26 Jan 09

Kat99 wrote:
I'm at a loss to understand the Judge's decision. If these people moved in and the track was already there, then surely they shouldn't have grounds to complain?
Hopefully, their legal bills will massively outweigh any money they get. I sincerely hope that this doesn't signal the start of the end for racing at Croft. It's a great and very popular amenity.
Legal costs won't be their problem as the losing party usually has to pay, thus exposing the Circuit to huge costs. The figure of £700,000 has been mentioned.

It may also open the floodgates to other claims against the Circuit.


TOM BRAVINGTON, CONSETT says...
6:37pm Mon 26 Jan 09

the simple wrote:
If all these people want this event to happen why don't they offer to buy the house from these people. How many hotels and pubs are used by people attending these events?
YES I WOULD LOVE TO LIVE NEAR CROFT , IT WOULD BE IDEAL FOR ME , BUT I,M AFRAID ITS NOT THAT SIMPLE. HOW COME ITS OUR RESPONSIBILITY TO MAKE THESE SELFISH PEOPLE REALISE THAT IF YOU DONT LIKE THE SOUND OF MOTOR BIKES AND CARS RACING AROUND A RACE TRACK ......DONT MOVE NEXT TO ONE !!!!!!!!! WHY THE HELL SHOULD PEOPLE WHO SUPPORT THE RACE CIRCUIT HAVE TO GIVE THESE PEOPLE MONEY, THEY SHOULDN'T HAVE CHOSE TO LIVE THERE , THE TRACK WAS THERE FIRST!!! , OR IS THAT WHAT ITS ALL ABOUT ?!!!MONEY!!!!

GeoffH, Hartlepool says...
6:45pm Mon 26 Jan 09

I would suggest anyone thinking of posting in support of this decision does a bit of research into the background behind this case.

It is NOT a straightforward noise complaint. The noise issue is simply a convenient stick to beat the circuit with.

"Hell hath no fury"....i'm sure you know the rest of that saying.

1510, Croft says...
6:50pm Mon 26 Jan 09

This is just beyond a joke! We are one of the hotels in croft who have such lovely and appreciative people who stay with us when coming to the circuit, either to drive or to spectate. In this economic climate we need people who want to visit our area to enable us as employers to keep our loyal and dedicated employees in well paid jobs. Maybe they should have thought about other people's loses rather than their own gains before they persistantly persued their actions against Croft Circuit, not to mention the repercussions for other race circuits and their staff.

1510, Croft says...
6:59pm Mon 26 Jan 09

the simple wrote:
Most of the competitors stay in tents and caravans and bring their owm booze and food . Which hotel benifits?
all around the area hotels, B+Bs and pubs benifit from the Circuit. Including US here at Clow Beck House!!

the simple, Darlington says...
7:16pm Mon 26 Jan 09

' Well paid jobs at the Croft Spa Hotel ' ' loyal and dedicated staff'


Jammybstard, Barton says...
7:17pm Mon 26 Jan 09

Plain Stupid
If you want to turn the area into a giant retirement home; this the way to go about it!

GeoffH, Hartlepool says...
7:22pm Mon 26 Jan 09

Jammybstard wrote:
Plain Stupid
If you want to turn the area into a giant retirement home; this the way to go about it!
Well you know the sort of people who like to occupy large areas of unused land in this country...At least we'll know where to go to have our driveways re-surfaced.


1510, Croft says...
7:23pm Mon 26 Jan 09

the simple wrote:
' Well paid jobs at the Croft Spa Hotel ' ' loyal and dedicated staff'
There is another hotel in croft, an award winning one, who do have loyal and dedicated staff. This would be us.

lightening-joe, Silsden says...
7:30pm Mon 26 Jan 09

This is morally wrong and simply absurd!
Now anyone living next to any venue that could possibly be deemed as 'noisy' will have the right to claim compensation. These greedy, money grabbing killjoys have in effect paved the way for every freeloader to 'have a go' just as the first liar to jump out of his car, rubbing his neck after being rear ended at 2 MPH, did.
These people are stealing our money but worse than that, they are stealing our freedom.
Someone said, and I quote: The Motor racing fans should rip the wig from that judges head and stick it up his **** It might just shock him to his senses.
The whole law society needs replacing with one that is founded on Common Sense.

Cheffy!!, langley park says...
7:46pm Mon 26 Jan 09

PettyComplainer wrote:
My mate had to go change his exhaust because Croft scrutineers said it was too loud. This is the only time he EVER had to change it in years of racing. Sorry, I was typing a bit loud then..!
Exactly, Croft has been one of the most strict tracks i've been too, if not the strictest, always saying if your pipes too loud you not getting on track.....
The judge must have been asked to leave the track with his exhaust being too loud.....
as for you 'Simple' your user name say's it all!!!
either that or the Watsons or Wilsons are your relations.....

John race fan, dalton says...
7:56pm Mon 26 Jan 09

I live in Dalton, enjoy track days, watching motor sport. I have neighbors "pro" and "anti" croft circuit and will selfishly miss having a choice of track days. My gripe however is not about the case but how it has been reported, I can only imagine the circuit and their lawyers have cringed at many of the comments on this and other forums making genuine race fans look like mindless idiots making threats with bad language with little or no knowledge of the facts. If this is the modern day lynch mob's way of dealing with a dispute thank God for judges even if they get it wrong sometimes. But surely this debate should be about the circuit and not a forum to abuse people. The family concerned obviously don’t share our passion for motor sport but they are decent people and many of the comments on face book (the website the papers have promoted with the "save croft" thread) are rude, untrue and threatening and some are all three. Imagine they were written about your Daughter, Mother, Wife, Grandma, Dad Husband or Granddad because they are all of these to someone. Also bare in mind all those who wish to show your support by coming to croft to protest by doing "donuts" on our lawns or driving around the village "blowing your horns" and even "bulldozing" our homes remember many of us probably enjoy and support the circuit more than those have written this stuff. There are two sides to every argument on one side.. When they bought their house in the 1980's the circuit ran a handful of meetings per year and last year it had c.200 days. Is that any different to you buying a house next to a quiet road and 20 years later its becomes a Motorway.. Should you take it on the chin you knew it was a road when you bought it? And on the other side the argument for the circuit is well documented it is one of the friendliest well-organized circuits in the UK and they feel without the non-spectator events they will find it difficult to fund the 13 or so spectator events, which help the local Hotels and B&B, trade. So let’s keep it in perspective (to the best of my knowledge these are the figures) the circuit had c.200 noisy days last year they will be cut to 40 perhaps this is too few and perhaps 200 was too many? This is no doubt the debate, which has been going on, and will no doubt run and run. But please lets stop the swipes at our village and the family involved. It is too easy to jump on the popular bandwagon but before you do please consider how reckless support reflects on our Circuit and how it makes both the pro and anti croft locals feel.

Derwent, Derwent says...
8:13pm Mon 26 Jan 09

As someone who races at Croft, I appreciate yoru views.Hownver what really worries me is the fact that a family dispute seems to be behind the whole thing. it's taking "Hell has no fury etc" to a new level.
The family should just forget about it and actually move on physically and mentally. Had Jimmy Wislon still been part of the family I doubt if the action would have ever started.

alfaromeo1, northallerton says...
8:19pm Mon 26 Jan 09

What would have these people have done if this was still a WW2 base??.
possibly taken the nazi's to court!!
this areodrome had noise long before these people were born.
apart from motor sport there are many non noise activates which are carried out at croft to the benefit of many young and old alike.
THE WORLD AND THE COURTS HAVE ALL GONE MAD.

sensible, durham says...
8:22pm Mon 26 Jan 09

John Race Fan - it isnt as simple as you make out. This is a case of malicous and financially motivated bit of (very expensive) mischief making, by a family who were heavily involved with the circuit in the past.

mid life crisis, Bury says...
9:38pm Mon 26 Jan 09

My Family and I used to enjoy power boating on Lake Windermere but along with many other people don't spend the £££££ per year, or even visit the area since the speed ban was introduced.

Four years ago I took up motor sport and have competed at the excellent Croft circuit on a number of occasions. As a family we normally make a weekend of it, even though I only compete for one day.

We stay at the very welcoming Clow Beck House, use the local pubs, restaurants and visit the near by attractions.

Croft motor racing circuit has given us all some great weekends away. Sometimes expensive and frustrating due to the strict noise regulations which were always strictly policed.

I do hope that this needless action will not result in the decline of the local business as it has in the Lake District, and force our family to look elsewhere for are weekend escapes.

Andy Dunnet, Edinburgh says...
10:29pm Mon 26 Jan 09

This is a terrible decision which will have recriminations all over the country and not just at motorsport events.
The sad thing is that a spiteful vindictive woman with an axe to grind due to a marriage breakup has been allowed to do so much damage.
Croft is a great circuit and very responsible when it comes to noise issues. I would imagine that it's future is now in doubt as these extra days are what helps pay the wages.
How selfish to live next to a racetrack and take the money from a spouse then destroy peoples future when the marriage breaks up.
Mrs Wilson you are everything that is wrong with this country nowadays.. Pure greed.

Mach 1, Birtley says...
11:18pm Mon 26 Jan 09

I appreciate John (race fan)'s stance regarding the decision. Unfortunately a lot of people have only found out after the event that Croft is dire straights, and it is probably too late to petition against the Watson's actions.
A lot of the nasty remarks and threats are just some peoples way of trying to get over their frustration at something that they cannot fight. When it comes to motorsport, or hobbies regarding a lot of forms of motorised transport, it always seems that there is a unfair approach to deciding outcomes, and sometimes, no matter what you do to try to put a point over it will inevitably fall upon deaf ears.
I understand that everyone should have a semblance of peace in their home, but you have to remember that their is only a handfull of tracks in the country, one realistically in the North, whilst there are millions of homes that you can move to if you don't like your residence.
I doubt an appeal will change anything though

JoanneB1973, Preston, Lancashire says...
12:10am Tue 27 Jan 09

A number of comments have mentioned about the influx of complaints to various other circuits following this ruling. Not just circuits are under threat. Can you imagine a noise complaint from someone living within the sight of a football club for instance? And I bet their 20,000 or so supporters would not be very nice!!!

cupid stunt, crook says...
8:23am Tue 27 Jan 09

it will make a great site for travellers.

tamaz, Airdrie says...
8:29am Tue 27 Jan 09

This is a victory for ignorance and stupidity over common sense and justice. Mr Justice Simon, that has to be ironic. Justice, god! He has to be a brain dead monkey to have come up with that ruling. What an idiot! I wonder why the majority of us have absolutely no regard for the legal profession, everytime one of them does something this stupid they undermine the laws of this country.

69lou96, darlington says...
10:32am Tue 27 Jan 09

Ive lived in Hurworth all my life and I have NEVER heard anyone complain about the noise from the circuit. Yes it is noisy - we can hear it from our house 2 miles away - but what do you expect? We can hear the trains on the East Coast main-line and the planes from Durham Tees Valley Airport as well. We can hear sirens from emergency service vehicles all the way from Darlington if the wind is in the right direction but so what? Shall we ban anything that is louder than a child crying....but maybe that would disturb our peace on a Sunday afternoon! The world has gone insane and this has to be one of the most pathetic blame/claim payouts I have heard of! At some point we have to be responsible for our own actions...they moved there! No one forced them to live near the circuit. If Croft cicuit was to close because of this spiteful campaign by an aggrieved ex-wife, I wonder what would be there instead. I suggest a housing estate for all the hooligans and antisocial beings that have been evicted from their houses due to their unruly behaviour. A school for children - and their parents - with ASBOs and a nightclub with a 24 hour license. Im sure that would be preferable to noise on a track day!!!

fredrobson, stockton on tees says...
10:35am Tue 27 Jan 09

croft circuit can take it to another level that is the european court, i feel this would be more successful.

madisonmotorsport, Ashford says...
10:53am Tue 27 Jan 09

This case stinks to the rafters of back-handers! The nearest housing to the circuit is 1/4 mile away in the village! I have been to the circuit many times and I can vouch for the fact that any noise you hear in the residential area is negligible. What a load of utter bloomers! Another fine example of how crooked the law can be!

chris.burns@npat.co.uk, Bishop auckland/crook says...
11:25am Tue 27 Jan 09

Stupid Stupid Stupid decision i realy hope the people who brought this action are ashamed and feeling sick!!1 what do you expect to happen when you buy a house next to a race track??
what a great way to get your droping value in you house back sue some one!!! i bet if they had sale details drawn up they would say "Iseal views of the adjancent race track, and if you want a cash injection sue them for noise oh and by the way the nuresery next door can be noisey at times might be worth having a go at them!!

paris1, darlington says...
12:14pm Tue 27 Jan 09

SOME PEOPLE HAVE SAID THEY WOULD LIKE TO LIVE NEAR THE CIRCUIT. MY HOUSE HAS BEEN ON THE MARKET FOR 4 YEARS & CANT SELL IT BECAUSE OF THE CIRCUIT. . .SO WHY DONT YOU BUY IT!

Vem, Darlington says...
12:26pm Tue 27 Jan 09

paris1 wrote:
SOME PEOPLE HAVE SAID THEY WOULD LIKE TO LIVE NEAR THE CIRCUIT. MY HOUSE HAS BEEN ON THE MARKET FOR 4 YEARS & CANT SELL IT BECAUSE OF THE CIRCUIT. . .SO WHY DONT YOU BUY IT!
Did you buy your house when you knew the circuit was there?

Did you buy it for a reduced price because of the circuit?

If you have truly lost money because of the circuit and are having to drop the value of your home then I don't see why the circuit couldn't make up the difference. The new owners wouldn't have the same luxury as they would have bought the house for a reduced price anyway. The circuit would soon make their way through all the properties in the immediate area and there shouldn't be any problem from then on.

I suspect though that you bought your house when the circuit was there however, and that you payed under market value because of the circuit in the first place - I could be wrong though.

Vem, Darlington says...
1:17pm Tue 27 Jan 09

One more thing...

I've been to BTCC and the British Superbikes a few times and as I recall, the noise is minimal. It's not until you get up on to the banking that surrounds the Dalton-on-Tees side that the noise gets louder. I think that banking almost acts like a shield and blocks a lot of the noise out.

69lou96, darlington says...
2:48pm Tue 27 Jan 09

Theres a house near us thats been for sale for ages aswell.....nothing to do with the circuit just the housing market is terrible just now. Try dropping your price a bit if you are desperate to sell....unfortunatel
y everyone whos trying to sell just now is in the same boat!

John race fan, dalton says...
3:39pm Tue 27 Jan 09

we need to look for positives for the way forward, Thruxton Circuit has never been allowed track days so this is not new or unique to the north east. Look at F3 cars they have tiny little air intakes to restrict the performance and ridiculously loud exhausts .. obviously not for performance just to be loud.. its ridiculous decisions like these that make the problem worse. If Croft only has 40 days for very noisy days but are free to run as many days as they like for road silenced vehicles they will obviously be able to run their normal corporate days Merc BMW etc, and there own School Days.. and if an enterprising company develops bolt on silencers for sports performance road cars you could have as many track days as we like... the truth is with the recession none of the tracks are forecasting growth in track days this year and the problems at Croft Elvington etc are perhaps a result of the boom time where we where offered as many days as people wanted and until the last couple of years practically unrestricted on noise.. this is now payback for our excess's but rather than keel over and die or die fighting we should be looking at ways of securing the future of these facilities not trying to preserve dinosaurs. And before you say its all about the noise no it isn't.. people pay more to purr round a track at 4000 revs in a Lambo than rip round in a boy racer Peugeot 205 with an aftermarket exhaust annoying everyone.. circuit Driving is not about top speed or how much noise you can make it is about the racing line and car control. We should be getting behind the circuits with positive ideas for improvements and show our support. Otherwise we will all make a big fuss now and then leave them to carry on like when the local garage or corner shop is about to close there is an outcry we cant loss this service, but within 2 weeks everyone's off to fill up at Tesco's because every little helps!


Andy Dunnet, Edinburgh says...
4:38pm Tue 27 Jan 09

John, Thruxton did have trackdays until a similar bufoon complained and put paid to them.
I really hope the family are proud of what they have done.
I hope they don't use a petrol mower to cut their grass as the noise will be too much for them.

Cheffy!!, langley park says...
8:22pm Tue 27 Jan 09

"last couple of years practically unrestricted on noise.. this is now payback for our excess's"
John,
As i said earlier Croft has one of the most strictest and quietest track days Noise Level: 100db strictly enforced.
Compared to
Brands Hatch - Noise Level 105db Evening 102db Grand Prix 101db
Cadwell Park - Noise Level 105db
Donnington Park - Noise Level 105db Evening/Wkend 98db
Oulton Park - Noise Level 105db strictly enforced
Snetterton - Noise Level: 105db
so i say well done to Croft!!! i really hope they take this matter further and hopefuly see commonsense prevail(although if were talking European Courts then we have no chance of commonsense what with straight cucumber laws e.t.c) )


Cheffy!!, langley park says...
8:28pm Tue 27 Jan 09

oh and a quote from one of the track day organisers, see below


No Limits -

"Most Croft trackdays are restricted to 100db. Static and rolling tests are carried out rigorously by the circuit staff throughout the day. If your bike is tested above the noise limit you will not be able to ride".







John race fan, dalton says...
8:42pm Tue 27 Jan 09

I think it was F1's at elvington that nailed the coffin and riled the locals and a going back a couple of years even croft didnt have to be so strict as they are now, Ive had friends go all the way back to Hampshire without getting on due to being a tad over. I think the good times we enjoyed a few years ago have gone.

the logical view, says...
9:06pm Tue 27 Jan 09

the simple wrote:
If all these people want this event to happen why don't they offer to buy the house from these people. How many hotels and pubs are used by people attending these events?
It's a shame that the case didn't appear to consider its true impact. How many times have our young people been advised not to use the roads as a racetrack, and to keep it for trackdays? And yet a company is punished for successfully attracting large nos. of people doing exactly that.

Will the complainers carry on doing so if street racing becomes more accessible than trackdays? I know what my money's on.

And to the poster - I'd be pleased to make an offer if the owner suggested a sensible figure. Not that this is liable to happen...

yella, lincoln says...
9:52pm Tue 27 Jan 09

Utter Disgrace, this countries legal system and judges are pathetic !!

How can the voice of 3 out way the popularity of thousands, What a joke.

I presume once they have gained there cash they will move away from the circuit anyway.


Dave Ladders, London says...
9:37am Wed 28 Jan 09

This is just typical of this country. Typical of the compensation culture that's hitting the place as well and the everyones to blame, no such thing as an accident way of thinking thats developed.

The biggest problem are these judges who live in different world to the rest of us. Half of them live in a bubble and haven't a clue what living in the real world is like. Any normal person would throw them out of court as soon as they heard the circumstances.

I grew up living within earshot of Mallory Park and it was one of those noises you grew up with and didn't give a second thought. The last place I lived at had a train track at the bottom of the garden. Could you imagine the response I'd get if I tried to sue BR for the noise! Why is this any different!

I think there should be a run organised to show what the general public think of these people, and sit outside these idiots house every Sunday for a month, and rev our engines.

Marktrack, Luton says...
11:28am Wed 28 Jan 09

I do hope someone passes this thread onto our sports minister, then he can understand why we start to deteriate further in World Motorsport events. He can then let the roads and transports ministers have a look to see why the accident rates have gone up on the roads!! We had better also cancel the Olympics, because after the event, none of the stadia and facilities will be viable to run because some money grabbing parasite will say they are too noisy.

analytical, Darlington says...
5:09pm Wed 28 Jan 09

What a sheer act of vengeance and greed. It's a real shame Jimmy Wilson sold the properties to his in-laws in 1990. Why has the right to appeal been refused? This has such far reaching implications as a result of some dim witted judges. Nuisance noise, well so far it has not halted the progress of Heathrows 3rd runway-funny that.

raybould00, Dalton-on-Tees says...
5:39pm Thu 29 Jan 09

I am amazed at the comments from all the locals (Leeds, Luton, Lundon, Stockton etc who can all hear the noise) who blame the people living near the circuit for its possible demise. If Croft circuit had worked with the people regarding noise and some level of control this would never have occurred.
I have lived near the circuit since 1987. The circuit was basically closed from 1981 and only re-opend in 1993 under much wrangling, not to say it cost locals thousands of pounds trying to get reasonable use and control of how the circuit was to operate.
I speak for myself and I do not want the circuit to close, the events are not the main problem as the noise is intermittent, it is the track days, testing and open days which occur during the week and weekends where the noise is constant for hours, with the only break around lunchtime, the events are only a small part of the problem with the operation of the circuit such as traffic control and parking.
The tracks day raised my greatest concern. The would be boy racers do not leave the racing on the circuit they take it on the road to and from the circuit, so much for track events getting the boy racers off the road, from my experience it only fed their desire to race along west lane, doing wheelies and handbrake turns into and out of the circuit entrance, just check out the tyre marks if you don’t believe.
Also 100db is between a road drill & Jet engine, just to put it in prospective. How would you like that noise in your back garden?
Plus most who go to the circuit camp out and bring there own carry out. Pity I do not have land otherwise I could open it up for camping.

raybould00, Dalton-on-Tees says...
8:27pm Thu 29 Jan 09

Forgot to mention the only thing this ruling does is cost the circuit money which will not even dent the pockets of the backers. As for the reduction in events, this is not true as from 1993 there was always a restriction on noise level and number of days. N1, N2, N3, N4, N5. Just ask Richmond District Council and they will advise number of days per N level. All these comments about closing the circuit NOT TRUE. Just people trying to fuel the embers. WHY??????????

Marktrack, Luton says...
12:47pm Fri 30 Jan 09

The only problem with having comments on line this is people who think they know things but actually don´t! raybouldoo you are right about the different noise levels on days at Croft, but completely wrong in what the circuit WILL be able to run in the future. 75 percent of people do not ride to croft for trackday events, 100db is measure within 18 inches of the exhaust(road legal is 98db) the noise from Croft on a day with 25 bikes at 100db is so low its unbelievable anyone can hear it at all!!!
As for your remark if Croft had worked with people to get some level of control, that just goes to show how dangerous a little information is! Croft is by far one of the best behaved and most co operative circuits in the whole country where noise is concerned.

sam919, dundee says...
12:58am Sat 31 Jan 09

Does anyone think they will live there for much longer, hardly going to go to the Checkers for a pint are they!

What happens if they move, does it all go back to normal?


chris allanson, aldbrough says...
12:48am Thu 5 Feb 09

OK some of you will know me im the boss of Z Cars ltd
we build all sorts of road and racing cars i also have a moto cross practice track on our farm where we rent the facility to members of the public to use their bikes on
do you realise that the ROAD going noise limit for a car when tested at the ministry is 101 db at three quarters throttle
we build cars and take them for SVA testing on a regular basis so i know this is the accepted limit
if croft are testing to 100 db then the cars are quieter than a normal road car should be
we have a single protester who lives 1 mile away from our moto cross track
she complains to the council on a regular basis
they have tried to verify her complaints by monitering the noise levels coming from our track but cant because the onluy time she is affected is when the wind blows from the north directly towards her
the predominant wingd direction is from the south west and there is no way at all the bikes can be heard when its in that direction
she was asked to keep a diary of each day she heard the bikes and record the wind direction,religously every day according to her diary she could hear them she could even hear them in her house with the windows closed ??!!
because the council have to disclose evidence to me so i can comment i was able to prove that we were not open on days when she could hear us
i got the wind speed and direction records from the local gas plant weather station which are taken every 5 mins 24 hours a day and could prove she was also lying about wind direction
we opened after a 3 year planning application battle
she thought we had not had it granted and only started complaining after we had been open 6 months she realised when the wind was in the north for the first time and she asked a neighbour who is a mate of mine what the noise was
when she found out her first comment was "i will soon put a stop to that"
its an absolute nightmare as ive sunk £50000 of my own cash into the track and for the sake of one woman it could all be thrown away
i do however think that if the cars/bikes were made quieter by putting better silencers on them it would knock their argument a hell of a lot
i have to stop lads on our track from time to time and we try to quieten their bikes
it leads to friction between me as the owner of the site and the customer who wants to use it
they think you are having a go at them but in actual fact you are trying to keep everybody happy which is well nigh impossible
getting back to croft
i would like to know what long term noise tests were done on the affected premises
i presume that there was a noise difference between what is background noise and when the tracks being used
did the judge make any recommendations as to how much noise was acceptable
can croft build higher noise bunds up in the line of sight of the properties
noise bunds are very effective if built in the right place
its a shame for everyone at croft as i do like going there myself the people are friendly and its a cracking circuit
lastly ive always found our noise officials here very approachable when she astarted complaining about us i went along the lines of trying to mitigate as much noise as possible , we built higher bunds than the original plans required and have closed volountarily at 4 pm each day when i could go till 6 pm
i presume that croft are still ok with planning and they still have planning permission
if thats the case then they should be able to work something out by redicing the noise emitted from each vehicle
if the go down to 97 db it is evvectively half the noise at 100 db
noise measuring is a queer thing its calculated so that every 3 db is actually a doubling of the noise
i hope they sort it
chris

Your sayYour North-East

comment Add your comment

Register for a FREE The Northern Echo account and you can have your say on today's news and sport by adding comments on articles we publish. The best comments may even get published in the paper.

Please register now or sign in below to continue.

Best of British Rallycross at Croft circuit Best of British Rallycross at Croft circuit

Local Advertisers

Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »