Villagers' joy as opencast plans defeated

Villagers' joy as opencast plans defeated

OPENCAST MINE PROTEST: Protesters picket outside County Hall in Durham. Picture: DAVID WOOD (7235097)

OPENCAST MINE PROTEST: Protesters picket outside County Hall in Durham. Picture: DAVID WOOD (7235099)

OPENCAST MINE PROTEST: Protesters picket outside County Hall in Durham. Picture: DAVID WOOD (7235103)

OPENCAST MINE PROTEST: Protesters picket outside County Hall in Durham. Picture: DAVID WOOD (7235101)

First published in News

VILLAGERS are celebrating after winning a “David and Goliath” battle to save open countryside near their homes from being mined for coal.

Durham County Council had been widely expected to give Hargreaves Surface Mining the go-ahead to opencast up to 514,000 tonnes of coal and 83,000 tonnes of fireclay from 56 hectares of farmland east of Durham City today (Tuesday, June 17).

But following a vociferous protest on the steps of County Hall and an impassioned debate lasting nearly two hours, the council’s county planning committee voted by 12 to one to throw out the proposals, which relate to a site known as Field House.

Afterwards, Denise Harland, chairwoman of the Stop The Opencast Between Pittington and West Rainton campaign, said: “We’re extremely pleased that they weighed up the arguments and voted overwhelmingly in our favour.

“They thought more of local communities, people and businesses than big business coming in for a relatively short time and destroying our lives. We’re very pleased with the outcome.”

However, the battle may not be over, as a Hargreaves spokesman said the Esh Winning-based firm would consider an appeal.

“We’re surprised and disappointed by today’s decision by the planning committee, despite the strong recommendation to approve by their planning team,” he said.

Hargreaves had said the project would create and support jobs, boost local businesses, benefit communities and they would have engaged with local concerns.

However, nearly 250 people wrote to the council to object.

Local county councillor Stephen Guy, a former miner, said an opencast would affect people’s health and damage tourism; David Turnbull, chair of Pittington Parish Council, said it would represent an unacceptable physical and visual desecration of the landscape; and Cllr Paul Taylor, a committee member, said it would be wanton vandalism of a wonderful green area, offering no benefits.

Steven McQuarrie, Hargreaves’ land director, said the scheme had been carefully designed, many supported it and there was no reason for the committee to refuse it.

However, councillors lined up to disagree, with only Cllr Richie Young voting in favour.

The plans first emerged 18 months ago. Mining would have lasted for 26 months, possibly starting as early as this summer.

Comments (2)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

3:23pm Wed 18 Jun 14

Sunderpitt says...

Well done the 11 Councillors who voted against it, shame on the one Councillor who voted for and shame on the Planning Officers whose report acted as cheerleaders for this proposal. If this had gone through it would have set a precedent and many more would follow. Durham does not need nor want opencast mining on greenbelt land.
Well done the 11 Councillors who voted against it, shame on the one Councillor who voted for and shame on the Planning Officers whose report acted as cheerleaders for this proposal. If this had gone through it would have set a precedent and many more would follow. Durham does not need nor want opencast mining on greenbelt land. Sunderpitt
  • Score: -7

1:51pm Fri 20 Jun 14

RealismMan says...

I am just getting ready to send each objector to this development an exercise bike with a dynamo attached.

The electricity supply can be disconnected from Durham and leave more for the rest of the country. They might realise when it takes 2 hrs to boil the kettle then decisions on nationally important development are best left to the experts (the professionals in our overworked gov. departments).

We're all sorry they do not like living in an area where coal reserves are located, I live in an area where sand and gravel reserves are located. There are vociferous objectors against mining them as well. However we need those reserves also.

They object against wind farms, they object against housing developments, they object against opencast, they object aginst solar farms, they object against (add a development type here)

LULU – Locally Unwanted Land Use.

NIMBY – Not In My Back Yard.

NOPE – Not On Planet Earth

BANANA – Build Absolutely Nothing Anywhere Near Anything

Take your pick, unfortunately they fit into one of the acronyms.
I am just getting ready to send each objector to this development an exercise bike with a dynamo attached. The electricity supply can be disconnected from Durham and leave more for the rest of the country. They might realise when it takes 2 hrs to boil the kettle then decisions on nationally important development are best left to the experts (the professionals in our overworked gov. departments). We're all sorry they do not like living in an area where coal reserves are located, I live in an area where sand and gravel reserves are located. There are vociferous objectors against mining them as well. However we need those reserves also. They object against wind farms, they object against housing developments, they object against opencast, they object aginst solar farms, they object against (add a development type here) LULU – Locally Unwanted Land Use. NIMBY – Not In My Back Yard. NOPE – Not On Planet Earth BANANA – Build Absolutely Nothing Anywhere Near Anything Take your pick, unfortunately they fit into one of the acronyms. RealismMan
  • Score: 5

Comments are closed on this article.

Send us your news, pictures and videos

Most read stories

Local Info

Enter your postcode, town or place name

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree