Union and MP make last-minute appeal to save hundreds of Durham public sector jobs at risk

Land Registry workers at Durham during a 2011 strike

Land Registry workers at Durham during a 2011 strike

First published in News The Northern Echo: Photograph of the Author by , Reporter (Durham)

UNION leaders and an MP have pleaded with the Government to save hundreds of public sector jobs at risk in the North-East.

A Department for Business, Innovation and Skills (DBIS) consultation on the future of the Land Registry ended last night (Thursday, March 20), with critics warning of privatisation, huge job cuts, loss of confidence and higher charges for the public.

The 150-year-old institution, which handles land and property data, employs 4,400 civil servants across the country, including 440 at Southfield Way, Durham City.

Kim Lowes, chair of the Public and Commercial Services (PCS) union’s Durham branch, said: “Staff are fearful and apprehensive. We don’t know where we’re going. There’s a genuine fear for jobs.”

Durham City MP Roberta Blackman-Woods said: “I want the Government to drop these proposals, which I think are a move towards privatisation.”

The consultation included several options including part-privatisation and letting a private firm run the Registry as a Government-owned organisation.

Ms Lowes said the Registry was working well, the envy of the world and self-financing, making nearly £100m profit for the Treasury last year.

She claimed a Government-run company would soon be privatised, leading to lower standards, a loss of confidence from lawyers and in the housing sector and higher charges for the public.

The consultation should have included a “status quo” option, she said.

Dr Blackman-Woods said: “The Land Registry deals with very, very sensitive information.

“All the professional bodies are saying the system works well and people have faith and confidence in it. If it’s not broken, why fix it?

“It works well and it’s returning money to the Treasury, so it’s not an austerity issue. It has to be an ideological issue, and that’s not good enough.”

A spokesman for DBIS, which has said full privatisation is not being considered at this stage, said giving the Registry more flexibility would enable it to become a leader in digitising land and property services and support wider economic growth.

He declined to say when a decision on its future would be announced, saying only a formal response to the consultation would be published “as soon as possible”.

He also refused to give any promises over the Durham office, saying: “No decision will be taken on the future commercial model for Land Registry until the consultation is completed and all responses have been considered.

“It is impossible to fully understand any impact on staff until then.”

Comments (3)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

5:39pm Fri 21 Mar 14

Tommy wits says...

This would be the same MP who voted to privatise National Savings . Which holds a lot more sensitive information. Also her party moved hundreds on National Savings work to India. All wind and pith.
This would be the same MP who voted to privatise National Savings . Which holds a lot more sensitive information. Also her party moved hundreds on National Savings work to India. All wind and pith. Tommy wits
  • Score: 2

9:31pm Fri 21 Mar 14

spottycow says...

Well said Tommy wits . Shes a two faced TW-T LABOUR MP
Well said Tommy wits . Shes a two faced TW-T LABOUR MP spottycow
  • Score: 1

2:53pm Sat 22 Mar 14

cushybutterfield says...

Just think of the 'Hundreds of Thousands of British Jobs' lost abroad during the past decade. On the other hand lets be honest, although it is **wrong and a shocking disgrace and 'to British people;,some employers consider by moving abroad,, they are free from being 'repeatedly clobbered and shafted' by certain British 'Strike happy,' Trade Union' (many strikes absolutely unnecessary triggered off by' left wing orientated political mad-agitator strikers'), and 'Go-Slow' disputes' (God can some go any slower?) and that's ONE of the reasons (not all of course) they shuffle off abroad with a big broad smile on their face................
You don't believe it ? Well consider the pathetic 'Trade Union Strike' at ***Grangemouth, Scotland which virtually put thousands of decent hardworking 'Working' people on free dole benefits who WANTED to work.
Just think of the 'Hundreds of Thousands of British Jobs' lost abroad during the past decade. On the other hand lets be honest, although it is **wrong and a shocking disgrace and 'to British people;,some employers consider by moving abroad,, they are free from being 'repeatedly clobbered and shafted' by certain British 'Strike happy,' Trade Union' (many strikes absolutely unnecessary triggered off by' left wing orientated political mad-agitator strikers'), and 'Go-Slow' disputes' (God can some go any slower?) and that's ONE of the reasons (not all of course) they shuffle off abroad with a big broad smile on their face................ You don't believe it ? Well consider the pathetic 'Trade Union Strike' at ***Grangemouth, Scotland which virtually put thousands of decent hardworking 'Working' people on free dole benefits who WANTED to work. cushybutterfield
  • Score: 1

Comments are closed on this article.

Send us your news, pictures and videos

Most read stories

Local Info

Enter your postcode, town or place name

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree