Region's railways among poorest in the country, says research

RAILWAYS in the North-East are among the worst-performing in the country, according to research published today (Monday, December 9).

Consultants Credo and the Campaign for Better Transport (CBT) hailed services in Scotland, London, the North-West and the West Midlands.

But a relatively sparse rail network in the North-East means services are less accessible in the region.

The survey also suggests devolving rail franchises to local decision-makers, something a partnership of northern councils has already lobbied the Government for.

CBT chief executive Stephen Joseph said: “The research exposes the huge disparities in the quality of train services across the country.

“Importantly, it suggests the answer is to give local administrations more control over their rail networks.

“By devolving more decision making we can make full use of local knowledge and target investment where it will bring the biggest benefits.

Credo’s transport practice director Matt Lovering said: “The research highlights important issues for rail right across the country.

“For the south east, it reveals how much the London economy relies on the trains, but also the increasing disquiet among commuters at the cost of getting to work.

“There’s strong performance in the West Midlands and the north west showing the benefits of the investments made there.

“The east of England, on the other hand, scores much less well, raising questions about how rail can best support the region’s burgeoning economy.

The Department for Transport’s franchising director, Peter Wilkinson, said: “This study raises important issues about the relative performance of the rail industry across the UK.

“There are challenges for all regions in improving the performance of our railways.

“We, the industry and local government must consider how we best work together to tackle the issues this report raises.”

A spokesman for the Rail Delivery Group, which speaks on behalf of the rail industry, said: “While there is always room for improvement, rail passengers are travelling on services that are unrecognisably better when compared to 15 years ago.

“Passenger satisfaction is at a near record high with 500 million more journeys each year being rated good or satisfactory according to the independent passenger watchdog.”

Comments (3)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

11:48am Mon 9 Dec 13

Andyleigh says...

Do we have railways in the North? A quick inspection of the map shows that there are hardly any here anyway.
Do we have railways in the North? A quick inspection of the map shows that there are hardly any here anyway. Andyleigh

12:55pm Mon 9 Dec 13

cholmes005 says...

Andyleigh wrote:
Do we have railways in the North? A quick inspection of the map shows that there are hardly any here anyway.
Yeah too right. Theres basicully railways on either side of the coast (cumbrian and north east) and nothing in the middle thanks to the beeching cuts. Look at all the towns of sizeable population in North east with no station: peterlee, Spennymoor, Consett, Washington etc
[quote][p][bold]Andyleigh[/bold] wrote: Do we have railways in the North? A quick inspection of the map shows that there are hardly any here anyway.[/p][/quote]Yeah too right. Theres basicully railways on either side of the coast (cumbrian and north east) and nothing in the middle thanks to the beeching cuts. Look at all the towns of sizeable population in North east with no station: peterlee, Spennymoor, Consett, Washington etc cholmes005

3:29pm Mon 9 Dec 13

Andyleigh says...

cholmes005 wrote:
Andyleigh wrote:
Do we have railways in the North? A quick inspection of the map shows that there are hardly any here anyway.
Yeah too right. Theres basicully railways on either side of the coast (cumbrian and north east) and nothing in the middle thanks to the beeching cuts. Look at all the towns of sizeable population in North east with no station: peterlee, Spennymoor, Consett, Washington etc
Washington could, I believe, be reconnected, possibly via the Tyneside Metro as the mothballed Leamside line runs that way. It also runs right next to the Durham park and ride at Belmont. Surely it is not beyond the wit of local authorities to join the dots? Small start.
Also, Peterlee can't be that far from the coastal line.
[quote][p][bold]cholmes005[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Andyleigh[/bold] wrote: Do we have railways in the North? A quick inspection of the map shows that there are hardly any here anyway.[/p][/quote]Yeah too right. Theres basicully railways on either side of the coast (cumbrian and north east) and nothing in the middle thanks to the beeching cuts. Look at all the towns of sizeable population in North east with no station: peterlee, Spennymoor, Consett, Washington etc[/p][/quote]Washington could, I believe, be reconnected, possibly via the Tyneside Metro as the mothballed Leamside line runs that way. It also runs right next to the Durham park and ride at Belmont. Surely it is not beyond the wit of local authorities to join the dots? Small start. Also, Peterlee can't be that far from the coastal line. Andyleigh

Comments are closed on this article.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree