Shotgun incident farmer's anger over police investigation

First published in News

AN INQUIRY has been launched into how police investigated a farmer for firing a shotgun at a thief on his land.

Bill Edwards, of Riggs Head, near Scarborough, said he had made a formal complaint to North Yorkshire Police after being arrested and accused of attempted murder by the force following the incident in August.

He and his mother, Louisa Smith, discovered thieves had returned to their farm overlooking the North York Moors for the second time in 24 hours, and after one of the intruders drove a car towards his mother, Mr Edwards fired a shotgun at the vehicle.

Police arrested one of the thieves a few miles away, but also held the farmer and his mother in a cell overnight.

After spending four months on bail, the Crown Prosecution Service said Mr Edwards would not be charged with an offence as "people are entitled to use reasonable force in self-defence to defend themselves, their family and their property”.

David Taylor, 39, of Scarborough, admitted theft at Scarborough Magistrates Court earlier this month and was fined £100, after claiming to have been “traumatised” when Mr Edwards opened fire on the van.

Taylor was ordered to pay £34.99 for the damage caused to the farm gate and padlock while trying to escape.

Mr Edwards said he and his mother had been made to feel like criminals and issued the complaint as he wanted answers about how the police had conducted the case.

A spokesman for North Yorkshire Police said the complaint would be dealt with by the force’s Professional Standards Department.

He said: “As the force has received a formal complaint regarding the way the investigation of the incident was handled, it would not be appropriate to comment at this stage.”

Comments (3)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

5:19pm Wed 16 Jan 13

Guns Save Lives says...

Traumatised! I should hope so, should be the least of it. He should have 6 months hard labour on the farm, not just a pathetic fine.
Traumatised! I should hope so, should be the least of it. He should have 6 months hard labour on the farm, not just a pathetic fine. Guns Save Lives
  • Score: 0

7:00pm Wed 16 Jan 13

stevegg says...

Political correctness gone mad! Once again an example of how the offender has all the rights. What a complete waste of time, money and resources. Despite all the spin to the contrary by the government, the victim will always be treated worse than the offender for having the cheek to defend themselves! Our laws and PC police are becoming a laughing stock and totally ineffective. The scales of justice are still weighted far to much in favour of the offender proved by this ludicrous arrest and the offenders so called sentance!
Political correctness gone mad! Once again an example of how the offender has all the rights. What a complete waste of time, money and resources. Despite all the spin to the contrary by the government, the victim will always be treated worse than the offender for having the cheek to defend themselves! Our laws and PC police are becoming a laughing stock and totally ineffective. The scales of justice are still weighted far to much in favour of the offender proved by this ludicrous arrest and the offenders so called sentance! stevegg
  • Score: 0

12:07pm Thu 17 Jan 13

ian923 says...

1. The thief should have got a much much more severe sentence instead of a slap on the wrist. Sentences like this do not deter thieves.
2. There was no need to arrest Mr Edwards and his mother unless they refused to co-operate with police by being interviewed and giving statements.Police action here is "over the top" and an amount of compensation will have to be paid which could have been spent on operations. They(Mr Edwards and mother) were the complainants in this case after all.
1. The thief should have got a much much more severe sentence instead of a slap on the wrist. Sentences like this do not deter thieves. 2. There was no need to arrest Mr Edwards and his mother unless they refused to co-operate with police by being interviewed and giving statements.Police action here is "over the top" and an amount of compensation will have to be paid which could have been spent on operations. They(Mr Edwards and mother) were the complainants in this case after all. ian923
  • Score: 0

Comments are closed on this article.

Send us your news, pictures and videos

Most read stories

Local Info

Enter your postcode, town or place name

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree