THE hunting ban was introduced by Tony Blair and Hilary Armstrong, neither of whom voted for it, in order to buy off Labour MPs over the invasion of Iraq.
Mr Blair bet Prince Charles a tenner that hunting would continue ten years after the ban had come into force. He won his bet.
If that sounds disgraceful, then that is because it was.
But the ban’s almost total non-enforcement has become the most egregious example in many a long year of the different application of the law to certain classes and political persuasions rather than to others. Indeed, the police effectively act as escorts to many hunts.
That is why we ought to be disinclined to support repeal of the ban. Such repeal would declare that laws would simply be altered if the right sort of people refused to abide by them.
D Lindsay, Lanchester.
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel