THE Archbishop of Canterbury has called on Keir Starmer to end the “cruel” two-child benefit cap if he becomes prime minister.
The Most Reverend Justin Welby becomes the latest figure to make the demand – after a surprising intervention on similar lines by former Tory home secretary Suella Braverman.
He said the limit was “neither moral nor necessary” and it “falls short of our values as a society”.
Shadow health secretary Wes Streeting said he welcomed the Archbishop’s intervention but Labour could not promise to scrap the policy without being able to set out how to pay for it.
Welby framed his intervention, made in The Observer, as a plea to all parties to commit to scrapping the policy.
Prime Minister Rishi Sunak (below) has already committed to keep it if the Tories remain in power after the General Election while Keir Starmer has so far resisted calls to scrap it despite claiming ending child poverty is “central” to his plans for government.
The cap, which was introduced in 2017, restricts child tax credit and Universal Credit to the first two children in most households.
READ MORE: Labour make major admission on NHS
Streeting said he voted against the two-child limit “so by definition, I wish it wasn’t there”.
He told Sky News: “One of the consequences of the Conservatives’ disastrous handling of the economy is the public finances are in a mess and there are harder choices to make.
“So, unless and until I can sit on your programme and say ‘we will do X by funding it through Y’, that’s not a commitment I’m able to make today.”
He defended the Archbishop for speaking out on political matters, saying that “virtue signalling” is “literally his job”.
Streeting (above) said: “You’re never going to find, if there’s a Labour government, politicians being sent out to attack the Archbishop of Canterbury for virtue signalling, as Conservative MPs have done. It is literally his job. He’s the one person in the country whose job it is to signal virtue.
“If the mission of the church is not to alleviate poverty and suffering, then I don’t know what is.”
READ MORE: Drug experts 'keeping shtum' despite concerns about Tories' right to recovery bill
The Archbishop told the Observer: “The two-child limit falls short of our values as a society. It denies the truth that all children are of equal and immeasurable worth, and will have an impact on their long-term health, wellbeing and educational outcomes.”
The Archbishop’s intervention will increase pressure on Starmer to act if Labour comes into power.
The Labour leader was challenged on his position when he launched his “first steps” plan for office on Thursday.
He said tackling child poverty was “central to an incoming Labour government” but “what I can’t do is make promises that I can’t deliver on”.
The Archbishop of Canterbury (above) said: “This cruel policy is neither moral nor necessary.
“We are a country that can and should provide for those most in need, following the example of Jesus Christ, who served the poorest in society.
“As a meaningful step towards ending poverty, and recognising the growing concern across the political spectrum, I urge all parties to commit to abolishing the two-child limit.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel