PLANS to demolish a former greyhound stadium and build dozens of executive homes on the site are set to be approved despite objections from neighbouring villagers.

Durham County Council planning officers are recommending an area planning committee meeting next Tuesday grants permission to Charles Church to create build 47 homes at the former Easington Greyhound Stadium, near Easington Village.

Charles Church says the appearance will be that of a “village rural style”, with the layout showing a scheme of mainly detached, four and five bedroomed houses with off street parking and garaging, including five affordable homes.

The firm says Easington Greyhound Stadium ceased to be operational a number of years ago due to a significant fall in the popularity of the sport rendering the facility no longer economically viable.

A statement to the meeting adds: “The very specific use of the site has meant that it does not lend itself to conversion or alternative uses, consequently the site has remained a derelict eyesore since its closure with no reasonable prospect for regeneration without significant investment in its reclamation and redevelopment.

“This application therefore represents significant opportunity to revitalise the site through the delivery of a high-quality residential development meeting the current and future housing needs of the county whilst making efficient use of land through brownfield redevelopment.”

Easington Parish Council has objected, arguing the village will not be able to cope with the additional infrastructure required.

But Durham county councillor David Boyes, who represents the war, said in the wake of several other housing developments being granted permission recently, there are concerns the character of Easington Village could be changed forever.

He said: “I just think that Easington has taken its fair share of housing applications. There are some 2,500 homes which are either being build or on in the pipeline.

“It will change the shape and complexion of the village.”

Recommending approval senior planning officer Barry Gavillet said: “The proposals are close to established residential areas and within an acceptable distance to a good range of facilities and services in the village to serve the development.

“The scheme is considered to be good quality and in a sustainable location. There are no adverse impacts that would significantly and demonstrably outweigh the benefits.”