Referee the main target for frustrated Pools boss
Tranmere Rovers 3 Hartlepool United 1
IT'S SAID that sometimes in football
you don't get what you deserve:
a statement which Hartlepool
United will quite easily
support.
There's plenty of evidence to
back up their argument - defeats
this season at Leeds United, Nottingham
Forest and Carlisle
United to name three examples.
On Saturday, a fourth emerged
as Pools lost 3-1 at Tranmere.
Playing with ten men for almost
an hour after Jamie McCunnie
was sent-off, Pools went two
goals down, took the game to
Tranmere for the majority of the
second half, missed a penalty
which would have levelled the
scoreline and yet ended up losing.
But, for all their possession
and neat football - there were periods
in the second half when the
ten men were trailing and playing
keepball - it was the game's
big events which turned the
game against Pools.
A back header by Micky Nelson
fell short, McCunnie's attempted
touch didn't come off
and he brought down Ian Moore
inside the area. Penalty and red
card. The spot kick was saved,
but Chris Greenacre was there to
knock the rebound in.
Nelson sliced a Chris Shuker
cross with his right shin into his
own net as he attempted to clear.
And then, much to Danny Wilson's
chagrin, Antony Kay wasn't
disciplined by the referee
after chopping down Joel Porter
inside the area.
The penalty, taken by Tom
Craddock, was put wide.
Key events, key moments and
all went the way Pools didn't
need.
"I don't know how we have lost
that game being honest,'' reflected
Wilson. "They have had one
shot at goal before scoring a
penalty, score a second from a
miskick, we have conceded a
penalty and had a man sent off -
when we got a penalty there was
no sending off or even a yellow
card.
"I thought the referee was exceptionally
poor in lots of occasions,
the penalty decision especially.
How their man didn't even
get a yellow card at least when he
conceded it is bewildering.''
Referee Dean Whitestone was
the official in charge of Pools
penultimate game of the last
campaign at Rochdale, when he
sent off both Richard Barker and
Andy Monkhouse.
"We showed great character to
come back from two goals down,''
added the manager. "But again
we have the scenario when we get
a penalty and there is no card
shown, which, for the life of me,
I cannot fathom out.
"I've asked the referee and he
said it wasn't a sending-off, but
it might have been a booking - so
why wasn't it a booking?
"He gave some strange decisions.
Joel Porter was mullered
from the back every time when
he went up for a ball and how
many free-kicks did we get? You
could see the penalty coming because
Joel was giving them a
hard time - all we want is a fair
crack of the whip by the referee.
It was blatant and there was no
choice to give it, but the decisions
far outweighed in the home side.
"I am livid with the referee, he
had major decisions to make. Decisions
went against us, I find it
incredible he has come through
that performance and not expect
any criticism, he was very poor.
"We had him last season at
Rochdale, whether that is in the
mind I don't know. But I will say
on a different day, a different occasion,
a different season we had
the same outcome.''
Pools also conceded three goals
that day as well, but the big difference
was that on this occasion
they should have won. Tranmere
had the numerical advantage,
Pools had all the play.
After Ritchie Humphreys
scored at the far post, turning in
a Willie Boland cross, Pools were
well on top. The penalty would
have made it 2-2 and, as home
boss Ronnie Moore - whose side
were booed incessantly during
the second half - pointed out:
"We were lucky because if they
had scored it, they would have
probably gone on to win the
game. They controlled a game we
should have dominated.''
Craddock had no hesitation, in
the absence of regular taker
Barker, in grabbing the ball.
Wilson added: "Tom wanted
the penalty, he has scored many
in his young career so far. Maybe
the occasion got to him, my only
criticism is that he's just come on
the pitch a few minutes before
and he's not warmed up enough
if you like. Maybe other players
could have stepped up to the
plate.''
He added: "The lads were magnificent
and I mean magnificent.
"We dominated and shouldn't
have been two goals down in the
first place, it's not like we were
playing poorly, we were on top.
Tranmere were very fortunate.
"When that gift horse looks at
you, you have to take it. I'm not
criticising Tom in any way, I
thought he struck it quite well
and he put it wide - it happens.
"We deserved at least to come
back to 2-2, but it wasn't the case.
Tranmere enjoyed a charmed
life, but came out with a win.
"The lads were brilliant and to
look at the scoreline, you wouldn't
understand what has gone
on."
5:29pm Saturday 15th March 2008
Print 
Email this
Comment
What are these links for?
If you liked this article and would like to share it with others on the web who might be searching for good content we've made it easy for you to do it.
At the bottom of all articles, you'll see links to six sites. These sites - commonly called 'social bookmark' or 'social news' sites - have large communities of web users who share and rate interesting, useful and fun things on the web.
Clicking the links will automatically add the address of the story you are reading to one of these sites, letting you share it with others. Each site will ask you to register to share stories. Registration is free and once a member, you can store, recommend and search for stories that interest you.
More on Digg
More on del.icio.us
More on Furl
More on reddit
More on NowPublic/
More on Yahoo!