Darlington RSS Feed


Call for public input as Cockerton Library faces closure

UNDER THREAT: Cockerton Library UNDER THREAT: Cockerton Library

EIGHT councillors from three different wards are asking for public input into what could be the final chapter of a village library.

A public meeting will be held for the 10,000 users of Cockerton library to give their views about the potential closure of the facility because of council cuts.

Darlington Borough Council has proposed to close the library to save £100,000 per year as part of its multi-million pound savings following the reduction in Government grants. It would subsequently sell the building, which was opened in September 1970.

Although the council is running a public consultation exercise to discuss the various cuts, councillors from Cockerton West, Cockerton East and Pierremont have decided to hold their own public meeting to gauge the view of residents and library users.

Jan Cossins, Cockerton West councillor, said: "Obviously we do not want any of these cuts. We did not become councillors to close things.

"Personally I do not want it to close. My grandson goes to Cockerton School and they use the library. We are holding the meeting to gauge the public feeling."

Suggestions have been made that friends groups or community partnerships could help run the library.

Coun Cossins, whose daughter is a librarian in Manchester, believes that could only be a last resort.

She said: "The thought of getting staff back as volunteers sticks in the throat. If push came to shove that is what we would hopefully do.

"But you still need a professional librarian to run a library."

Councillor Linda Hughes, from Pierremont, said the meeting had been called following residents' requests.

She added: "The calls I am getting from people, right across the town not just in the three wards, is they want a library service in Cockerton. A lot of people use the library and then the shops."

Council data shows that 10,000 people used the library last year. Of those, 4,385 lived within ten minutes walk. The analysis showed 95 per cent of those would still be able to access the main library via public transport.

A council spokeswoman said: "If the library does close, the council will continue to provide a comprehensive library service from Crown Street and the mobile library, which operates across the borough.

"It would be anticipated that the mobile library would spend more time in the Cockerton area, if the library were to close. It is important to stress, however, that no decision has yet been taken on this or any other budget proposal."

The public meeting will take place next Thursday, at 6.30pm in Cockerton Methodist Church Hall.

Comments(8)

Shirley Burnham says...
1:56pm Thu 8 Dec 11

Councillor Hughes is quoted, saying "The calls I am getting from people, right across the town not just in the three wards, is they want a library service in Cockerton. A lot of people use the library and then the shops."
.
Traders and the Chamber of Commerce can help with the fight to keep this library. Its loss will impact on them, too. When people have to travel to another library, they take their custom elsewhere and business dies.

MST75 says...
4:02pm Thu 8 Dec 11

Cut the number of Councillors by 50%, and the remaing expenses by 50%, and they will have more than £100k, next step sack the Chief Exec, and employ someone who has a clue on how to rn a business, then see services improve and costs reduced.

sarahd says...
8:22pm Thu 8 Dec 11

There are a number of empty buildings/shops in cockerton for sale, why do they think they will be able to sell the library. If they can't manage to sell it then they will spend an fortune over the years on the up keep of the empty building.

Darlo72 says...
10:30pm Thu 8 Dec 11

Whilst it would be unfortunate to lose a library in the town, the main library will still be maintained. I would however challenge why Darlington needs to maintain 24 wards and 53 councillors to service said wards. On top of the nearly 5,000 people the borough council employs I think that leaders of the council should look to improve efficiencies and eliminate waste before cutting services.

GeorgeAlexander says...
11:56pm Thu 8 Dec 11

5000 staff, nearer 3000.
Yes cutting Councillors by 22% (ish) would save £100k but the amount of Councillors permitted is set by Central Govt.
Instead of throwing bricks why not put yourselves forward at the next election if you think you can do better?
Darlington is one of the most poorly served towns in England for library service for the size of population.

benthompson says...
10:16am Fri 9 Dec 11

I'm not quite sure what the analysis of journey times actually shows:-

1) It is based on old data and so does not reflect any changes in bus routes or time since it was created.

2) It assumes that people have access to public transport. Now admittedly anyone of pensionable age will have a bus pass but for everyone else the £3 or £4 it costs for a return journey into the town centre makes a visit to the library prohibitively expensive.

As for the comment on needing a professional librarian that is at least one comment I can agree on. Given the options the councillors seem to want to force on us do we however need a full time one.

I do look forward to the meeting on next Thursday. I hope the councillors will be as prepared as I am.

benthompson says...
10:16am Fri 9 Dec 11

I'm not quite sure what the analysis of journey times actually shows:-

1) It is based on old data and so does not reflect any changes in bus routes or time since it was created.

2) It assumes that people have access to public transport. Now admittedly anyone of pensionable age will have a bus pass but for everyone else the £3 or £4 it costs for a return journey into the town centre makes a visit to the library prohibitively expensive.

As for the comment on needing a professional librarian that is at least one comment I can agree on. Given the options the councillors seem to want to force on us do we however need a full time one.

I do look forward to the meeting on next Thursday. I hope the councillors will be as prepared as I am.

Optimistic1 says...
12:49pm Fri 9 Dec 11

I am truly concerned by the potential closure of a service that is so viable and to some sections of the community essential! It's widely accepted that savings need to be made but is it not for our Councillors, and moreso those Council Officers that are the authors of these Cabinet Reports, to look to under-utilised services when identifying potential savings? To me that is a fair way of identifying where savings can and possibly should be made.

In terms of impact on the community I would be interested to better understand the use of libraries v the municipal golf course? I know plenty of people that visit libraries in town, however few that frequent the golf course!

After reading the Cabinet Report of 22 November 2011, I am struggling to understand why this service is even being considered for closure. Darlington appears to compare well nationally, i.e. "The fifth highest active borrower rate amongst all the English unitary authorities." The Cabinet Report also mentions the good use of the range of audio books and, "...a significant level of usage from people with physical disabilities." Just two reasons why the service should continue...

Not all are fortunate enough to own a computer, let alone be able to pay a monthly broadband connection fee. Apparently, "... the public access computers in all three libraries are used for almost 80,000 sessions per year..."

I hope this public meeting is well attended and that it is not used as a forum for 'Councillor-bashing'
, which will detract from what I think should be the key objectives about saving jobs and a worthwhile and well-used community service!

click2find

Most popular


About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree