End NHS Injustice RSS Feed


John Pagella takes fight to PM

PLEA TO NO. 10: John and Kathy Pagella PLEA TO NO. 10: John and Kathy Pagella

A CANCER sufferer who was told he was an ideal patient for a new drug wants to meet Prime Minister David Cameron after the NHS turned down a funding application from one of the top specialists in Europe.

John Pagella, 76, suffers from a rare form of bone marrow cancer, known as myelodysplastic syndroms (MDS), for which there is no cure.

The retired businessman knows that without new drug azacitidine, which has been shown to extend life by nine months – his health will deteriorate.

While azacitidine is widely available in Europe and the US, so far, the drug-vetting agency Nice (National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence) has provisionally ruled that the drug – which costs more than £45,000 a year per patient – is not cost effective.

“My consultant wants to nip this in the bud before I go downhill and my need for blood transfusions increases,” said Mr Pagella, who lives in Bolam, near Darlington.

Despite an application for funding by Professor Ghulan Mufti, one of the most eminent MDS experts in Europe, County Durham Primary Care Trust’s Exceptional Circumstances Committee has turned down the request.

Mr Pagella, who was diagnosed with MDS in 2003, plans to write to the PM requesting a meeting to discuss his case.

He said: “He (Prof Mufti) told me it is ideal for me, yet a committee of a GP, a public health doctor and a few NHS administrators has rejected his recommendation.

“It makes a mockery of what the professor is trying to do, which is to extend the lives of his patients.”

His wife, Kathy, said: “When you consider we have both worked all of our lives and paid into the NHS, what is the NHS for, where is it when you need it?”

Related links

The couple are now hoping that they could be some of the first to benefit from the Government’s plan to make it easier to get access to cancer drug funding, which is due to start next month.

The Government is planning to make an interim sum of £50m available across England to meet the demand from patients.

However, it is not clear whether new committees to assess claims will have the ability to overrule Nice recommendations.

There is also a glimmer of hope that Nice could change its decision.

Recently, MDS specialists from 32 hospitals across Europe wrote to the National Cancer Director to support better patient access to azacitidine in England.

And earlier this summer, the MDS UK Patient Support Group was one of eight organisations to present a 655 signature petition to 10 Downing Street urging the Prime Minister to persuade Nice to change its mind about azacitidine.

Yesterday, a spokeswoman for Nice said they were due to re-appraise azacitidine at a meeting on November 4 and a decision would be announced within four to six weeks.

A spokeswoman for NHS County Durham and Darlington said last night it was unable to comment on individual cases, but added: “At this time, the North of England Cancer Drugs Approvals Group, the Scottish Medicines Consortium and Nice have not approved Vidaza (azacitidine) for use in the North- East, NHS Scotland or in England.

“However, in making decisions about funding treatments, we also ensure the treatment options made available to patients are directly related to their individual clinical condition or expected clinical benefits.

“Should a decision be made not to fund, all patients have the right of appeal to an independent appeals panel.”

Comments(4)

Dean M says...
2:32pm Mon 13 Sep 10

Have I got the facts right? He's a 76 year-old man with terminal cancer, and he thinks the taxpayer should fork out nearly £40,000 to extend his life by a few weeks? This money could pay for a nurse, a P.C. or a teacher, or refurbish a primary school etc. It makes no economic sense to spend this kind of money on this type of case.
.
As sad as it is mate, take it on the chin - you've made it to 76 but your time is now up.

l.swallow says...
6:25pm Mon 13 Sep 10

Dean M I find your comments about this patient heartless. This man and his wife have obviously worked hard all their lives and paid into the NHS so deserve the drugs to prolong his life no matter how long he gets from the treatment. I wonder if it were one of your family if you would be so flippant with your views and comments. There would be plenty of money in the pot for cancer sufferers to get these drugs if doctors did not continue to allow work shy people to claim sickness benefits when there is nothing at all wrong with them. Those are the people who are a waste of money and time wasted in doctor's surgeries feigning illness to get huge sums of money every week at the expence of sick people.How many schools could be built with that money?

simmo3578 says...
8:16pm Mon 13 Sep 10

@ Dean M, you might want to think again and retract that statement, as has been said, what if a family member of yours required life prolonging drugs? What a stupid thing to say you moron!

Dean M says...
9:04pm Mon 13 Sep 10

Well, that's got the debate going!
.
Obviously if it was me or a member of my family then I think the taxpayer should fund up to, let's see, £10 million for every extra hour that life can be prolonged. Fair enough? Somehow, I don't think that the NHS would agree.
.
I do accept that it is easy for me to say 'take it on the chin' when it is not me in this position. All I can say there is that I would hope that if I do reach the age of 76, am unfortunate enough to then develop terminal cancer, and can only prolong my life for a few months at a cost of £40,000 to the taxpayer, that I would opt to 'take it on the chin', decline, and bow out gracefully. But yes, that is easy for me to say now.
.
There has to be a line drawn somewhere, funding is limited, and choosing to spend public money in one area means it can't be spent in another. Tough decisions have to be made and as sad as this case is (which I made clear earlier), I don't think the benefit justifies the cost.

click2find

Most popular


About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree