News RSS Feed Send your news, pictures & videos


Tribunal victory for sacked Teesside Hospice workers

CASE BACKED: Michael Wilkinson with the tribunal ruling CASE BACKED: Michael Wilkinson with the tribunal ruling

TWO transport workers sacked by a North-East hospice have had their case for unfair dismissal upheld by an employment tribunal.

Ron Edwards, 55, of Stockton, and Michael Wilkinson, 50, of Middlesbrough, have spoken of their relief following the ruling.

Mr Edwards worked as a van driver for Teesside Hospice Trading Limited, which trades to raise money on behalf of the Middlesbrough hospice, and Mr Wilkinson as a van assistant, helping to load and unload vans between shops.

In August 2010, Mr Edwards was accused of not taking reasonable care of £500 that had apparently gone missing from the hospice’s Coulby Newham shop. The money was found in his van.

Both were accused of going on unauthorised detours, and Mr Wilkinson of taking two ladders belonging to the hospice without permission.

They were sacked following an investigation and both lost appeals.

However, an employment tribunal in August last year heard that the hospice trading company accepted there was no allegation of dishonesty in relation to the missing money, and chief executive Maureen Thompson, when questioned, conceded Mr Edwards had done nothing wrong.

The tribunal was also shown a copy of an email from Ms Thompson to a friend who was said to be a human resources advisor.

The email, which predated all the allegations that resulted in the pair being sacked, said: “We have a troublesome member of staff... basically Bill (Bill Gould, hospice chairman) thinks we should just finish the guy.”

It also referred to health and safety concerns raised by Mr Edwards and asked: “Our question would be, do you think we could sack him if he continues to waste senior staff time?”

The tribunal ruled that both men were unfairly dismissed.

It said: “The emails and the note from Maureen Thompson clearly indicate that there was a pre-existing intention to seek to try to find a reason to dismiss (Ron Edwards)...The tribunal is satisfied that there was an apparent bias in the way in which his hearing was handled.”

The report said the investigation into Mr Wilkinson was inadequate and he was simply “caught up in (the hospice’s) wish to dismiss” Mr Edwards.

It said Mr Wilkinson acknowledged he should have asked senior staff for permission to borrow the ladders, which he said were for a decorating job.

However, the tribunal found that Mr Edwards was culpable for the detours.

Mr Edwards said: “I was suicidal when these accusations were being made and it was a time when my mother died.”

Mr Wilkinson, who said he could not read or write, said: “It is difficult for me to find a job and this was something I was good at.

“I just wanted to be cleared and have my job back.”

A hospice spokesman said: “We are fully aware of the situation, but we are not in a position to comment at this time.”

The tribunal judgement was delayed and has only recently been released.

Comments(4)

Leylalou says...
9:51pm Sat 4 Feb 12

Disgraceful hope these guys need the hospice one day ! This is not the true story of what happened and the truth will come out ! Please continue to support the hospice

borocoffindodger says...
11:27am Mon 6 Feb 12

I believe that the truth must have come out at the tribunal. If the Hospice can afford to pay their legal fees with voluntary contributions then they can do so without mine. I have only just started to support them again after one of their managers was very rude to me a couple of years ago when I was buying several items at a stall in the Cleveland Centre. My husband and I cancelled both of our lottery standing orders explaining why and received a very rude letter in response.

Ahoy Tiny Crisp says...
12:30pm Mon 6 Feb 12

If your going to sack someone do it by the book. What else do they expect?

LouMac says...
8:58pm Mon 6 Feb 12

As long as the members of senior management that lied are now sacked or made to pay the legal fees and compensation (that no doubt will have been substantial) out of their own pockets, I see no reason to stop supporting the Hospice. If neither of these things happen then who can blame people who choose to leave their legacies and donations to another charity that uses the money for the purpose for which it was intended. As a charity, the full financial cost of this will have to be declared at the AGM so it can't be covered up.

click2find

Most popular


About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree