News RSS Feed Send your news, pictures & videos


Council chiefs accuse airport owners of broken promises

ANGRY council bosses last night accused the owners of Durham Tees Valley (DTV) airport of “reneging” on their promises ahead of a crunch decision on the loss-making airport’s future.

Peel Airports bosses are expected to decide in days whether to continue offering the business for sale or to call in administrators – a move that could spell the end of flights from the airport, at Middleton St George, near Darlington.

The airport’s mounting problems, and Peel’s reluctance to act, have stoked growing concern among the five local authorities with a minority shareholding in the business.

Last night, those frustrations boiled over when Stockton Borough Council issued a statement expressing the authority’s “deep disappointment”

that Peel had put the airport on the market when, 18 months earlier, the firm was planning to invest in the business.

Stockton Borough Council deputy leader Councillor Jim Beall said the council shared the views of many local businesses and residents who thought that no significant developments at the airport had been made since then.

Coun Beall also revealed that only days before the airport was put up for sale, Peel assured council bosses it had exciting plans for the future.

Five local authorities, Stockton, Darlington, Middlesbrough, Hartlepool and Durham County Council, sold a 75 per cent stake in the airport to Peel just over ten years ago. The deal, worth £500,000 as well as £100,000 towards the councils’ costs, was welcomed because a private operator would be able to invest more and redevelop the former RAF base into a passenger hub.

Peel agreed to spend £20m on the airport over five years.

The recession saw major airlines abandon the airport and a plunge in passenger numbers. Despite this, Peel assured councillors that it had a plan to rebuild the business, while at the same time quietly drawing up plans to sell it.

Coun Beall said: “We had been encouraged to hear a presentation about exciting turnaround plans from the regional director of the airport last December – and so were particularly disappointed to hear, less than a week later, that Peel Airports Ltd had put their shares up for sale.

“We hope that Peel Airports Ltd will find a buyer for their shares who will be able to commit to providing a busy and vibrant airport for the Tees Valley.”

Darlington council leader Bill Dixon said he shared Stockton council’s concerns.

He said: “Peel made certain commitments that have not been honoured. I would expect the company to either honour those commitments or sell the airport to someone who will.”

The Northern Echo understands that in July, the chief executive of Stockton council, Neil Schneider, wrote to Peel Airports on behalf of council shareholders asking a range of questions as to why the fortunes of the site did not match those of the group’s other airports, in particular airports in Doncaster and Liverpool.

He asked what efforts were being made to establish routes to popular, profitable destinations.

Local enterprise partnership Tees Valley Unlimited also invited Peel to a meeting to discuss its efforts to make the airport a success. No one from the company attended.

Last week, no one from Peel Holdings’ board attended Durham Tees Valley Airport’s consultative committee’s quarterly meeting.

It is believed a decision on the sale process will be made within a week, with the options including an extension of the sales period or the airport being placed into administration.

Alternatively, Peel Airports may try to buy back its shares from Vancouver Airport Services, putting it back in complete control.

When councils sold their majority stake, it was agreed that the councils’ remaining 25 per cent stake could be reduced if Peel invested money into the airport. Before Christmas, Peel said it planned to issue a shares dilution notice – increasing its shareholding at the councils’ expense as per the original agreement.

Mr Schneider said: “The local authorities believe that the process to find a buyer has now reached a critical point.

“I expect a dilution notice to be effected in a matter of weeks. I understand that the Peel Airports board is meeting on a weekly basis to make progress in trying to find a buyer. I would also expect that there is a limit to how long Peel Airports will carry on with their funding.”

Peel Airports did not respond to requests for a comment yesterday.

Comments(13)

oliviaden6 says...
8:31am Sat 28 Jan 12

A Airport surprisingly needs AIRCRAFT and PASSENGERS, from where i sit Peel have done nothing but cut the throat of the investors, their high charges for landing and handling were nearlyu on a par with Heathrow or Gatwick, that could not be justified so the airlines said enough is enough and pulled out, I used to fly into Tees every six to eight weeks and i always found the aircraft full and if you did not book early enough for your due travel date you struggled to get on a flight of your choice. It is a crying shame this Airport has arrived at a situation where it is clearly a huge asset to the Tees area and is much needed,

FirTreeFC says...
9:21am Sat 28 Jan 12

Living mid point between Newcastle/Durham Tees Valley airports, it is a simple choice, Newcastle everytime. KLM more flights, better prices, pleasant lounge to sit in, clean toilets and you don't get soaked walking to the plane. Passenger duty tax a rip off and when KLM do pull the plug, the airport is finished!Working in shipping I saw Peel holdings destroy the ports they handle, so no surprise the shambolic management did the same to this airport.

GeordieB says...
9:53am Sat 28 Jan 12

Oo councillors issue a statement. That'll have them on the run! NOT!

Old Bogeyes says...
9:56am Sat 28 Jan 12

lol,,,,,the way i see this is,,,peel are treating the council just the same way as the council treat the public,,who PAY THEIR WAGES. doing everything underhand !!!. Nice one peel,,keep up the good work !!....im loving this i am ;-)

oxbridge says...
10:43am Sat 28 Jan 12

Crime Scene!!

Who gains from clousure are they involved with Peel all along.

Old Bogeyes says...
11:25am Sat 28 Jan 12

oxbridge wrote:
Crime Scene!! Who gains from clousure are they involved with Peel all along.
shhhhh. oh by the way "clousure",,,,are you a brummy ? ;-)

MSG says...
12:19pm Sat 28 Jan 12

I have no problem with th airport closing so long as the funds are spent widening the Gteshead Western bypass so those of us in south Durham can get to Newcastle Airport quicker.
The Airport could become a business park or railfreight depot.

Old Bogeyes says...
12:31pm Sat 28 Jan 12

MSG wrote:
I have no problem with th airport closing so long as the funds are spent widening the Gteshead Western bypass so those of us in south Durham can get to Newcastle Airport quicker. The Airport could become a business park or railfreight depot.
Aint nothing wrong with the western bypass !!!,,,you need to leave home earlier if you are having problems getting there !!,,i find it no bother at all. As for the joke of a place becoming rail freight,,,well,thats a joke too,,the train only stops there about once a month i think.....lol.

Old Bogeyes says...
2:07pm Sat 28 Jan 12

PEEL 4 - 0 COUNCIL,,,you have to laugh,,,,,just like the score from DFC...lol.

Jolly Roger says...
10:54pm Sat 28 Jan 12

Well it serves the councils right for selling the biggest stake to Peel in the first place without safe guards built into the agreement.

So don't cry over spilt milk councillors / Councils as it is your fault in the first place.

ian16th says...
12:40pm Sun 29 Jan 12

Maybe the RAF would like it back, to fly their maritime reconnaissance aircraft over the North Sea.

Oh, I forgot they don’t do that sort of thing these days.

Guy Fawkes says...
4:50pm Sun 29 Jan 12

I am a regular MME user who, since 2003, have been taking long haul trips from there once every 3-4 weeks or so. Although I live quite a way from the airport (in York), it's my favourite of the region's airports due to the ease of road access, plentiful and relatively cheap parking, and almost complete absence of queues.

My impression is that the airport's current problems are essentially down to three issues. No. 1 - the government's attempt to reduce and discourage short-haul leisure flying through punitive taxation; no. 2 - the general economic situation (in particular, the region has a disporportionately high number of public sector workers, who have suffered real-terms salary reductions since around 2008); and no. 3 - competitor airports in the same catchment area that offer a better range of flights and facilities.

But there is no doubt that MME is in serious trouble. In the last week I went out on a KL1534 to AMS and returned on a KL1537 a few days later. Both flights had less than a third full (I counted 22 on the return trip).

I get the impression that during the boom years, the boost in passenger numbers was almost exclusively accounted for by short-haul leisure flights: it was FlyBe and Ryanair that were packing the terminal, not KLM and Eastern. They've gone, because people aren't flying on day trips and mini-breaks any more. That's not surprising, when the taxes and fees on a short-haul flight are now £60-70 per person alone. We have the highest air passenger duty in the developed world, and unless the government tells the environazis where to go and reduces it, I'm afraid that MME as a passenger airport will probably go the same way as Plymouth last year - bust.

The other issue is that anyone who lives within easy driving distance of MME probably also lives within easy driving distance of NCL or LBA. They offer more flights, better terminal facilities and no £6 departure fee. Personally, I regard an airport as somewhere to get on a plane and don't care about shops and restaurants. I fly so frequently that I just want to get through airports as quickly as possible, hence my preference for MME and not minding the £6 fee (which, in the context of a business class transatlantic ticket, is nothing). But holidaymakers on a budget do regard airports more of a shopping experience, and will be put off by £24 or £30 that they don't have to pay somewhere else. And at MME, they now only have one, full price airline (albeit a very good one) to fly with.

I'll be very sad if MME closes and I have to start using HUY or LBA instead, but essentially I suspect that the decision is out of local hands. There are never going to be enough business travellers to sustain the airport alone, and so aviation taxes have to be reduced to allow leisure travellers to start flying again.

Allanopie says...
8:18am Mon 30 Jan 12

The local,s @ OAK TREE will be delighted ! What next , Darlo FC move the Arena there !

Local Businesses

Most popular