Send us your pictures, video, news and views by texting NORTHERN ECHO to 80360 or email us
11:00am Thursday 2nd December 2010 in News
By Joe Willis, Regional chief reporter
University lecturer Christine Gill speaks to Joe Willis about her battle to reclaim the £2m family farm left to the RSPCA by her mother.
LIKE many people across Britain, Christine Gill spent Tuesday evening battling through the snow to get home.
For her, though, the journey had extra significance. Earlier that day, the country’s most senior civil judge had ruled that she could keep the 287-acre family farm at Potto, near Northallerton, which she had worked on since she was a girl.
The Court of Appeal upheld an earlier High Court decision which ruled that the will signed by her mother, Joyce, leaving the farm and £300,000 to the RSPCA was invalid.
The judgement brought to an end a bitter four-year struggle with the charity.
It began in 2006 when her mother died. When Dr Gill spoke to her mother’s solicitor, she was told that the charity was the main beneficiary – despite her parents’ repeated assurances during their lives that she would get the farm.
The court heard how Dr Gill’s mother suffered from agoraphobia and was “coerced”
into signing the will by her “domineering” husband, John.
The reasons why Mr Gill signed everything to the charity, which he openly disliked, will never be known.
Speaking to The Northern Echo yesterday, Dr Gill, 60, who lectures at the University of Leeds, said the courts had realised it was not her mother’s wish to leave the farm to the charity.
“My mother loved me and I loved her,” she said.
“There’s no way she would have wanted this to happen.
She would have been appalled if she knew what we had been through the past four years.
“She wanted myself and (my son) Christopher to carry on with the farm.”
Dr Gill said she could not understand the RSPCA’s decision to continue fighting in court.
She said: “I have no axe to grind with the RSPCA. There’s a shelter at Great Ayton that does a great job, but that’s a million miles away from the executives who pushed this through the courts.”
The lecturer said she had repeatedly tried to settle out of court.
“I was pleading with them but it fell on deaf ears. Nobody wanted to hear.”
Despite the criticism of the charity, Dr Gill remains philosophical about the legal battle and now just wants to get on with running the farm.
“I guess it’s a case of all’s well that ends well,” she said.
And although there may still be a battle over costs to be fought, it appears it is the end of the argument.
In a statement issued yesterday, the charity said: “Although we are disappointed with this outcome, it strengthens our resolve to continue our important work preventing cruelty and suffering to animals.”
Comments(15)
perrow
says...
5:29pm Thu 2 Dec 10
kristal27
says...
6:21pm Thu 2 Dec 10
perrow wrote:so perrow - if your mum or dad left their house to you in their will and your older sister contested the will because she said your parents always said she would get it ,and your sister won the case -would that be justice?
thank god for justice
lovemydog
says...
7:43pm Thu 2 Dec 10
animalsrbetterthanpeople
says...
4:53pm Fri 3 Dec 10
queenie1
says...
9:50am Sat 4 Dec 10
potnoodle
says...
10:14am Sat 4 Dec 10
kristal27
says...
11:18am Sat 4 Dec 10
Joseph Piccioni
says...
12:28pm Sat 4 Dec 10
stevegg
says...
4:02pm Sat 4 Dec 10
queenie1
says...
7:12pm Sat 4 Dec 10
Safewings
says...
9:49am Sun 5 Dec 10
potnoodle
says...
10:10am Sun 5 Dec 10
Safewings wrote:What total and utter rubbish.
Queenie1, You are spot on and obviously someone with a sound animal welfare background. I say this because the majority of animal welfare orientated people know only too well what the rspca has sadly become. They have turned their back on animal welfare and chosen the path of becoming a politically charged money motivated business that uses innocent peoples` donations for purposes far removed than what the rspca was once founded on, namely caring for animals. They take in at head office in excess of £110m a year yet their satelite animal rescues with the rspca logo struggle to the point of closing down or making staff redundant. How can this be seen as animal friendly ?. The rspca have become too powerful and accountable to no one and the World has witnessed what happens when fanatical dictators take control !. Time for change and time for the Government to do their job instead of letting the charity sector run and pick up the bill........
kristal27
says...
2:12pm Sun 5 Dec 10
potnoodle
says...
11:26am Mon 6 Dec 10
kristal27 wrote:The will was very clear. Nothing to the daughter but everything to the RSPCA.
this is not a slagging match on the merits of the RSPCA - I have had personal experience in dealing with the m and they are less than useless -its irrelevant WHO the money was left to - the point is a will was contested and won on what looks like very dodgy grounds and has set a precedent. if the money had been left to the air ambulance or a childrens charity, would anyone who supports Dr. Gill change their minds?
Search for jobs in Darlington, Durham, Middlesbrough...
Search Now »
Search dating in Darlington, Durham, Middlesbrough...
Search Now »
Search for houses in Darlington, Durham...
Search Now »
Search for cars in Darlington, Durham, Newcastle and more
Search Now »
kristal27 says...
12:53pm Thu 2 Dec 10