News RSS Feed Send your news, pictures & videos


Ian Huntley to sue Prison Service after he was attacked in Frankland jail


SOHAM murderer Ian Huntley is to sue the Prison Service after he was attacked by an inmate in a County Durham jail.

Huntley's throat was slashed at Frankland Prison in March.

The 36-year-old, who murdered the 10-year-old schoolgirls Holly Wells and Jessica Chapman in 2002, is claiming the service has failed in its duty of care towards him.

He is understood to be claiming almost £100,000 in damages and the case could cost the taxpayer more than £1m in legal aid fees.

A Ministry of Justice spokesman said last night the compensation claim would be "vigorously defended".

Huntley was moved to Frankland, a Category A high security men's prison, in 2008.

While at Frankland he was attacked and slashed across the throat by a prisoner with a razor blade.

A Ministry of Justice spokesman said: "Ian Huntley is bringing a claim against the Ministry of Justice following an assault by another prisoner."

Comments(35)

Copley23 says...
8:44am Sat 31 Jul 10

Oh dear. What a shame. Never mind. Guess he has a very short memory.....and an even smaller sense of shame.

big arnie says...
12:05pm Sat 31 Jul 10

Can I bring a claim against the fella who attacked him for not finishing the job?

cj-dog says...
1:57pm Sat 31 Jul 10

If there was ever a reason for the return of the death penalty then this piece of vermin is it.
He and his kind should be part of the national austerity cuts.

Andrew of Darlington says...
3:13pm Sat 31 Jul 10

When in prison the prison service should protect inmates and they let Huntley down. I know he has done wrong but if the prison service had done their job properly he would not have been attacked.

stevegg says...
4:04pm Sat 31 Jul 10

He showed absolutely no duty of care towards the 2 innocent victims he murdered so why should he get a penny. If he gets paid anything it will prove that the rights of criminals are above the rights of victims and what a shmbles our legal system is. You live by the sword, you die by the sword!

solar thermal kid says...
4:06pm Sat 31 Jul 10

Andrew of Darlington wrote:
When in prison the prison service should protect inmates and they let Huntley down. I know he has done wrong but if the prison service had done their job properly he would not have been attacked.
What a lame comment...Go and do some good elsewhere...he is scum and deserves every attack at every opportunity. I would like to attack him as would every other parent in the land. Prison officers should be allowed to turn a blind eye when in the presence of vermin like Huntley.

Copley23 says...
4:43pm Sat 31 Jul 10

big arnie wrote:
Can I bring a claim against the fella who attacked him for not finishing the job?
Lovin' this Arnie!! :).....the phantom toothbrush whittler has let us down, let's sue him for.....erm....how about £100,000........

Jolly Roger says...
5:17pm Sat 31 Jul 10

Why should any prisoner be allowed to sue andone, if he wins money, it should go ito his victims families for the upset he caused them.

But I agree that hanging should be brought back for murder of children and people who serve us in the line of duty.

Life for a life or life in prison no get out clause. Even more so no TV etc etc.

smokin says...
5:41pm Sat 31 Jul 10

what right has he to sue he took those two little girls rights away and their future and what did he get?
" a life of luxury "
it's common sense gone mad
when you go to prison for this kind of crime you should have NO rights what so ever

Andrew of Darlington says...
6:04pm Sat 31 Jul 10

Huntley has done wrong and is being punished under the the British justice system. Saying prison officers should turn a blind eye brings that person down to the same level as Huntley in my book.

Dean M says...
8:32pm Sat 31 Jul 10

He's not really being punished though, is he? He's just had his liberty taken away, that's all. It's a sentence that was given, but not much in the way of punishment.
.
Particularly given the seriousness of the offence he committed.
.
If lawyers have any input, we will always have these daft compensation claim entitlements, because lots of legal aid money will pay lots of lawyers wages. Lets hope the Tories slap the legal profession down and put an end to this nonsense. I'd prefer my taxes were spent on schools and hospitals rather than child murderers. Just a personal view.

mb500 says...
9:04pm Sat 31 Jul 10

I'm a lawyer and feel utter repulsion at the audacity of Huntley in seeking compensation - if he had not murdered two innocent children he would not have been locked up with those intent on cutting his throat! Common sense must prevail

jayster says...
10:11pm Sat 31 Jul 10

Ian Huntley is to sue the Prison Service as he had his throat cut by a fellow inmate. The fees for his lawyer are being paid through the legal aid scheme, could amount to hundreds of thousands of pounds. He murdered two children.... Wouldn't it be cheaper to have a whip round to buy the other cons sharper knives

solar thermal kid says...
12:15am Sun 1 Aug 10

Andrew of Darlington wrote:
Huntley has done wrong and is being punished under the the British justice system. Saying prison officers should turn a blind eye brings that person down to the same level as Huntley in my book.
Andrew of Darlington...you are the exact reason these tossers try to get compensation...tryin
g to give them rights because they are being given justice under the UK system. The SYSTEM is wrong...shoot them now...

if you believe justice is being done...let him out now...move in next door to you and your children...see if he's learnt his lesson...YOU ARE A DISGRACE TO BRITISH SOCIETY....you need putting in a cell with these scum...see how much respect they give you...you bloody moron.

westminister says...
12:24am Sun 1 Aug 10

"Andrew from Darlington" It's people just like you that has given the bill of rights to scum like "Huntley". No he has no rights he took those rights away when he murdered those two innocent children, he should be horse whipped and put to death and WE should have the rights to stop paying tax for the scum to stay alive in prison, he's living a life of riley in there, good riddance to him when he dies and I hope he burns in hell!

Oldharleyman says...
12:09pm Sun 1 Aug 10

Andrew of Darlington wrote:
Huntley has done wrong and is being punished under the the British justice system. Saying prison officers should turn a blind eye brings that person down to the same level as Huntley in my book.
I totally agree, but the rights of any Prisoner to sue under any circumstance MUST BE STOPPED!!!This is rapidly turning into "who hates Huntley the most and proves it by describing what should happen to him" thread and I wont stoop to that level. Huntley is a sick evil individual who is going to be in Prison for the rest of his life...end of, I would prefer it if Media stories about him would stop altogether as they feed his sick mind.

Super steve says...
1:19pm Sun 1 Aug 10

Lets us be fair and civilised about this, He should be given exactly the same kindness, care and consideration he gave Holly and Jessica, Period.

Super steve says...
1:23pm Sun 1 Aug 10

I wish I could horse whip the thug who slashed Mr Huntleys throat for his vicious attack, and I would keep thrashing him until he did the job right.

Super steve says...
1:28pm Sun 1 Aug 10

British justice most cleary defined. the parents of the victimns recieved £12,000 for the brutal murder and loss of their beautiful children.

Mr Huntley gets 3 meals a day, full health and dental care, attendant social workers, educational and liesure facilities free for life, the undying support from the morons of the league of penal reform, and £100,000 compo for a cut to his face.
Isnt it wonderful living in caring socialist Britain ?

Big Dave says...
1:30pm Sun 1 Aug 10

...what, no facebook groups calling him a legend?I can see a gap in the market for some shell suit clad buffoon to start one up, perhaps one for the scrote who didn't quite manage to attack Huntley properly- forgetting that the one doing the attacking is also in prison, and therefore propbably not a very nice person.
Let Huntley sue and award all the compensation to the families he devastated. We decided a long time ago to be 'civillized' and abolish capital punishment....its been downhill ever since. I'd personally do away with most prisoners- a bullet's far cheaper than housing and feeding the cretins so I don't see the point in getting het up about any single prisoner

Dean M says...
12:21am Mon 2 Aug 10

A totally different case to Raoul Moat, Big Dave, and I would probably join a facebook group that supports the con for cutting Huntley's throat.
.
Other than that, I agree with what you say.

Big Dave says...
7:49am Mon 2 Aug 10

...how so? They're both homicidal maniacs. I suppose at least Moat saved the taxpayer the burden of paying for his upkeep (grudgingly). I can't get too excited about the guy who attacked Huntley though- he's an armed robber, so like I said, not a very nice chap. Bad things happen in prisons- the appeal should be luaghed out of the dock...but it won't.

Dean M says...
6:33pm Mon 2 Aug 10

Well I wouldn't, and I suspect most people wouldn't, put Raoul Moat in anywhere near the same boat as Ian Huntley. The murder of former wives/partners by jealous husbands acting out of rage is still murder, and obviously unacceptable, but is not as heinous as the cold-blooded murder of children. In my view.

Big Dave says...
8:30am Tue 3 Aug 10

...acting out of rage? With all that planning and preparation along with the "If I can't have you, no one can" attitude and the attempted murder of police officers I don't see there's much difference between the two. A murderer is a murderer in my eyes...but bearing in mind Richard Ramirez used to get fan mail and wedding proposals from deluded "fans" it all goes to show there are some seriously mentally unstable folk out there

lovedurham says...
11:03am Tue 3 Aug 10

Big Dave, Totally agree with your comments. For Dean M. to categorise acceptable murders and not acceptable murders seems bizarre. Perhaps hes a friend of the Raoul Moat Facebook page? Both deserved what they got.

Dean M says...
5:25pm Tue 3 Aug 10

lovedurham wrote:
"For Dean M. to categorise acceptable murders and not acceptable murders seems bizarre"
.
It would be more than bizarre, it would be totally wrong. But then again, I did not do or say this. Another one that can't read. Perhaps you'd care to review my posts and tell me I'm wrong, or even quote me? When you can't ('cos you can't) perhaps you'll be man or woman enough to apologise?

Big Dave says...
10:40pm Tue 3 Aug 10

...you didn't say that Dean but I know what lovedurham means- the inference from your comments is that certain murders are worse than others. For me, Moat was far more dangerous than Huntly, although I'll grant that Huntleys particular crime is stomach churning. I wouldn't say there was any difference though- both knew what they were they were doing and killed regardless.

Oldharleyman says...
10:40pm Tue 3 Aug 10

Dean M wrote:
lovedurham wrote: "For Dean M. to categorise acceptable murders and not acceptable murders seems bizarre" . It would be more than bizarre, it would be totally wrong. But then again, I did not do or say this. Another one that can't read. Perhaps you'd care to review my posts and tell me I'm wrong, or even quote me? When you can't ('cos you can't) perhaps you'll be man or woman enough to apologise?
Oh dear, someone else has the audacity to criticise you and you resort to insults DM now who were you having a go at for exactly this?? hhmm Pot Kettle etc etc

Dean M says...
11:33pm Tue 3 Aug 10

What insults would they be then, Burnsy? You never could read, and you still can't.
.
Quite happy to be criticised by the way, but misquoting someone is a bit naughty.

Dean M says...
11:43pm Tue 3 Aug 10

Big Dave, Moat was far more dangerous then Huntley? Seriously? Moat was on the run for a week after shooting the copper and he didn't hurt anyone else. He had a grudge against particular people who he believed had harmed him or done him wrong - in his mind, it was revenge.
.
This doesn't make it acceptable but I don't put it in the same league as the abduction, rape, murder and burning of the bodies of innocent, small children. If you do then fair enough, we'll disagree.

Oldharleyman says...
7:54am Wed 4 Aug 10

Dean M wrote:
What insults would they be then, Burnsy? You never could read, and you still can't. . Quite happy to be criticised by the way, but misquoting someone is a bit naughty.
"another one that cant read" so thats praising him DEANM? Jeeeez selective memory or what!lol

Big Dave says...
9:35am Wed 4 Aug 10

Dean M wrote:
Big Dave, Moat was far more dangerous then Huntley? Seriously? Moat was on the run for a week after shooting the copper and he didn't hurt anyone else. He had a grudge against particular people who he believed had harmed him or done him wrong - in his mind, it was revenge. . This doesn't make it acceptable but I don't put it in the same league as the abduction, rape, murder and burning of the bodies of innocent, small children. If you do then fair enough, we'll disagree.
....Moat had an extensive history of violence, particularly towards women, was insanely jealous and manipulative with a criminal network of friends and associates willing to help him no matter what. He was serving a prison sentence for assaulting his own daughter I believe and when his partner found the courage to try and leave him, he decides to try and execute her, her new partner (although lets be honest Dean, if any bloke happened to be stood talking to her they'd have been killed), oh and any police officer. So to that end, he sneaks up on a parked patrol and shots a cop without warning in the face. Then goes on the run and starts threatening to harm the public because he doesn't like the fact the media have portrayed him as a bully. And you think Huntley was more dangerous? His crime is, as I said, stomach churning but they're in the same category to my mind.

Dean M says...
9:27pm Wed 4 Aug 10

Oldharleyman wrote:
Dean M wrote:
What insults would they be then, Burnsy? You never could read, and you still can't. . Quite happy to be criticised by the way, but misquoting someone is a bit naughty.
"another one that cant read" so thats praising him DEANM? Jeeeez selective memory or what!lol
There's a difference between criticising someone for misquoting or misrepresenting you, due to their lack of ability to read correctly, and your tactic of resorting to abuse at the earliest opportunity. You obviously don't know the difference.
.
Big Dave - we'll disagree then. I suspect some of the 'facts' about Moat's history have been spun; not surprisingly his brother paints a different picture of him. No 40,000 plus facebook group for Huntley. And these don't include people like me, who just think that the view that Moat was nothing but a cold-hearted monster is too simplistic.

Big Dave says...
6:48am Thu 5 Aug 10

...all the 40,000 facebook 'fans' shows me is that there are some seriously unhinged people out there. Their comments, interestingly enough, mainly fell into two camps-those who think women are property, to be owned and controlled by men, and those with an axe to grind about police. Huntley will still receive 'fan' mail whilst in prison as most notorious killers do. Scum is scum, whichever way you spin it

Dean M says...
6:26pm Thu 5 Aug 10

'seriously unhinged people out there' - I agree with you.
.
But these 40,000 were those who went so far as to join the facebook group. How many more, like me, did not go this far but just feel that simply condemning Moat as a cold-hearted monster is not the full story?
.
Time for me to back out of this one I think. We seem to generally agree that we are too soft on most killers in our society, even if we disagree on this particular case.


ATTACKED: Soham murderer Ian Huntley LEGAL BID: Ian Huntley

Most popular


Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »

Local Businesses