News RSS Feed Send your news, pictures & videos


Government figures wrong, says wind farm developer


DEVELOPERS who want to build a wind farm near a Teesdale beauty spot have questioned Government figures which suggest that nearby turbines only operate at onequarter of their efficiency.

Banks Developments wants to create a six-turbine energygeneration site on land close to Hamsterley Forest, near Bishop Auckland.

On Monday evening, Stewart Proban and Martyn Earle, from the company, spent more than an hour discussing plans with Hamsterley Parish Council and about 25 members of the public.

One of the questions put to Mr Proban and Mr Earle by parish councillor Jonathan Peacock related to Ofgem figures which showed that the wind farm at nearby Tow Law, which was also created by Banks, operated at just 27.1 per cent efficiency during 2009.

Mr Proban rejected the statistics, saying: “I can assure you that those figures are wrong. I’m not in a position to divulge the actual figures, but they aren’t correct.”

Coun Peacock responded by by asking: “So are you saying that the figures provided by the Government aren’t right?”

“Yes I am,” replied Mr Proban.

The figures were taken from an Ofgem site which logs how much subsidies, in the form of Renewable Obligation Certificates, wind farms claim from the Government.

Last night, a spokesman for Banks said that the company was unable to provide the figures they think are correct as it is commercially sensitive information and the company no longer owns the Tow Law site.

Coun Peacock welcomed the visit from the two Banks representatives, saying: “We are very glad they came and we thank them for coming. We believe that the parish council and members of the public should be kept informed.”

In April, local people were upset after members of Banks and Woodland Parish Council held a meeting without public knowledge.

A presentation from the Banks representatives on Monday revealed that the company was working on a model of six 110m-high turbines at the Windy Bank site and the company hoped to submit a planning application to Durham County Council in the autumn.

Mr Proban said that, because of the Special Protection Area for birds near Windy Bank, the group was undertaking extensive landscape and ecological surveys in and around the area.

Comments(3)

Whaup says...
12:34pm Wed 14 Jul 10

So, let me get this right, Banks are saying that they did not supply the correct figures to Ofgem and underclaimed on the Renewables Obligation subsidy?

And pigs might fly!

FenBeagle says...
10:55pm Wed 14 Jul 10

'I can assure you those figures are wrong'
how CAN he assure us?

... 'I'm not in a position to divulge the actual figures.'

.....'The Company was unable to provide the figures'

as-sure...... 'to remove doubt'

mtwtaylor@btconnect.com says...
11:43pm Wed 14 Jul 10

27% performance is very high for an inland site.
The average on-shore figure is likely to be no more than 25%
At the given height of 110 metres these turbines are likely to be two megawatt IE 2000 kilowatts.
At a performance of 25% the nett performance is obviously 500 KW
Here you have the main reason for secrecy. A home at suppertime uses at least 6KW.
6 into 500 is 84 homes only
Claims are for 1000 homes per turbine
So at peak times the other 900 are back on good old fashioned smutty coal energy.
Yes, they are not in a position to divulge but to work out the 25% only requires local wind records over two years and some simple maths. Wind energy is the greatest confidence trick of the decade only to be surpassed by the covert way they get you to pay for the entire pantomime.


Most popular


Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »

Local Businesses