News RSS Feed Send your news, pictures & videos


Cameron says state spending must be cut in North-East

Cameron says North-East in front line for public spending cuts Cameron says North-East in front line for public spending cuts

DAVID Cameron last night put the North-East in the firing line for swingeing public spending cuts if the Conservatives win the General Election.

In an interview with the BBC's Jeremy Paxman, the Tory leader picked out the North-East as the region of England where state spending was too high and must be reduced.

Mr Cameron also refused - three times - to rule out a VAT hike in his first 'emergency' budget, which is likely to be unveiled in just six weeks' time.

He acknowledged that the Thatcher governments had been prepared to "tolerate" an historic leap in poverty, insisting there had been no alternative faced with a "busted economy".

And he declined to rule out a Cabinet place for Liberal Democrat leader Nick Clegg, while attacking the record of treasury spokesman Vince Cable, saying: "He has made a bit of a mess of it."

In the most revealing part of the interview, Mr Cameron - who has been repeatedly accused of keeping the details of his spending cuts under wraps - described the level of public spending in the North-East as "unsustainable".

Asked where the axe would fall, he first mentioned Northern Ireland, but went on: "There are other parts of the country, including the North-East, where many people would accept that the aim has got to be to get the private sector, to get the commercial sector going."

Told that people in the North-East would be "concerned", Mr Cameron insisted cuts were inevitable whoever won the election, adding: "I don't think you can make this into some ideological crusade."

Asked if he, and Shadow Chancellor George Osborne, were "immensely privileged young men with a glint in their eye", he replied: "I don't accept that. I didn't come into politics to make these sort of reductions that we are going to have to do."

And he insisted his priority would be to avoid job losses, saying: "If you don't fill posts that become available, particularly in the back offices, you can actually save serious money there, without people losing their jobs."

The interview came on the day that Gordon Brown claimed Conservative policies would have put 1.7m more people out of work during the recession, adding: "Our hard-earned recovery is too fragile to let these novices play with it now."

On VAT, Mr Cameron said the Tories had "absolutely no plans" to raise the tax, insisting the emphasis of his 'emergency' budget would be on spending cuts.

But Mr Paxman said: "That's not the same as a guarantee. I'm only asking you about your first budget, which could be in only six weeks?" Mr Cameron gave the same reply.

Asked if the Thatcher governments had done enough to stem the surge in inequality in the 1980s, he replied: "No. But this is now a new Conservative party."

Mr Cameron also described last year's VAT cut as a "very big mistake" and denied his plan for a £3-a-week marriage tax break was intended to discourage working mothers, adding: "I'm not giving a lecture to anyone."

The Conservative leader defended his plans to scrap inheritance tax for everyone except millionaires on the grounds that the tax should not hit people on "relatively modest earnings".

And he warned a Lib-Lab pact in a hung parliament would lead to more illegal immigration - because of Lib Dem plans for a partial amnesty - and to more dangerous prisoners being released onto the streets.

Mr Cameron declined twice to rule out a Cabinet place for Mr Clegg, while insisting a Conservative majority on May 6 was still "achievable".

Speaking afterwards, Lord Michael Bates of Langbaurghm deputy chairman of the Conservative Party, denied that Mr Cameron had lined the region up for large public sector cuts.

he said: "What David said was the North-East economy was in a position of imbalance and we need to get that back in balance by growing the public sector, not by cutting the public sector."

Comments(18)

Dante says...
10:49am Sat 24 Apr 10

And people wonder why the Tories are hated in the Northeast. Labour hasn't don'e much either, but the Tories seem to take a delight in creating unemployment in this region.

Perhaps they see it as a way of getting even because of the area not returning many Tory MPs

So if anyone needed confirmation that they are still the NASTY party, Cameron has confirmed it.

Super steve says...
11:14am Sat 24 Apr 10

Hey the North East has no one to blaim but its own people and labour.
This region has never supported anything but labour and is now impoverished and deprived thanks to Labour.
I dont blaim the tories at all for understanding that public spending must be cut.
Its not the Tories who are the nasty party its Labour who allow Scotland which is a much richer place than the NE to get 20% more per person from the state funds than the NE and refuse to deal with it.

Of course no cuts of any size would be needed if we got out of the EU which costs us £12Billion PA after rebates. So if the NE is serious about protecting its people and not the labour lackies then vote UKIP.

Super steve says...
1:47pm Sat 24 Apr 10

I forgot to mention that Dante appears to have omitted the fact that LABOUR has been in charge for the last 12 years and the numbers out of work have risen in this region.

st-george1 says...
3:00pm Sat 24 Apr 10

The North East is a fools paradise, when it comes to voting Labour and discriminating against anyone or anything that is not Labour affiliated. With only a handfull of pits or shipyards today, non of which have been reinstated by Labour over the past 13 years, many of their workers prejudiced families and others still wont accept that unemployement and life generally in the NE is worse today under nuLabour than it was under any other political party.
For 60 years or more life in the NE has deteriorated, high death rate, more drunks, the fattest, unhealthiest people - men, women and children, the highest unemployment, more people who wont work claiming on some kind of benefit and lots of immigrants allegedly taking british jobs of any kind, all of this and still people will vote for Labour for more of the same.
PS. A vote for Lib-Dems I believe is a wasted and dangerous vote for Labour and even more of the same.

Dante says...
3:59pm Sat 24 Apr 10

You both fail to realise that 2 worngs don't make a right.
no matter what Labour has failed to do, doesn't alter the fact that the Tories are still the nasty party and they prove it yet again, by stating that the biggest cuts will come in the two areas that can least afford them.

Now I would have been impressed with them if Cameron had stated that the biggest cuts would be introduced in Surrey. Of course, he knows that he won't loose any votes by cutting services up here.

So don't try to excuse what the Tories are going to by highlighting Labour's failures in the area, as stated, 2 wrongs don't make a right

Jolly Roger says...
5:44pm Sat 24 Apr 10

The more I reaad the less i want anyone to be PM for our area.

Labour takes us for granted,

Tories bleed us dry,

Lib Dems, are also rans.

So to use my vote one of the minor parties gets my vote ,so I can at least say I voted and you are not doing wht I wanted.

And as for a secret ballot well no way as your no. is on your ballot paper so anyone who knows that can see how you voted. I don't know why we cannot have a completely secret ballot paper so no one knows how anyone has voted.

Super steve says...
8:00pm Sat 24 Apr 10

Dante wrote:
You both fail to realise that 2 worngs don't make a right. no matter what Labour has failed to do, doesn't alter the fact that the Tories are still the nasty party and they prove it yet again, by stating that the biggest cuts will come in the two areas that can least afford them. Now I would have been impressed with them if Cameron had stated that the biggest cuts would be introduced in Surrey. Of course, he knows that he won't loose any votes by cutting services up here. So don't try to excuse what the Tories are going to by highlighting Labour's failures in the area, as stated, 2 wrongs don't make a right
But Dante my good debating chum as you well know Tories dont miss a cxhance to make a profit, so if they thought there was a chance of opening the colleries again they probably would. Course two wrongs dont make a right but Labour has had twelve plus years to recind or cancel Tories decisions, but they have not, indeed they have done just as much damage as the tories.

seanscott says...
9:23pm Sat 24 Apr 10

Cameron was completely taken out of context. I saw the interview and he was talking how all the focus was big govt and not enough focus was on getting the private sector moving.

Conservatives told the northern echo that he wasn't referring to cuts in the northeast yet they still ran with a smear story and from reading the comments it already cost them a vote. The journalists will do anything to keep labour in power.

In the past Cameron has said thatcher's cuts were of the party of the past.

It has been 25 years this is a whole new tory party. Hasn't it come time to stop blaming the party because of thatcher. They have been out of power for 13 years now.

Cameron has said he won't target hard hit areas like northeasat for cuts. He was talking about the lack of people working like teeside situation. He wasn't talking about cuts

Cameron also doesn't need the support in surrey they won by 30 percent in 2005.

Cameron is targeting marginals in the northeast they need to win because they won't be winning the marginals in the southwest with lib dems surge.

Cameron has also said cuts will take place at whitehall.

spragger says...
10:32pm Sat 24 Apr 10

He was right that the NE is too reliant on the state
We have thousands on benefits with their little jobs in the black and grey economy
We have state jobs taking people & resources away from the private sector.
No one ever taxed themselves to growth

Jolly Roger says...
10:55pm Sat 24 Apr 10

Yes but why are so many of the North East people on benefits, you all miss the reason why, it is becuse of all the heavy industries in years gone by, in which we breathed in all sorts of things which has contributed to our ill health.

So yes we might claim more than other areas but in the past we put more into the ecomony than any other area.

lovedurham says...
8:53am Sun 25 Apr 10

............and thats the end of the party political broadcast on behalf of the labour party, (the usual poorly reported, out of context quotes by rob merrick).

lovedurham says...
8:54am Sun 25 Apr 10

............and thats the end of the party political broadcast on behalf of the labour party, (the usual poorly reported, out of context quotes by rob merrick).

spragger says...
12:53pm Sun 25 Apr 10

The lack of enterprise in the NE is shocking. Any young person with an ounce of enterprise seems to move away.
You can see from above its like living in a victim culture. You can see it on the streets, you taxpayers owe me one.
The ill health is primarily due to a poor life style, of fags, drink, poor diet and too little exercise
What ever you do, dont vote for more of the same

Dante says...
1:12pm Sun 25 Apr 10

Stev, the fact that Labour has done nothing to counter the problems caused by the Tories, is the biggest complaint I hear from old Labour supporters.

gramps427 says...
1:52pm Sun 25 Apr 10

Standered blinkered reporting from Mr Merrick, but its not completely wrong. Labour has tried to fill up the void in Job creation in this region by moving as many government jobs here that they could; indeed there would have been more had the civil servants in London been prepared to move, after all cheaper rents on buildings with plenty of empty offices available, just look around Darlington.
That of course creates a problem when trying to cut back on waste and Cameron recognised that by clearly stating that he needed the slack to be taken up by commercial jobs. Now if only Paxman, or Merrick even had challenged Cameron or Brown or Clegg to provide the investment we need to bring commercial enterprise back to the North East. Now that would be real Journalism and not just the cheapskate party political bandiage we are used to.

Dean M says...
6:19pm Sun 25 Apr 10

Dante wrote:
And people wonder why the Tories are hated in the Northeast. Labour hasn't don'e much either, but the Tories seem to take a delight in creating unemployment in this region. Perhaps they see it as a way of getting even because of the area not returning many Tory MPs So if anyone needed confirmation that they are still the NASTY party, Cameron has confirmed it.
Another anti-Tory rant from 'apolitical' Dante. The suggestion that the Tories 'seem to take a delight in creating unemployment' is a rather childish slur. I wouldn't accuse any party of this, even Labour, in such terms - we are talking of a difference in political approach to tackle the problems that we face, as a whole nation.
.
The Tories are planning it to get even 'cos we don't return many Tory MPs? They are a NASTY party? Oh dear, oh dear. Perhaps it's not fair. Perhaps you could go and tell.
.
I agree with seanscott. Cameron is right to say the focus should be on reducing govt, reducing taxes and on getting the private sector moving again.

Dante says...
6:42pm Sun 25 Apr 10

I'm not anit Tory, I'm anti politiacal party who cannot treat all people as equals, and governe to the betterment of all, and the Tories will never do that.
Labour has failed to do it and so will the Libdems..........I doubt too that any of the minor parties will either.
I'm not a religious either, though I do know some scripture, I have fought all over the world, in campaigns most of you will never of heard about, and most of which, I consider illegal, not in the sense that anti war folks call these last two compaigns illegal, but really illegal by anyone's criterian, but sanctioned by this country's government.
So I draw you attention to this.....Taken from the New Living Translation Bible, something I found once.........Ecc 8 v 9 onwards.
9 I have thought deeply about all that goes on here under the sun, where people have the power to hurt each other. 10 I have seen wicked people buried with honor. Yet they were the very ones who frequented the Temple and are now praised in the same city where they committed their crimes! This, too, is meaningless. 11 When a crime is not punished quickly, people feel it is safe to do wrong. 12 But even though a person sins a hundred times and still lives a long time, I know that those who fear God will be better off. 13 The wicked will not prosper, for they do not fear God. Their days will never grow long like the evening shadows.

So, maybe there will be an accounting by politicians, bankers and every other creep who does his fellow man down, maybe even myself for past crimes in serving my so called political masters.
Who knows?

You see, what right has Cameron to cut the costs that will affect the poorest in society, whilst he and his kind can pay for medical help etc etc.

jayster says...
12:26am Mon 26 Apr 10

How to shoot yourself in the foot in the North East. Way to go David.... 1 down 2 to go

click2find

Most popular


About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree