News RSS Feed Send your news, pictures & videos


Car plate triggered by police camera

Peter Chapman Peter Chapman

KILLER Peter Chapman was brought to justice after his vehicle registration number triggered a police camera.

The number had been put into the automatic number plate recognition system after he had failed to comply with notice requirements as a convicted sex offender.

He was picked up by officers on patrol in the Cleveland area and taken to Middlesbrough police station where he told officers “you can crush the car”.

Had he kept his nerve, the vehicle would have been crushed and valuable evidence lost.

Instead, hours later he asked to speak to a senior officer and told him “there has been a terrible accident”.

Peter Chapman confesses to killing Darlington teenager Ashleigh Hall


Stunned detectives who listened to his story took him to the outskirts of Sedgefield where Chapman pointed to the place where he had left Ashleigh’s body.

When he was formally interviewed, however, he was less than helpful. In the first session he was tearful and crying, but refused to answer questions.

At a second interview he produced a nine-page prepared statement giving his version of events.

When he was questioned about details of the statement, he became aggressive.

Asked where his laptop computer was, he replied: “On the planet Pluto.”

Officers pressed for more information and Chapman’s reaction was simply to put his hands over his ears and drop his head between he knees.

Detective Constable Tim Lerner said: “As the questioning went on he became more aggressive – at one point saying, ‘I’ve had enough of this, I’m going’.

“He was told he was going nowhere.

“It is unusual behaviour, but he was being questioned about something he didn’t want to be questioned about.

“He thought he had covered all the points in his statement and that would be accepted. It wasn’t.”

In the statement, Chapman said he and Ashleigh had met two days earlier, but this was quickly proved to be false.

He claimed that on the Sunday they were in the car “having a laugh” before having consensual sex However, tests showed force was used and the teenager had been bound with tape.

Chapman claimed Ashleigh became angry after he told her he had no money to pay for a hotel.

However, he had £70 on him.

He also claimed he had ended up in a farm lane near Sedgefield where Ashleigh’s body was found after taking a wrong turn, but his sat-nav system showed he had made an earlier reconnaissance of the area.

He also said in his statement he had tried to resuscitate the teenager when he realised she was not breathing.

Chillingly, police are confident no attempts to resuscitate her were made.

Detective Inspector Mick Callan, head of the major crime unit at Durham Police, said: “By using the picture of a good looking young man as a cover, he had woven a web of attraction and deceit that sadly had a murderous ending.”

After sentencing Chapman to life yesterday, Judge Peter Fox praised Durham Police for their investigation.

He said: “The scientific support is commendable. The reconstruction of events has been meticulous and a credit must be given to those who did that.”

Comments(4)

anon100 says...
10:59am Tue 9 Mar 10

http://ts18.gazettel
ive.co.uk/2007/07/co
urt-told-sex-offende
r-revers.html

sounds familiar , about them losing track of sex offenders and them moving around the country unknown.

Dean M says...
9:12pm Tue 9 Mar 10

And in the case of this worthless piece of sh1t, who is guilty beyond any doubt, a 10p bullet through the head would save the taxpayer an awful lot of money.
.
The 'investment' of millions of pounds of our cash in Jon Venables has produced what? Progression from child murderer (fact) to child rapist.....allegedly
.

AllanFraser says...
11:33pm Tue 9 Mar 10

Yes, I believe that sex offenders should be tagged.
I used to be against the death penalty but over the last couple of years I have seriously questioned this. Perhaps there is a case for the reintroduction of the death penalty in certain cases. Surely it would also act as a deterrent?

Big Dave says...
7:58am Wed 10 Mar 10

...it doesn't matter if it acted as a deterrent or not- it would stop them reoffending and make the rest of us safer.I don't often agree with Dean but he's right on the button. All the monitoring in the world can only do so much, unless it's in a secure location (eg prison). Tagging is not the answer as many criminals sentenced to home detention curfews breach them and ignore the tag, if not remove it altogther...which is exactly what sex offenders would do.

click2find

Most popular


About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree