Report this comment
  • "I live in Dalton, enjoy track days, watching motor sport. I have neighbors "pro" and "anti" croft circuit and will selfishly miss having a choice of track days. My gripe however is not about the case but how it has been reported, I can only imagine the circuit and their lawyers have cringed at many of the comments on this and other forums making genuine race fans look like mindless idiots making threats with bad language with little or no knowledge of the facts. If this is the modern day lynch mob's way of dealing with a dispute thank God for judges even if they get it wrong sometimes. But surely this debate should be about the circuit and not a forum to abuse people. The family concerned obviously don’t share our passion for motor sport but they are decent people and many of the comments on face book (the website the papers have promoted with the "save croft" thread) are rude, untrue and threatening and some are all three. Imagine they were written about your Daughter, Mother, Wife, Grandma, Dad Husband or Granddad because they are all of these to someone. Also bare in mind all those who wish to show your support by coming to croft to protest by doing "donuts" on our lawns or driving around the village "blowing your horns" and even "bulldozing" our homes remember many of us probably enjoy and support the circuit more than those have written this stuff. There are two sides to every argument on one side.. When they bought their house in the 1980's the circuit ran a handful of meetings per year and last year it had c.200 days. Is that any different to you buying a house next to a quiet road and 20 years later its becomes a Motorway.. Should you take it on the chin you knew it was a road when you bought it? And on the other side the argument for the circuit is well documented it is one of the friendliest well-organized circuits in the UK and they feel without the non-spectator events they will find it difficult to fund the 13 or so spectator events, which help the local Hotels and B&B, trade. So let’s keep it in perspective (to the best of my knowledge these are the figures) the circuit had c.200 noisy days last year they will be cut to 40 perhaps this is too few and perhaps 200 was too many? This is no doubt the debate, which has been going on, and will no doubt run and run. But please lets stop the swipes at our village and the family involved. It is too easy to jump on the popular bandwagon but before you do please consider how reckless support reflects on our Circuit and how it makes both the pro and anti croft locals feel. "
  • This field is mandatory
  • This field is mandatory
  • Please note we will not accept reports with HTML tags or URLs in them.


  • Enter the above word in the box below

Croft motor racing circuit loses noise appeal

The Northern Echo: Best of British Rallycross at Croft circuit Best of British Rallycross at Croft circuit

A RACING circuit today lost its appeal against a legal case brought by a couple and their daughter who say their lives have been blighted by noise from the track.

Croft Circuit, near Darlington, was also hit with an injunction, restricting "noisy activities" at the track to just 40 days-a-year.

Derek and Julia Watson and their daughter, Jill Wilson, all live within about 300 metres of the circuit, in Dalton-on-Tees, and say their enjoyment of their homes has for years been gravely affected by the "loud, intrusive and repetitive noise".

In an extremely rare decision in April last year, High Court judge, Mr Justice Simon, ruled all three had been victims of "noise nuisance" and ordered the circuit's tenants - Croft Promo-Sport Ltd - to pay Mr and Mrs Watson £109,600 damages, and Mrs Wilson £40,000.

Croft Promo-Sport had its appeal against that order dismissed by judges today.

However the issuing of the injunction will result in a reduction in the residents' damages payouts, which were largely based on the reduction in value of their homes caused by the noise nuisance.

Croft Promo Sport also faces massive legal costs bills. The Watsons and Mrs Wilson were represented by top QC, David Hart, and their legal costs bills alone have been put at around £700,000.

At London's Appeal Court, Croft Promo-Sport had argued that Mr Justice Simon was "plainly wrong" to rule in favour of the Watsons.

Richard Jones QC, for the company, argued that 1963 and 1988 planning permissions granted for the race track - formerly a World War 2 aerodrome and first used for racing in 1949 - had "changed the character" of the area to such an extent that the noise levels were reasonable.

He added that noise and other issues relating to the racetrack had been carefully considered by expert planning inspectors during two public inquiries and a balance struck between the interests of local residents and the public amenity value of the circuit.

The QC said the court decision would have serious implications for the future use of the racetrack and had left Croft Promo-Sport not only exposed to enormous legal costs bills, but also open to other potential claims by an "uncertain number" of other neighbouring landowners.

However, Appeal Court judge, Sir Andrew Morritt, today said he could find no legal flaw in Mr Justice Simon's conclusion that the Watsons and Mrs Wilson had suffered an "actionable nuisance".

Sir Andrew, sitting with Lord Justice Richards and Lady Justice Hallett, also ruled it was "illogical" of Mr Justice Simon to deny the trio an injunction, restricting the number of days to 40 on which "noisy activities" can take place at the racetrack.

Croft Promo-Sport were refused permission to appeal further to the House of Lords and ordered to pay more than £120,000 in legal costs straight away. That will be only a fraction of the total lawyers' bills faced by the company.

The objection by the Watsons and Mrs Wilson was not to car and motorbike racing events, which take place on the track on about 45-50 days-a-year, but to "vehicle testing days" and "track days", when members of the public drive cars around the track all day long at high speed.

Croft Promo-Sport Ltd has a leasehold interest in the circuit, which is managed by Croft Classic and Historic Motor Sports Ltd (CCHM). CCHM was set up in 1994 by Mr Jimmy Wilson - who was married to Jill Wilson between 1987 and 1994 - along with Trevor Chaytor-Norris and his wife Katherine, who is the owner of the Croft Motor Circuit.

Local Businesses

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree