News RSS Feed


Fears for future of racing circuit


THE future of a North-East racing circuit that generates £3m a year for the local economy depends on an Appeal Court decision over noise levels, motorsport chiefs said last night.

Barristers for Croft Circuit, near Darlington, are trying to overturn an order to pay £150,000 to a couple and their daughter, who live next to the track.

The family complained that their quality of life had been ruined by screeching tyres and revving engines.

Race organisers say that if the decision is upheld, it could open the gates to countless compensation claims from neighbouring residents, jeopardising the long-term future of the venue.

No decision has been reached, after a hearing was held at the Court of Appeal, in London, this week.

“We do feel like we have the sword of Damocles hanging over us,” said Dennis Carter, director of Croft-Promo- Sport, which organises the British Superbike Championships and the British Touring Car Championships at Croft. The events attract up to 30,000 people.

“Our future really depends on what the court decides.

“I do not want to sound too alarmist because I would like to think we can still find a way through this.

“The people at Croft do a fantastic job for us and I would really like it to continue.

We will do everything we can to keep it going.

“It was a huge blow when the court decided we should pay damages. It is possible that there could be cuts if we have to pay this money out.

“Once we get the decision we will have to sit down and think very carefully about what to do next.”

Derek and Julia Watson and their daughter, Jill Wilson, live at Vince Moor East, Dalton- on-Tees, within about 300 metres of the circuit.

The family say their enjoyment of their homes has, for years, been gravely affected by the “loud, intrusive and repetitive noise”.

In an extremely rare decision last April, High Court judge Mr Justice Simon ruled all three had been victims of “noise nuisance” and ordered Croft-Promo-Sport to pay Mr and Mrs Watson £109,600 damages, and Mrs Wilson £40,000.

The family’s legal costs from this hearing alone were put at about £700,000.

This week, David Hart, representing the Watsons and Mrs Wilson in the Court of Appeal, said the criticism of the original ruling was wholly unjustified.

The Watsons and Mrs Wilson are cross-appealing against Mr Justice Simon’s refusal to grant them an injunction restricting noisy racing activities on the racetrack to 40 days a year.

In his ruling last year, Mr Justice Simon said they had been “deeply affected by the noise from the circuit for a number of years”.

Their objection was not to car and motorbike racing events, which take place on the track on about 50 days a year, but to vehicle testing days and track days, when members of the public drive cars around the track at high speed.

The judge awarded them damages based on the “blight” on the value of their homes caused by the noise, and for their “loss of amenity”

in their homes.

The Northern Echo contacted the Watsons yesterday but the family declined to comment.

Richard Jones, representing Croft-Promo-Sport, said the court decision would have serious implications for the future of the racetrack and had left the company exposed to huge legal costs, and open to other potential claims by an “uncertain number” of neighbouring landowners.

Larry Carter, who handles public relations for Croft Circuit, said: “If any restrictions are put on Croft it would have huge implications for the local sporting fraternity and the local economy.

“It brings thousands of people to the area every year and is the only facility south of Knockhill, in Scotland, and north of Donnington. Motor sports fans from a huge catchment area go there.

“Financially, the circuit is probably worth £3m to the local economy. People come and stay in nearby hotels, eat at local restaurants and fill up their cars at the garages.

“If racing at Croft goes, it would be a blow to everybody in the region.”

Given the difficulty and importance of the case, ruling judges at the Court of Appeal are expected to reserve their decision until later this year.


Your Say YourNorth-East

dell12345, Newton Aycliffe says...
9:39am Sat 17 Jan 09

i'm sorry but if i was buying a house next door to a race track the first thing that would go through my head would be noise levels ????? What about people who live near airports or railway lines, will they be wanting compensation to. NO...they have to put up with it. Croft circuit has been there years, long before these people moved in.

muddypaws, says...
8:50pm Sat 17 Jan 09

I fully concur with Dell's comment regarding being aware of the race circuit when purchasing the property. I live in Thruxton which is a 'sister' circuit to Croft and yes, we were aware of not only the noise but traffic when we bought our home however I can say that the circuit helps with a great deal of fundraising for the affected villages and Mr Dennis Carter has been particularly good. Have the claimants in this case ever done anything for their local community? An interesting question to ask as I am sure Croft Circuit helps with local fundraising where possible.

petershaw, darlington says...
9:52pm Sat 17 Jan 09

croft circuit has been there for so many years it is not right that someone can come along and complain about the noise now. they must have known that living next door to a race track it will be noisy on race days, they just see it as a money making scam, why dont they move if their quality of life has been so badly affected.

Helen2202, Newton Aycliffe says...
9:38am Sun 18 Jan 09

Dont move next to a race track if you dont want noise issues ! People like this really boil my blood, money grabbers is the only words i can find to put on here. It's like someone moving into a house next to Heathrow then complaining !!!

If the above is true that one of them is the ex of a former manager of croft, then she should have packed up and gone a long time by the sounds of it !

Chocmonster, Darlington says...
11:59am Sun 18 Jan 09

I'm not surprised that this has happened. The people didn't do their homework before they moved in. Racing has taken place there for over 40 years and before that it was a bomber base in the war.

A Facebook group has been started and already has over 900 members which shows the feeling people have about this.

http://www.facebook.
com/group.php?gid=56
260629746

Racing fans are sick of others pushing us around!

BTCC fan, Near Brands Hatch says...
3:57pm Sun 18 Jan 09

How ridiculous! Did they live there before Croft was bulit? Our local circuit, Brands Hatch, had a similar problem but came up with a "noise management plan" - http://www.sevenoaks
.gov.uk/environment/
pests_nuisance_and_n
oise/3273.asp

Must go - I need to write a letter of complaint about the church bells waking me up on a Sunday, the church has only been there for 900 years so they won't have a leg to stand on!

Jon race nut, Daventry says...
9:10pm Sun 18 Jan 09

How pathetic?
Lets move house and live by the side of a busy racetrack and then when we have been there for a few years lets complain and suer the track owners so there business goes bust and deprive thousands of people of their one great love of motorsport. The residents moved in the full knowledge of the noise and as for the Judge well he needs de-barring for putting up with this stupidity and should have laughed them out of court.
I live adjacent to Silverstone and we have Track days, testing and races virtually every day of the year and I assure you its 20 times busier than croft and if you know how loud F1 cars and they visit 16 times a year then its a whole lot noiser but we dont complain. The track look after us and we them. That is because we are "good neighbours" and live in harmony!
There is now a group on facebook against this decision and there are plans for the main events at Croft to be mobbed this year....30,000 is nothing we had over 140,000 for the F1 in Silverstone last year and more this are expected!
Someone tell the Watsons/Wilson to get a life please!

motorsportfan, Dunfermline says...
9:17pm Sun 18 Jan 09

A sad state of affairs, since they knew a circuit pre-existed on this site before they arrived. Wish I could afford to live next to a racing circuit. Instead I live near a motorway and noisy road network. Wonder if I could sue the government for noise disturbance ? I travel from Scotland to the majority of motorsport events at Croft. This brings money to the local economy and immense enjoyment to myself and friends. What value could I place on the loss of my hobby and the chance to meet and watch the people who are passionate about their sport?

Ripla, Northallerton says...
9:56pm Sun 18 Jan 09

This is seriously unfair and unjustified, echoing many of the comments above I feel that Croft have been treated unfairly here.
Croft, like many other race circuits in the UK has been at the heart of 'noise' issues for some time now and I fear that this ruling is going to open the floodgates, not just for residents near Croft but across the nation.
Lets face it, if your neighbour complained about the smell from a local flower shop and 'won' £150k as a result would you also complain? **** sure I would.

This is rediculous and needs overturning right now! Race Circuits, Airports, Factorys and general 'noise' makers across the UK - Be afraid!

full story here.. http://www.richardbu
xton.co.uk/v3.0/?q=n
ode/334

Jolly Roger, Co Durham says...
11:17pm Sun 18 Jan 09

Well it is the same when people buy housees next to Village Halls, Pubs, Clubs and the like that have been there for years, then complain to the council about the noise,.

Then we the tax payers have to pay for sound proofing.

So I say the law should be changed to one which reads if the noise existed before you moved there, you have no comback if you find it to noisy for you, as you knew before hand what it was.


crowns, Chipping Norton says...
12:00am Mon 19 Jan 09

I attend many races at Croft, stay at local hotels, etc. I too agree with the views that they should move house. The UK is being ruined with Health & Safety, red tape, etc. When village pubs close through lack of trade, the biggest objectors are those who never used the pub and complained about the pub users.

Motoring fans pay the wages of these silly judges. See your MP about changing the law: seek the right to continue with "long established use pass times", ie flying, go karting, motor racing on old WW2 airfields, etc.


Mrs-P, says...
11:11am Mon 19 Jan 09

We can only hope that others in the area have an inkling of common sense. Who on earth in their right mind would move near to a race track, then spend £700,000 sueing for the noise it produces in order to win £150,000!!! These people clearly have far more money than sense, in which case... just move!!!!!

_gilly_, Barnard Castle says...
12:14pm Mon 19 Jan 09

Firstly the opportunity of living within 300m of the circuit would be amazing, waking up to such beautiful music!!

Would the residents prefer the existing use of the circuit as an aerodrome, I am sure Durham Tees Valley would consider the advantages of a second site!

Stanto, Redcar says...
1:03pm Mon 19 Jan 09

There's a facebook group showing their support for croft!
http://www.facebook.
com/group.php?gid=56
260629746

crowns, Chipping Norton says...
1:22pm Mon 19 Jan 09

There is nothing worse than noisy neighbours, loud music from pubs, etc, but this is an entirely different case (it seems that the judge is treating this as a similar case). I am not a law expert, but I believe that if a High Court Appeal Judge makes a ruling, that rule could then be cited in all future cases. For example, if an appeal judge ruled that if somebody moved into the area, once a long established public hobby or practice had already existed, then that new arrival should not have grounds to object. If it was a case of somebody already living in the area, before that public hobby/practice began, then they should be entitled to have a fair hearing. Croft should ask their lawyer to check this out.

Karters at the old RAF station at Rissinton have had their track dates reduced. People who kart at the old RAF station at Shennington are not allowed to dive to the track through the village (they have to do a detour). Many other clubs (flying, etc) are in the same boat, and have continual hassle.

trackcar, sheffield says...
2:45pm Mon 19 Jan 09

This is of great concern to anyone interested in motorsports, not only for people (like me) who rate croft as one of the best driving circuits in the country, but also for other race circuits who may have already , or may in the near future, be faced with similar legal action being taken against them.

This country is rapidly becoming an unsavoury place to live, I despise with a passion the actions of the family involved in bring this case against croft, but also I despise the actions of the judge who awarded them 150,000 pounds .. that sets a precedent for every money-grabbing close-circuit dweller to lodge their own cases whether they feel their lifestyle is compromised or not .. 150,000 pounds can make even the most morally upstanding citizen keel over in times of financial crisis.

I am sickened and appalled by such a disgraceful miscarriage of justice.

Nick Wright, Doncaster says...
6:25pm Mon 19 Jan 09

I have been talking to the circuit at length today since I heard the news over the weekend.

I doubt very much if the race circuit will have to close - it may however have to reduce the amount of midweek activity that is not related to race meetings.. that could mean us with our trackdays!

It is extemely unlikely that an outcome will be resolved before the end of the year, and so for this season at least our trackdays there will go ahead as planned.

I have always kept our days there as quiet as possible by restricting the entry to cars of a certain, shall we say 'volume'. We are acknowledged as being one of the good guys, never yet tripping the sound meter in all the time we have been going up to Croft.

In fairness to the resident family that live over the fence - yes, motor racing has gone on there for years but always on a weekend.
It is the non stop everyday activity of trackdays and testing that has come about since the circuit was modernised in the 90's that they are complaning about.

I sincerely hope that good judgement will prevail - but I fear in these days of no win no fee litigation that there will be a case to answer as the lawfirm working for the families are using this as a test case and are funding it all the way to the high court.

In the meantime keep your fingers crossed!

Mash, N.E. says...
6:40pm Mon 19 Jan 09

Legally, moving to the nuisance does not prevent you from bringing an action in court. However, there is a famous case where the court did not grant an injuction to a couple who had moved in next to a cricket ground. That was in Linz in Co. Durham. Seems there is hope for Croft yet!

shauniebabes, Darlington says...
6:54pm Mon 19 Jan 09

The claimants, Derek and Julia Watson and their daughter, Jill Wilson just happen to be the parents in law and ex wife of the ex-manger of Croft Circuit. The ex-manager who was also the property developer responsible for house Jill Watson lives in. The house bought by Mrs Watson's parents after her messy divorce.

Strange that only they have a problem with noise.....




crowns, Chipping Norton says...
7:18pm Mon 19 Jan 09

I note Nick Wright's comment about testing since the 90's. Individuals who lived there prior to the changes in the 90's may have some grounds to complain. The UK is the centre of world motor sport and motor engineering, ie a valuable foreign currency earner. Because of such restrictions engineers and drivers are forced abroad to places like Spain and Asia to test. Foreign engineers and teams rub their hands and look for more profit, when they hear of our squabbles

They are updating and building better facilities, abroad, through profits. Croft Circuit does not even have an indoor tea room for race fans, when it rains, so where is it going to get £150,000 to pay this fine?

kimbo, Weatheroak says...
8:44am Tue 20 Jan 09

The judge has a case to answer here! Thought these guys were meant to be logical - circuit there before the Watsons therefore they knew (or should have done) what they were buying into. In effect they could be getting a substantial discount on their house for being thick.

Nick Wright, Doncaster says...
6:08pm Tue 20 Jan 09

shauniebabes wrote:
The claimants, Derek and Julia Watson and their daughter, Jill Wilson just happen to be the parents in law and ex wife of the ex-manger of Croft Circuit. The ex-manager who was also the property developer responsible for house Jill Watson lives in. The house bought by Mrs Watson's parents after her messy divorce. Strange that only they have a problem with noise.....
Ah - I see now. They are Jimmy's ex in laws that are causing the problem.

crowns, Chipping Norton says...
12:34am Wed 21 Jan 09

Nick Wright, Doncaster says Jan 09: Ah - I see They are Jimmy's ex in laws that are causing the problem.

I do not know the background, so what I say is guess work. The issue here is a £700,000 legal fee. In all probability, the Watsons made a simple query with an unscrupulous lawyer, who told by them that they had a great case, ie Watsons were taken to the cleaners.

Re comments about "no win no fee": Does anybody on this planet believe that a lawyer is giving a free £700,000 fee (a free £700,000 lunch from a lawyer!!) Many barristers charge £1,000+vat per hour!!

The real losers are:
The fans
Croft Circuit
The Watsons

The winners are:
The Lawyers, barristers.
The Judge's salary (via the Watson's court fees).

"Trackcar's comments "country being an unsavoury place to live in" are spot-on. Final thoughts:

a) The economy is being undermined by unscrupulous lawyers who exploit health & safety, using bait of "no win no fee". Hence the new phrase "Broken Britain".

b) Would the Watsons have embarked on this, if they had known that it would have cost them £700,000 in fees (my local hospice could do with £700,000)?

c) If the Watsons asked the Council for a rate rebate, their reply would be, ie "you moved here, knowing of the noise".

d) Judge's decisions should mirror the Council's view.

the bear, Lartington says...
2:07am Wed 21 Jan 09

as if this got time in the court of appeal. anyone, with even the most limited grasp of reality would detect a undertone of bitterness in this.

i intended to post a comment on the utter stupidity of this but I am truly lost for words...

as if the bitterness of a divorcee could bring an end to motorsport in the northeast...the lunacy of this country never fails to anger me. Must go, I have to go and bang my head against a wall!

Ty Nicholson, Ythanbank, near Aberdeen says...
8:00am Wed 21 Jan 09

Test & general public Track Days are major revenue earners for the circuits and without them racing itself could be placed under threat. If I remember correctly, didn't Mrs Wilson once hold a racing competiion licence?. I don't recall any family complaints when ex-husband Jimmy was working very hard at the circuit and putting food on the table.

Billy Wiz, Yarm says...
11:09am Wed 21 Jan 09

Hmmm. Moved into a village near Yarm 20 years ago, next door to an arable farm. Just found out that the humming noise in the summer is a grain-dryer, that the lights in the sky are because I moved near an airport that pre dates me by over half a century, and that clanging noise on a Sunday morning has been going on for 800 years. I think that they should all stop and pay me £150,000 each. No, hold that; I'll take a £300k bung now in readies from the first two, and guaranteed safe passage upstairs from the Big Fella in lieu of cash on the third. What a joke! These people knew the circuit was there before they moved, they were actually involved with the circuit and it mysteriously only become an vindictive issue after a divorce, and they should pay all of the circuits legal fees. I'm not even a motorsport fan, I'm just a fan of common sense. Its an absolute disgrace that this has been allowed to go this far. This country's litigious society is spiralling out of control. Enough's enough.

PettyComplainer, Darlington says...
12:57pm Wed 21 Jan 09

This is like people who buy houses next to schools, then spend the rest of their days shooing people off parking near them and calling the police about parking nuisance etc. There seems to be some history here, so for once I'll shut up because I don't know the full story!

crowns, Chipping Norton says...
1:26pm Wed 21 Jan 09

Mindful of lawyers' enormous profits, the Watsons and the Circuit owners' lives must be a misery, sleepless nights, etc. Given the danger to jobs at Croft, etc, and the possibility that the matter could go to a EU Court (more money for lawyers), I feel that the Watsons and the circuit owners, should try to amicably sort this out (without the use of lawyers) for everybody's peace of mind, and the future of the UK motor sport industry.

(I would chair the meeting)

gareth2505, Bishop Auckland says...
8:20pm Wed 21 Jan 09

I still dont understand the complaint, croft has been there for many years, before it was a race track, it was an RAF base, which is noisy.
When you look for a new home, you check the local area for noise ect, so how could they miss a huge race track. Race days are restricted and are very noisiy, but are orhganised with a lot of notice, and all trackdays that I have been one have a noise limit, which is the same as a road legal car or motorbike.

For gods sake, i live on a RAF base, do i care about noise, NO, it is required. If i lived by a track, would i complain, NO, it provides for the conomy, especially in times like now of economic problems

J Blake, Uttoxeter says...
8:22pm Wed 21 Jan 09

As the Coordinator of the Ma5da MX5 Championship, I am amased by how someone can buy a house only 300M from the Circuit and then expect it to have the tranquility of a remote cottage in the middle of a national country park?

Should it not be the estate agent or perhaps the Solicitor who legally completed the purchase of the property that they should be taking to court? Maybe they plan to do that next.

One thing is for sure Croft Circuit has been providing motorsport facilities long before the Watson's moved North.

Where will it all end!

Time to buy a house in Croft, I am a dedicated motorsport competitor and it looks like you can earn a good living from WORKING the circuit! Criminal!

J Blake
www.ma5daracing.com

crowns, Chipping Norton says...
1:09pm Thu 22 Jan 09

It is clear from all of the above comments that the vast public do not agree with the Judge's rulings. This judge should have been aware of public feelings and their work interests/enjoyment. Enjoyment is not a luxury, ie most hobbies are an essential requirement of life, for hard working people who need an outlet/recreation, after work.

Judges' decisions are essentially meant to reflect the overall wishes of the people, hence why judges change certain elements of statutes, etc. The courts have a moral and legal obligation to act in the overall public interest.

joxsmith, peterlee says...
5:34pm Fri 23 Jan 09

How highly annoying!!!! The money that the circuit brings to the local economy especially at the current time is much needed ....... unlike the moaning of the people who insisted on living next to it!!! If they get their wish and Croft Circuit closes then I hope the site used it to recycle waste!! Very green and not remotely noisy ...... pity about the smell!!! Oooo, what about an abotoir!!

daveyp, Stockton on Tees says...
9:29am Sat 24 Jan 09

What is the world coming to? This is not a village problem, a regional problem but is a national problem. Not wanting to repeat what others have said above but the region and motorsport in general would be lost without a fantastic circuit such as Croft. Why buy a house next to a motor racing circuit if you are bothered by the noise. Ludicrous.

is it me!, toft hill says...
8:16pm Sun 25 Jan 09

Same thing happened at Scarbro'(Olivers Mount).Somebody moved near the circuit and within two years tried to get the racing stopped.He lost!!.I'm going to buy a house on the Isle of Man.I'll soon have that TT stopped.Total stupidity.

crowns, Chipping Norton says...
3:44pm Fri 6 Feb 09

I think that Bernie Eccleston should come to the aid of Croft Circuit, eg use his lawyers (or his money) to appeal the current decision to the Lords, or the UE Courts. Croft is where the likes of Hamilton honed his skills (Formula Renault, etc), which in turn has helped Formula 1 (and ultimately added to Bernie's good fortune). If other UK circuits suffer a similar fate, all of the UK's motoring expertise will disappear.

madcowlozzyloo, South Church says...
6:43pm Wed 18 Feb 09

I bet that this Jill Wilson and her parents were not complaining when they were making money out of Croft... all i can say is that if they dont like the noise then MOVE there are plenty more houses up for sale... i can assure you i would move next to croft now if they wanna do a house swap.... SADDOS

atky, wetherby says...
9:20pm Wed 18 Feb 09

i have been racing bikes at croft for many years, it is my local circuit and always provides great racing from club level to bsb, for 3 spiteful people to jeapordise not only our enjoyment but also the local economy is criminal, maybe they should get in touch with the estate agent who sold them their house and ask for the 4sale board !!

Your sayYour North-East

comment Add your comment

Register for a FREE The Northern Echo account and you can have your say on today's news and sport by adding comments on articles we publish. The best comments may even get published in the paper.

Please register now or sign in below to continue.

RACETRACK NOISE: Cars compete at Croft circuit RACETRACK NOISE: Cars compete at Croft circuit

Local Advertisers

Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »