I HATE many of the words that appear in common use today.
One of the worst is the adjective “must have”, as applied to a vast number of consumer goods. This implies a total absorption of a well-off user in his/herself. If such a purchase is undertaken, I suggest that the person concerned should give a similar amount to charity.
The other is “politically correct”. This implies that a carefully-worded action does not offend a person or group. This “politically correct” approach to speech or writing should never be needed. Remember the old saying “sticks and stones may break my bones, but words will never hurt me”. Never before has this statement been so true.
We should be able to speak and act honestly, without fear of criticism or retribution.
Mrs AE Carr, Middleton St George.
I MUST comment on Peter Barron’s view regarding an article written by Harry Mead (Echo, Nov 17). I just loved reading the last paragraph about David Walliams and Matt Lucas: “So, just to make it absolutely clear, David Walliams and Matt Lucas might urinate over the floor and vomit at ladies’ tea parties, but they have absolutely never sung a song about having a crap on a train. We’re sorry for giving the wrong impression.”
I think you made a point in no uncertain manner.
J Dyson, Seaham.
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here