News RSS Feed


National Blood Service in "homophobic" row


Two students’ unions have banned the National Blood Service from promoting itself in their buildings because they say it discriminates against gay male students.

Both Newcastle and Sunderland University’s elected councils voted to approve the motion to ban the service from having a ‘‘visible’’ presence in their buildings.

The National Blood Service has a policy preventing homosexual men from donating blood because they are deemed a ’high risk’ category of contracting blood-borne viruses, including HIV and Hepatitis B.

Donation sessions are still operated on campus by universities, but the ban prevents would-be donors from accessing information and advertising within the students’ unions.

Both Newcastle and Sunderland University’s policies have been in place from 2005. Greg Du Bois, Sunderland University’s student union president, said that the executive committee voted to reinstate the policy this year after the ban was lifted for the previous 12 months.

‘‘The ban has been in place for about four years,’’ he said.

‘‘They don’t allow gay men to give blood and that has been determined as not a satisfactory reason.’’ The National Blood Service said that men who have had sex with other men are excluded from donating blood based on data collected by the Health Protection Agency.

Dr Patricia Hewitt, consultant specialist in transfusion microbiology at the National Blood Service, said: ‘‘There is a common misconception that the policy is homophobic.

‘‘However, our job - purely and simply - is to make sure there is enough blood for patients, and that the blood we provide is as safe as possible.

‘‘We can’t rely on testing alone to ensure this, we also have to make sure donors are at the lowest possible risk of infections which can be transmitted by blood.

‘‘If evidence shows that their behaviour - sexual or otherwise - puts them at increased risk they are asked not to donate.’’ Dr Hewitt added: ‘‘To collect 7,000 donations of blood every day we have to look at whether people fall into broad risk categories based on scientific evidence, rather than the circumstances of each individual.’’


Your Say YourNorth-East

markdarlo, Darlington says...
3:37pm Tue 11 Nov 08

everyone can get aids and any other virus ect.. so therefore isnt everyone a high risk ???? excuses escuses people need to get with the times. idiots !

Heat1969, Newton Aycliffe says...
4:33pm Tue 11 Nov 08

Having been a blood donor for many years I can say that 'gay' men are not the only people who cannot give blood. There are many other reasons why certain people within society are unable to give blood. The reasons for which are many and make logical and common sense to most people. These exemptions are there for the protection of ill and injured people who need blood to survive and being able to reduce as many risks of infection and virus makes sense. Well it does to your average rational thinking, no hidden agenda, person on the street.

Cazovey, Newton Aycliffe says...
1:24pm Sun 15 Feb 09

In fairness, if there was proof that gay or bisexual men were infact higher risk I'd happily say that they shouldn't give blood. But that's all we ever hear, they're high risk, we never actually get given proper reasons why they are high risk. Plus, if the tests aren't sufficient to see if a gay person has blood defects, they aren't sufficient for a straight person either, so thats another useless arguement.

Your sayYour North-East

comment Add your comment

Register for a FREE The Northern Echo account and you can have your say on today's news and sport by adding comments on articles we publish. The best comments may even get published in the paper.

Please register now or sign in below to continue.


Local Advertisers

Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »