Charge dropped against driver accused over multi-vehicle crash

Accused van driver left Durham Crown Court "without stain on character".

Accused van driver left Durham Crown Court "without stain on character".

First published in News The Northern Echo: Static HTML image by , Chief Reporter (Durham)

PROCEEDINGS have been dropped against a motorist previously accused of being responsible for a multi-vehicle collision.

A “medical cause” is now said to have resulted in a van driver losing consciousness shortly before the accident involving up to eight vehicles on the A167, near Ferryhill, County Durham,on Friday, June 1, 2012.

Several people were injured, one critically, when the northbound Renault Master van veered across the road, into the path of a number of vehicles heading in the opposite direction, approaching Dean Bank.

John Robson Lonsdale was driving the van, returning home from work with a colleague, when the collision took place, shortly before 3.45pm.

Mr Lonsdale, now 55, of Commercial Square, Brandon, near Durham, was subsequently accused of dangerous driving.

He denied the charge at Durham Crown Court in March last year and his trial was set to start two months later.

But it has since been put back several times awaiting the outcome of reports by prosecution and defence experts into the circumstances leading to the accident.

Days before the latest listing of the trial, at the court next Monday (July 21), the case was called on for ‘mention’ yesterday (Thursday July 17).

Peter Sabiston, for the prosecution, told the hearing: “During the course of the investigation and, indeed, preparation for trial, both the defence and Crown appointed experts to look into what might have been the cause of the incident and they have produced a joint report.

“Both now believe Mr Lonsdale suffered a loss of consciousness immediately preceding the accident due to a medical cause.

“Given the burden of proof on the Crown, it is felt it can’t prove the case.”

Mr Sabiston, therefore, offered ‘no evidence’ on behalf of the Crown and invited Judge Brian Forster to return a formal ‘not guilty’ verdict.

Judge Forster did so, and told Mr Sabiston: “I have considered all the papers and appreciate it’s been a difficult case on all the facts.

“I’m conscious a very serious injury was sustained, but it’s clear you have prepared the case to a very high standard and the appropriate decisions have been made.

“It’s the only decision that could be made on the evidence before the court.”

Addressing Mr Lonsdale Judge Forster said: “I’m sorry you have been involved in matters which have taken a long time to conclude.

“It’s a case which affected a lot of people and it’s been difficult on all sides, but you leave the court without a stain on your character.”

He said the issue of defence costs would be considered in due course.

The judge also asked the Crown to send an explanation of events to solicitors representing the most seriously injured victim of the accident.

No explanation was aired as to the “medical cause” referred to during the hearing.

Comments (2)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

5:49am Thu 21 Aug 14

mattyjack2 says...

Seems like a free for all then doesn't it! Maim innocent folk and claim to have passed out. That defence now proven to have worked will no doubt be wheeled out time and again. Well done criminal justice sytem.
Seems like a free for all then doesn't it! Maim innocent folk and claim to have passed out. That defence now proven to have worked will no doubt be wheeled out time and again. Well done criminal justice sytem. mattyjack2
  • Score: 0

10:06am Thu 21 Aug 14

smokin says...

my son witnessed this incident and had to get someone out of a car who.s door was jammed and gave his statement to the police there was no sign of "passing out " and why is he still driving if he has a condition where he passes out surely DVLA should be informed and his licence revoked or it will happen again
my son witnessed this incident and had to get someone out of a car who.s door was jammed and gave his statement to the police there was no sign of "passing out " and why is he still driving if he has a condition where he passes out surely DVLA should be informed and his licence revoked or it will happen again smokin
  • Score: 1

Comments are closed on this article.

Send us your news, pictures and videos

Most read stories

Local Info

Enter your postcode, town or place name

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree