Consultation reveals widespread support for Durham Tees Valley Airport rescue plan

MASTER PLAN: Most respondents were in favour of the plans for the future of Durham Tees Valley Airport

MASTER PLAN: Most respondents were in favour of the plans for the future of Durham Tees Valley Airport

First published in News
Last updated
The Northern Echo: Photograph of the Author by , Regional Chief Reporter

A RESCUE plan to secure the future of Durham Tees Valley Airport has widespread support, a study has found.

More than 70 per cent of respondents to a two-month consultation backed the vision and objectives set out in a draft master plan, airport bosses said.

According to the findings, 87 per cent of people supported plans for a business park beside the airport and the potential development of land south of the runway.

However, a smaller number - 60 per cent - were in favour of a new housing complex on the site.

Airport strategic planning director Peter Nears said the results of the consultation were encouraging and all feedback would be taken into account.

He added: “The majority of the feedback was positive and supportive, but obviously there were questions raised about certain aspects which we will now consider very carefully in drawing up the final plan.

“It is important to stress that the whole objective of this process is to reposition the airport in such a way that we can develop a viable business model and investment strategy for the long-term.”

Mr Nears said few airports could survive on revenues from passenger traffic alone.

“The airport has land assets, which provide the development opportunities we must pursue if we are to improve the whole DTVA operation,” he said.

The airport said the master plan aimed to set out the development of the facility to 2020 and beyond, with the creation of 3,800 permanent new jobs and a further 450 during construction phases.

The plan refocuses the airport on business customers, although leisure destinations accessible via Amsterdam Schiphol Airport will be promoted.

The terminal building will be remodelled, while a mix of offices and hangars will be built around the terminal. St George's Hotel will also be extended.

Between 250 and 400 homes are proposed, with the sale of the land for housing paying for other developments on the site.

The plan for housing has angered residents of nearby Middleton St George which claim local services would not cope with more users.

The airport said a dedicated master plan website received 1,400 hits, while around 900 people attended consultation events.

Submissions were received from 130 individuals and organisations.

The finished plan is expected to be published in late March or early April.

Comments (4)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

4:54pm Thu 27 Feb 14

DarloXman says...

70% of just 130 respondents is not "widespread"
70% of just 130 respondents is not "widespread" DarloXman
  • Score: 2

12:02pm Fri 28 Feb 14

Grandba says...

I wasn't even aware there was a Master plan consultation period!!
Surely, some notification should have been posted through every home in each borough which contributes to the running of the airport. I most certainly would not have backed plans by the tax evading, walk all over people, Peel Group.
Teesside airport should be kept as a passenger airport with more encouragement given to airline and tour operators to use it. The land should not be sold of for housing or any other use.
Peel want to do to Teesside, exactly what they did to Sheffield airport - close it ! Peel have to much influence throughout the country! So many people would be amazed how many pies Peel have their grubby little fingers in! Just do an internet search.
I wasn't even aware there was a Master plan consultation period!! Surely, some notification should have been posted through every home in each borough which contributes to the running of the airport. I most certainly would not have backed plans by the tax evading, walk all over people, Peel Group. Teesside airport should be kept as a passenger airport with more encouragement given to airline and tour operators to use it. The land should not be sold of for housing or any other use. Peel want to do to Teesside, exactly what they did to Sheffield airport - close it ! Peel have to much influence throughout the country! So many people would be amazed how many pies Peel have their grubby little fingers in! Just do an internet search. Grandba
  • Score: 1

12:02pm Fri 28 Feb 14

Grandba says...

I wasn't even aware there was a Master plan consultation period!!
Surely, some notification should have been posted through every home in each borough which contributes to the running of the airport. I most certainly would not have backed plans by the tax evading, walk all over people, Peel Group.
Teesside airport should be kept as a passenger airport with more encouragement given to airline and tour operators to use it. The land should not be sold of for housing or any other use.
Peel want to do to Teesside, exactly what they did to Sheffield airport - close it ! Peel have to much influence throughout the country! So many people would be amazed how many pies Peel have their grubby little fingers in! Just do an internet search.
I wasn't even aware there was a Master plan consultation period!! Surely, some notification should have been posted through every home in each borough which contributes to the running of the airport. I most certainly would not have backed plans by the tax evading, walk all over people, Peel Group. Teesside airport should be kept as a passenger airport with more encouragement given to airline and tour operators to use it. The land should not be sold of for housing or any other use. Peel want to do to Teesside, exactly what they did to Sheffield airport - close it ! Peel have to much influence throughout the country! So many people would be amazed how many pies Peel have their grubby little fingers in! Just do an internet search. Grandba
  • Score: 2

1:29pm Tue 4 Mar 14

gramps427 says...

So just over 10% of the 1000 individuals & "organisation" that attended Peel's consultation actually made a submission; so shouldn't the percentages of people who actually supported the plan read 90 people/organisations backed the plans and that 78 people/organisations backed building houses or in % terms 8.5% & 7.5%; compare that to the 3041 individuals who have signed the petition at change.org.
So just over 10% of the 1000 individuals & "organisation" that attended Peel's consultation actually made a submission; so shouldn't the percentages of people who actually supported the plan read 90 people/organisations backed the plans and that 78 people/organisations backed building houses or in % terms 8.5% & 7.5%; compare that to the 3041 individuals who have signed the petition at change.org. gramps427
  • Score: 0

Comments are closed on this article.

Send us your news, pictures and videos

Most read stories

Local Info

Enter your postcode, town or place name

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree