Stand-alone role of Durham mayor faces axe (From The Northern Echo)
For details on how to contact our editorial and commercial departments, click here
Stand-alone role of Durham mayor faces axe
6:30pm Wednesday 20th March 2013 in News
By Mark Tallentire, Reporter (Durham)
THE stand-alone role of mayor of Durham, which dates back more than 400 years, could disappear, under a shake-up announced today (Wednesday, March 20).
Durham County Council leader Simon Henig said having one person serve as mayor and council chairman would save hundreds of thousands of pounds in taxpayers’ money.
He told a County Hall meeting Labour would pursue the change if it holds the council after May’s elections, but it represented ‘no threat at all to the mayor of Durham’ and was simply a matter of reducing costs.
Chester, which has had a mayor since 1240, had already made the change and “the walls are still standing”, he said.
However, Liberal Democrats, who control the Charter Trustees which appoint the mayor, said it was an attempt to scrap the mayoralty.
Lib Dem leader Nigel Martin said: “If it’s seen that the county makes a takeover of the historic, hundreds of years old mayor of Durham City, there will be all hell to pay at the ballot box.”
Former mayor Dennis Southwell said city residents would be appalled.
However, Labour Charter Trustee Jim Cordon said the Lib Dems regarded the mayor’s office as their own political powerbase and the role was costing £102,000 a year.
Coun Henig said the mayor had cost half a million pounds since 2009 and its hospitality budget had increased by more than 20 per cent in each of the last two years.
He accused the Lib Dems of “staggering hypocrisy” and Coun Southwell of making “utterly ludicrous” comments.
The title mayor of Durham dates to 1602 and is the fifth most senior in the UK, after London, York, Belfast and Cardiff. The mayor ranks third in the local hierarchy, after the Queen and the Lord Lieutenant.
Durham’s mayor has a ceremonial bodyguard – the oldest of its kind outside London, dating from the 13th century.
The row came as Coun Henig announced a review of civic expenses.
Earlier this month, it was claimed the council paid its chairman and vice-chairman so-called clothing allowances totalling more than £12,000 a year.
Making her first public remarks on the row today, current chairman Linda Marshall said some comments had been personal, downright nasty and untrue and insisted neither she nor any other council member received a clothing allowance.
The money was for “unavoidable” costs including charity events, cards and catering, she said.
“This is not a clothing allowance and it’s time all members respected the position of the chairman and let’s stop deceiving the public,” Coun Marshall said.
A cross-party constitutional working group will begin the expenses review, which will include the costs of the mayor of Durham, next week.
Comments(9)
is thesunabovetheyardarm
says...
7:18pm Wed 20 Mar 13
Presumably some arrangement was made whereby the City of Durham retains the ancient position of Mayor (and why not) but that position is held by and was generally regarded as an honour conferred for local distinction, long service on the Council, or for past services. The mayor (who had to be a serving elected councillor) was expected to devote much of his (or her) time to civic, ceremonial, and representational functions, and to preside over meetings for the advancement of the public welfare. His or her administrative duties are to act as returning officer at parliamentary elections, and as chairman of the meetings of the council.
Now, if the DCC is to combine the roles of Chairman and Mayor, we will likely have the situation where the Mayor is not someone of 'local distinction, long service on the Council, or for past services from within the City boundaries, but could be someone from, say, Trimdon.
This is crazy in my view. Some people clearly have no pride in their civic and municipal history.
caberwocky1
says...
9:30pm Wed 20 Mar 13
Do they get a clothing allowance as well?
Jolly Roger
says...
10:13pm Wed 20 Mar 13
He cannot say Durham City mayor is going and not the others.
As HE is only in charge of Durham County Council and NOT Durham City is he.
jsrace
says...
1:21pm Thu 21 Mar 13
“This is not a clothing allowance and it’s time all members respected the position of the chairman and let’s stop deceiving the public,”End Quote.
Quote: Alan Napier
He said: “ covers all expenses associated with being the chairman and is not solely a clothing allowance.” End Quote.
Quote: Linda Marshall
it’s time all members respected the position of the chairman and let’s stop deceiving the public,”End Quote.
It is called a “Clothing Allowance” but is not a “Clothing Allowance”.
Quote: Linda Marshall “let’s stop deceiving the public,”, End Quote.
I would like to see this happen, but I am pretty sure that a lot of the top people in D.C.C. Won't be prepared to give up their meal ticket to the gravy train.
D D Coy
says...
5:44pm Thu 21 Mar 13
2011/12 SPENNYMOOR TOWN COUNCILLORS ANNUAL ALLOWANCE £1500.00p
2011/12 BISHOP AUCKLAND TOWN COUNCILLORS ANNUAL ALLOWANCE £440.04p
Both towns are of similar size & both are controlled by Labour, yet Spennymoor Town Councillors receive £1059.96p more per annum or 240% more in allowances + expenses, compared to Bishop Auckland.
Simple Question: Why & Who Benefits..?
Simple Answer: Certainly not the electorate of Spennymoor..!
• LABOUR CONTROLLED SPENNYMOOR TOWN COUNCIL AWARDED THE RISE AT THE ONSET OF AUSTERITY
• SPENNYMOOR RESIDENTS PAY AMONGST THE HIGHEST LEVELS OF COUNCIL TAX IN THE ENTIRE COUNTRY.
• IN 2011/12 THE MAYOR OF SPENNYMOOR RECEIVED IN EXCESS OF 7X MORE THAN THEIR BISHOP AUCKLAND COUNTERPART.
• £1000’s HAVE BEEN WASTED ON FIRST CLASS TRAVEL & ACCOMODATION BY LABOUR COUNCILLORS.
• MOST WORRINGLY, SINCE 1997 1000’S OF JOBS HAVE DISSAPEARED FROM THE TOWN AND AREA FOREVER!
• HOUSING IS NOW BEING BUILT UPON THOSE FORMER FACTORY SITES BECAUSE D.C.C. PLANNERS APPARENTLY KNOW BEST? DO YOU REMEMBER THE BESSEMER PARK EXPERIMENT?
• THE PEDESTRENISATION OF HIGH STREET. ‘Durham County Council Planners will continue to make catastrophic errors of judgement, as inept Labour Councillors observe and fail to offer any alternative policy or even any form of objection’.
• ONLY ONE BISHOP AUCKLAND TOWN COUNCILLOR CLAIMED EXPENSES IN 2011/12 ON TOP OF THE BASIC ALLOWANCE, CAN YOU GUESS THE NUMBER OF SPENNYMOOR TOWN COUNCILLORS THAT CLAIMED EXPENSES?
IT WOULD APPEAR THAT SPENNYMOOR LABOUR COUNCILLORS BENEFIT WHILST HIDING BEHIND PARTY POLITICAL POLITICS WHILST REWARDING THEMSELVES.
“Your vote does count on 2nd of May 2013, ensure that you use your vote & please use it wisely as every penny counts!”
'In December 2012, I attempted to get the just of the above past the censor of the town council subsidised free community paper, but for some odd reason my letter was not published'.
If Henig wants to save money at DCC then he should resign forthwith, as he is clueless and out of touch with public opinion.
To use public funds to support Durham County Cricket Club is blatant electioneering on his behalf, as he is a Councillor for Chester le Street.
The club could be considered technically bankrupt due to over expansion and salaries. Yet, once the funding is in place they announce that they are to expand the seating capacity at the ground with the new funding, at of cost of £1.2m.
Why did they not hire extra seating? More capacity = more empty seats and increasing maintenance & staff cots in the long run.
And you can bet your bottom dollar that Durham County Council Cabinet have front row seats and free hospitality at all events from now on!
house fly
says...
6:39pm Thu 21 Mar 13
jsrace
says...
7:51pm Thu 21 Mar 13
How do you know 'D D Coy' is BNP? I read through His/Her post and cannot find a single mention that would suggest it is BNP rubbish.
Please enlighten us.
lesholloway
says...
1:51pm Fri 22 Mar 13
argo2013 says...
7:15pm Wed 20 Mar 13