Police officers under "massive pressure" not to record crime (From The Northern Echo)
For details on how to contact our editorial and commercial departments, click here
Police officers under "massive pressure" not to record crime
7:40am Friday 25th January 2013 in News
By Joe Willis, Regional Chief Reporter
POLICE in the region are coming under “massive pressure” not to record all crime incidents, a police federation boss has claimed amid fears that falling crime figures are misleading.
The comments from Cleveland Police Federation chair Steve Matthews support national concerns that budget cuts and pressure to hit targets have prompted police officers to exaggerate the rate at which crime has fallen in the last five years.
Figures released yesterday by the Office for National Statistics (ONS) show that recorded crime was down eight per cent in the North-East in the year to September 2012, compared to the previous 12 months.
Crime was down five per cent in the Cleveland Police area, nine per cent in Durham and ten per cent in Northumbria.
In North Yorkshire, the annual report showed a nine per cent drop in recorded crime.
The figures reveal that almost every type of crime fell in all four police areas in the region, with one of the few exceptions being fraud and forgery which increased in Cleveland and North Yorkshire.
However, Mr Matthews claimed the newly released figures for his force were not a true reflection of the levels of crime in the area.
He added: “There’s massive pressure on officers not to take reports of crime and I find that really worrying.
“I don’t want to worry the people of Cleveland but I think we’ve got to be honest and realistic about what’s happening.”
Cleveland Police announced a reorganisation earlier this week with 300 officers due to go by 2014.
Mr Matthews added: “If there are fewer boots on the ground you’re reported incidents are not going to be as high because you will have fewer people looking out for inquisitive crime.”
In response, Cleveland Police Temporary Assistant Chief Constable Adrian Roberts said crime recording was “heavily regulated and frequently audited”.
He added: “The context of the police federation’s comments is an understandable concern about the impact of falling police officer numbers, but there is no evidence of practices in Cleveland having changed, and I am totally clear with all officers that crime needs to be recorded ethically and in accordance with the national rules: integrity is non-negotiable.
“It is also fair to say that none of the concerns now expressed have been raised by the federation with me, despite recent opportunities to do so, and I am surprised at their questioning the integrity of their members.”
Nationally, police records have appeared to overstate the true rate at which crime has been falling by failing to take into account 400,000 offences, the ONS said.
A target culture was behind the discrepancy as police officers come under an informal pressure to slash crime, ONS experts claimed.
Labour yesterday called for reassurance that spending cuts were not behind the fall in recorded offences - but the Coalition insisted police forces had reduced crime on lower budgets.
Comments are closed on this article.
Comments (10)
8:21am Fri 25 Jan 13
Madadrian says...
I spent more time producing driving documents than the police did on finding the culprit. They just weren't bothered. Their expectation was that vehicle damage was covered by insurance so they need not do anything.
Since then we have suffered petty theft and vandalism. The last timewas a little over a year ago when we had a car window broken in an attempt to get into the glove compartment. I merely paid a bit over a hundred pounds for repair and put it behind me.
9:48am Fri 25 Jan 13
the-big-yin says...
10:41am Fri 25 Jan 13
Homshaw1 says...
This coupled with people's perception that it is a waste of time reporting it is the reason crime numbers are down.
In reality it is probably increasing.
10:56am Fri 25 Jan 13
Daza says...
Lets abolish the Police service. Get lots of security guards in who don't give a s..t Who will work the exact hours they are supposed to work. Then bring the private sector in who will want to make money from speeding tickets etc. etc.
Then lets sit around and watch the country go to rat s..t, then lets see how many people will complain then. This is another excuse to slag the Police off.
Recorded crime is down for many reasons, People not bothering to ring up, Govt. setting targets to justify their cuts, Police bosses under pressure to keep it down, Police officers under pressure not to record crime as the article suggests.
I would suggest that if Judges and Magistrates actually jailed more people, you know, protect the people of this country, crime would 'fall' even further.
I find it hard to believe that crime is actually down when you put into perspective the problems this country faces.
1:10pm Fri 25 Jan 13
Five 0 says...
Cleveland say that they are cutting back on officers, yet they still have expensive Cleveland Follies:
A. The helicopter (white elephant)
B. Large expensive cars for the chiefs.
C.The Donkeys with private stables
D. Expensive outside consultants.
Why spend a fortune on keeping the Donkeys and their private stables open, when those pc's could spend more time out on the streets instead of giving the donkeys a rub down and a feed for half their shift?
How much does keeping the donkeys cost and the helicopter cost each year?
How many officers would it save if the Cleveland Follies were removed?
I keep hearing lots of hot air but see no action, only another council tax rise to pay for the expensive Cleveland follies.
Can the Echo find out just what each Folly department costs per year, or are Cleveland Police too embarrased to tell the public what its costing?
Estimates being mentioned say that the private helicopter costs £2m and the Donkey squad cost a further £1m in feed and vets.
What are the perks with the new chiefs £140,000 salary? Is another £50,000 private car in the mix?
I wonder if they will give any answers or will it be more spin.
2:22pm Fri 25 Jan 13
stevegg says...
3:55pm Fri 25 Jan 13
st-george1 says...
d people trying to justify what is happening in today’s world and they wonder why mr-and-mrs-public hold them in such contempt … it could be that by the nature of their behaviour, they make it easy !
When some senior officer tells us crime-recording is heavily regulated and frequently audited, something is wrong and we should all be worried because this seems to bear no relationship to REPORTED crimes or the ONS survey of the VICTIMS that suggests that all crime is NOT falling and even saying that the figures may have been exaggerated !
Apparently 10 years ago under the Blair Labour Government, new methods of counting crimes were introduced to sort out INCONSISTENCIES between police forces TO ensure that when a VICTIM reported a crime, it was properly logged and counted …
The rule-changes came about after huge variations were found in crime-reporting-reco
rding rates BUT since 2007 there had been a marked discrepancy that questioned whether the police has become lax OR they were deliberately fiddling the figures …
Question is ... are the police doing more with less or is it simply the affect of the threat of redundancy that improves work-rate and absenteeism or less attention to their second job … one thing that applies to us all is that integrity is non-negotiable.
5:19pm Fri 25 Jan 13
Jonn says...
5:30pm Fri 25 Jan 13
Daza says...
Where I live is becoming like the Wild West by the day!
6:21pm Fri 25 Jan 13
spragger says...
Only good for buying high powered cars and the latest high tech gizmos, at the taxpayers expense, none of which catch criminals.
Look it up .. .