Durham University students on 'Jimmy Savile' themed bar crawl disciplined

6:00am Thursday 22nd November 2012 in News

STUDENTS at one of the country’s leading universities have been disciplined over a Jimmy Savile–themed bar crawl.

The St Cuthbert’s Society Men’s Rugby Club at Durham University reportedly asked first year students to come as young girls, second years as the serial abuser Savile, and third and fourth years as BBC reporters and policemen.

They are said to have visited the student bars of other university colleges during last month’s social night but their behaviour drew complaints and the club has now been banned from playing matches in the university’s inter-college league for the rest of the term.

About 20 students who took part in the event have been fined £50 following a disciplinary investigation by the college authorities and the social secretary and club captain have been required to do 20 hours of community work.

The club, which has A and B teams, appealed against its punishment but the decision was upheld.

Savile, the knighted radio DJ, TV presenter and charity fund-raiser who died aged 84 in October of last year, has been revealed as a paedophile who used the cover of his celebrity to abuse hundreds of youngsters over six decades.

Police believe he could be the country’s most prolific sex offender after an ITV documentary led to a flood of allegations about the now-disgraced celebrity.

A spokesperson for Durham University said: “The university has been made aware of an incident.

“We take such matters very seriously. The students’ college has investigated the incident and disciplinary action is being taken.”

According to the Durham student newspaper Palatinate, the evening started at St Cuthbert’s Society before moving on to other colleges.

Members of the group reportedly tried to take a dartboard from the bar at St Mary’s College , one person stripped naked in the Collingwood College bar and a fire alarm was set off while the party was at Grey College. 

The rugby club could not be contacted for comment by The Northern Echo.

Comments (86)

9:38am Thu 22 Nov 12

loonyleft says...

supposed to be intelligent people,bringing shame on their college.
supposed to be intelligent people,bringing shame on their college. loonyleft

10:21am Thu 22 Nov 12

glyn says...

They were only having a laugh, no one was hurt... ,I know it does nt look good for J.S. (in fact it looks bad) but nothing has been proved.
Where will we draw the line, no more Nov 5th(terrorist).
No more xmas.(Pagan festival.)
No more April fools. (childish)
No more trick/treating. (threatening)
mischief night.(vandalism).
They are students on the final steps to adult hood, if they had dressed as nurses, police or even half naked(normal night out these days they would have been slated.
They were only having a laugh, no one was hurt... ,I know it does nt look good for J.S. (in fact it looks bad) but nothing has been proved. Where will we draw the line, no more Nov 5th(terrorist). No more xmas.(Pagan festival.) No more April fools. (childish) No more trick/treating. (threatening) mischief night.(vandalism). They are students on the final steps to adult hood, if they had dressed as nurses, police or even half naked(normal night out these days they would have been slated. glyn

10:50am Thu 22 Nov 12

frankyboy says...

I agree with you glyn. Such humour doesn't appeal to everyone but if people are now to be punished for having an 'unacceptable' sense of humour, then it's time to worry.
I agree with you glyn. Such humour doesn't appeal to everyone but if people are now to be punished for having an 'unacceptable' sense of humour, then it's time to worry. frankyboy

11:01am Thu 22 Nov 12

loonyleft says...

it was in very bad taste,imagine if you had been the victim of a sex offender in the past,seeing these people on the streets of Durham.
it was in very bad taste,imagine if you had been the victim of a sex offender in the past,seeing these people on the streets of Durham. loonyleft

11:27am Thu 22 Nov 12

Lifetime Townie says...

With minds and sick humour like this it makes us wonder what goes on at the Durham University rugby club? Not the place for the normal persons to be!
With minds and sick humour like this it makes us wonder what goes on at the Durham University rugby club? Not the place for the normal persons to be! Lifetime Townie

11:51am Thu 22 Nov 12

Voice-of-reality says...

It is the same sort of mentality that allows undergraduates at another Bailey College to never have to pass an exam and still be taking taxpayers money after four years... the normal length of the degree in question being three - with said same students having no realistic prospect of ever graduating. (Freedom of Information requests needed). Further, the regulations of the university are very clear - if action brings the university into disrepute or has the potential so to do, the student should be expelled. This would again save the taxpayer money but of course, universities such as Durham seem ever more remote from the concerns of the real world.
It is the same sort of mentality that allows undergraduates at another Bailey College to never have to pass an exam and still be taking taxpayers money after four years... the normal length of the degree in question being three - with said same students having no realistic prospect of ever graduating. (Freedom of Information requests needed). Further, the regulations of the university are very clear - if action brings the university into disrepute or has the potential so to do, the student should be expelled. This would again save the taxpayer money but of course, universities such as Durham seem ever more remote from the concerns of the real world. Voice-of-reality

11:57am Thu 22 Nov 12

glyn says...

Every one has been a victim of something or other whether it is bullying at school, teasing, big nose, little nose, glasses, second hand shoes some form of sexual abuse, mother in law jokes, white jokes, irish jokes, Scottish or black jokes,the list is endless.
Personally there are lots of jokes that I find that could refer to me but life goes on and I am able to laugh at the jokes and myself.
This does not mean that I am heartless or I do not have sympathy for people because they have been a victim. But I do have a sense of humour which unfortunately is not PC these days.
Think of a joke any joke and here will be a "victim"
Every one has been a victim of something or other whether it is bullying at school, teasing, big nose, little nose, glasses, second hand shoes some form of sexual abuse, mother in law jokes, white jokes, irish jokes, Scottish or black jokes,the list is endless. Personally there are lots of jokes that I find that could refer to me but life goes on and I am able to laugh at the jokes and myself. This does not mean that I am heartless or I do not have sympathy for people because they have been a victim. But I do have a sense of humour which unfortunately is not PC these days. Think of a joke any joke and here will be a "victim" glyn

12:04pm Thu 22 Nov 12

diga says...

loonyleft wrote:
it was in very bad taste,imagine if you had been the victim of a sex offender in the past,seeing these people on the streets of Durham.
Exactly!
[quote][p][bold]loonyleft[/bold] wrote: it was in very bad taste,imagine if you had been the victim of a sex offender in the past,seeing these people on the streets of Durham.[/p][/quote]Exactly! diga

12:12pm Thu 22 Nov 12

glyn says...

it was in very bad taste,imagine if you had been the victim of a sex offender in the past,seeing these people on the streets of Durham.
Bit unfair, classing all students as sex offenders, even if they were in fancy dress dressed as students, an ex tv/ radio personality (Against whom allegations have been made) and police...
it was in very bad taste,imagine if you had been the victim of a sex offender in the past,seeing these people on the streets of Durham. Bit unfair, classing all students as sex offenders, even if they were in fancy dress dressed as students, an ex tv/ radio personality (Against whom allegations have been made) and police... glyn

12:13pm Thu 22 Nov 12

glyn says...

it was in very bad taste,imagine if you had been the victim of a sex offender in the past,seeing these people on the streets of Durham.
Bit unfair, classing all students as sex offenders, even if they were in fancy dress dressed as students, an ex tv/ radio personality (Against whom allegations have been made) and police...
it was in very bad taste,imagine if you had been the victim of a sex offender in the past,seeing these people on the streets of Durham. Bit unfair, classing all students as sex offenders, even if they were in fancy dress dressed as students, an ex tv/ radio personality (Against whom allegations have been made) and police... glyn

12:14pm Thu 22 Nov 12

ajtib3 says...

Voice-of-reality wrote:
It is the same sort of mentality that allows undergraduates at another Bailey College to never have to pass an exam and still be taking taxpayers money after four years... the normal length of the degree in question being three - with said same students having no realistic prospect of ever graduating. (Freedom of Information requests needed). Further, the regulations of the university are very clear - if action brings the university into disrepute or has the potential so to do, the student should be expelled. This would again save the taxpayer money but of course, universities such as Durham seem ever more remote from the concerns of the real world.
You obviously have some grudge with Bailey having made this comment before.

However, if people are taking out loans to finance more years of education it is they that potentially lose out, the University that gains and no problem for the taxpayer so I fail to see what your real gripe is!

Only recently Universities were complaining about shortfall in numbers so they will hardly mind.
[quote][p][bold]Voice-of-reality[/bold] wrote: It is the same sort of mentality that allows undergraduates at another Bailey College to never have to pass an exam and still be taking taxpayers money after four years... the normal length of the degree in question being three - with said same students having no realistic prospect of ever graduating. (Freedom of Information requests needed). Further, the regulations of the university are very clear - if action brings the university into disrepute or has the potential so to do, the student should be expelled. This would again save the taxpayer money but of course, universities such as Durham seem ever more remote from the concerns of the real world.[/p][/quote]You obviously have some grudge with Bailey having made this comment before. However, if people are taking out loans to finance more years of education it is they that potentially lose out, the University that gains and no problem for the taxpayer so I fail to see what your real gripe is! Only recently Universities were complaining about shortfall in numbers so they will hardly mind. ajtib3

12:27pm Thu 22 Nov 12

Lnorthcoop says...

This beats Prince Harry's Nazi costume.
This beats Prince Harry's Nazi costume. Lnorthcoop

1:02pm Thu 22 Nov 12

loonyleft says...

Glyn,you are totally missing the point,i never said the students were sex offenders ,that's a really stupid comment and equating peadophilia with bullying at school is nonsensicle i think you need to think more before commenting.
Glyn,you are totally missing the point,i never said the students were sex offenders ,that's a really stupid comment and equating peadophilia with bullying at school is nonsensicle i think you need to think more before commenting. loonyleft

1:16pm Thu 22 Nov 12

frankyboy says...

Bullying at school is worse, people often get hurt.
This was a joke. Like it or not, just a joke.
Bullying at school is worse, people often get hurt. This was a joke. Like it or not, just a joke. frankyboy

1:25pm Thu 22 Nov 12

Height of Sanity says...

Quite funny and orignal for Durham students, who on earth would be offended by this the joke is at the expense of a deceased child molester.
Quite funny and orignal for Durham students, who on earth would be offended by this the joke is at the expense of a deceased child molester. Height of Sanity

1:49pm Thu 22 Nov 12

loonyleft says...

height of sanity. i think you just fell of your perch,if you cannot recognise bad taste you are probably just as bad as those students.
height of sanity. i think you just fell of your perch,if you cannot recognise bad taste you are probably just as bad as those students. loonyleft

2:51pm Thu 22 Nov 12

David Lacey says...

They should be ashamed. Sick minds at work.
They should be ashamed. Sick minds at work. David Lacey

3:27pm Thu 22 Nov 12

Employed Tax Payer, Central Darlo says...

For god's sake, was anybody hurt? No, nobody. If the college wants to punish them it's one thing but the hand wringing on here from some of you is pathetic. They were only costumes!
For god's sake, was anybody hurt? No, nobody. If the college wants to punish them it's one thing but the hand wringing on here from some of you is pathetic. They were only costumes! Employed Tax Payer, Central Darlo

5:39pm Thu 22 Nov 12

loonyleft says...

what is wringing?
what is wringing? loonyleft

5:46pm Thu 22 Nov 12

Longbowman666 says...

Perhaps its time that such 'students' actually got down to getting some work done...but then from what I've witnessed of the Durham Uni students they don't really have to because 'daddy' will get them one!
Perhaps its time that such 'students' actually got down to getting some work done...but then from what I've witnessed of the Durham Uni students they don't really have to because 'daddy' will get them one! Longbowman666

7:26pm Thu 22 Nov 12

glyn says...

There are some old bitter people about who have forgotten how to have a good time.
Did you never do anything risqué/cheeky. Bet you did.
The stududents did no harm.
Lets have a comment from some of the students.
There are some old bitter people about who have forgotten how to have a good time. Did you never do anything risqué/cheeky. Bet you did. The stududents did no harm. Lets have a comment from some of the students. glyn

7:57pm Thu 22 Nov 12

soulsearcher says...

This story did not really shock me.some students are very immature.I would send them back home We don't want most of them here.That why they get hassle off locals.

also back to the js case I thought in the uk you are innocent until proven guilty ?

but this paper says Js is ((revealed as a paedophile))

not sticking up for him but js cant defend himself and in law anyone is innocent until proven guilty

his family could earn big bucks. and sue press students GrowUp
This story did not really shock me.some students are very immature.I would send them back home We don't want most of them here.That why they get hassle off locals. also back to the js case I thought in the uk you are innocent until proven guilty ? but this paper says Js is ((revealed as a paedophile)) not sticking up for him but js cant defend himself and in law anyone is innocent until proven guilty his family could earn big bucks. and sue press students GrowUp soulsearcher

8:42pm Thu 22 Nov 12

Joshua J says...

Voice-of-reality wrote:
It is the same sort of mentality that allows undergraduates at another Bailey College to never have to pass an exam and still be taking taxpayers money after four years... the normal length of the degree in question being three - with said same students having no realistic prospect of ever graduating. (Freedom of Information requests needed). Further, the regulations of the university are very clear - if action brings the university into disrepute or has the potential so to do, the student should be expelled. This would again save the taxpayer money but of course, universities such as Durham seem ever more remote from the concerns of the real world.
Firstly before i begin I don't disagree with their behaviour at all. However, I would like to understand why the behaviour of some students which you clearly disagree with, gives you the right to paint the rest if the Bailey, or indeed Durham University with the same brush. The Bailey for one does not dictate the length of a degree, this is a decision of the University; I would further like to point out that, many students are working two jobs and taking on student loans to put themselves through Univeristy. As for bringing the University into disrepute, judging by the publics opinion on this feed, the majority understand the nature of which the dressing up was intended and that no one was indeed meant to be offended in anyway.

So why not take that chip off your shoulder!
[quote][p][bold]Voice-of-reality[/bold] wrote: It is the same sort of mentality that allows undergraduates at another Bailey College to never have to pass an exam and still be taking taxpayers money after four years... the normal length of the degree in question being three - with said same students having no realistic prospect of ever graduating. (Freedom of Information requests needed). Further, the regulations of the university are very clear - if action brings the university into disrepute or has the potential so to do, the student should be expelled. This would again save the taxpayer money but of course, universities such as Durham seem ever more remote from the concerns of the real world.[/p][/quote]Firstly before i begin I don't disagree with their behaviour at all. However, I would like to understand why the behaviour of some students which you clearly disagree with, gives you the right to paint the rest if the Bailey, or indeed Durham University with the same brush. The Bailey for one does not dictate the length of a degree, this is a decision of the University; I would further like to point out that, many students are working two jobs and taking on student loans to put themselves through Univeristy. As for bringing the University into disrepute, judging by the publics opinion on this feed, the majority understand the nature of which the dressing up was intended and that no one was indeed meant to be offended in anyway. So why not take that chip off your shoulder! Joshua J

8:42pm Thu 22 Nov 12

Joshua J says...

Firstly before i begin I don't disagree with their behaviour at all. However, I would like to understand why the behaviour of some students which you clearly disagree with, gives you the right to paint the rest if the Bailey, or indeed Durham University with the same brush. The Bailey for one does not dictate the length of a degree, this is a decision of the University; I would further like to point out that, many students are working two jobs and taking on student loans to put themselves through Univeristy. As for bringing the University into disrepute, judging by the publics opinion on this feed, the majority understand the nature of which the dressing up was intended and that no one was indeed meant to be offended in anyway.

So why not take that chip off your shoulder!
Firstly before i begin I don't disagree with their behaviour at all. However, I would like to understand why the behaviour of some students which you clearly disagree with, gives you the right to paint the rest if the Bailey, or indeed Durham University with the same brush. The Bailey for one does not dictate the length of a degree, this is a decision of the University; I would further like to point out that, many students are working two jobs and taking on student loans to put themselves through Univeristy. As for bringing the University into disrepute, judging by the publics opinion on this feed, the majority understand the nature of which the dressing up was intended and that no one was indeed meant to be offended in anyway. So why not take that chip off your shoulder! Joshua J

12:50am Fri 23 Nov 12

Employed Tax Payer, Central Darlo says...

loonyleft wrote:
what is wringing?
Try google and learn something.
[quote][p][bold]loonyleft[/bold] wrote: what is wringing?[/p][/quote]Try google and learn something. Employed Tax Payer, Central Darlo

5:15pm Fri 23 Nov 12

always right says...

Its only a bit laugh. Honestly,you Brits are getting as Daft as the yanks by the day.
Its only a bit laugh. Honestly,you Brits are getting as Daft as the yanks by the day. always right

5:15pm Fri 23 Nov 12

always right says...

Its only a bit laugh. Honestly,you Brits are getting as Daft as the yanks by the day.
Its only a bit laugh. Honestly,you Brits are getting as Daft as the yanks by the day. always right

6:18pm Fri 23 Nov 12

loonyleft says...

try using a dictionary,etp
try using a dictionary,etp loonyleft

6:18pm Fri 23 Nov 12

loonyleft says...

try using a dictionary,etp
try using a dictionary,etp loonyleft

6:21pm Fri 23 Nov 12

loonyleft says...

always wrong,only a laugh,wasn't that Jimmy Saviles excuse?
always wrong,only a laugh,wasn't that Jimmy Saviles excuse? loonyleft

6:21pm Fri 23 Nov 12

loonyleft says...

always wrong,only a laugh,wasn't that Jimmy Saviles excuse?
always wrong,only a laugh,wasn't that Jimmy Saviles excuse? loonyleft

10:09pm Fri 23 Nov 12

Scotchcorner says...

The authorities at Durham University seem to have had a sense of humour bypass. Personally, I find it hilarious and before anyone starts that "what if Jimmy molested you ........." nonsense, you cant ban everything that doesnt quite tickle your fancy. Lots of comedy is cruel and lacks taste, thats what makes us laugh.
The authorities at Durham University seem to have had a sense of humour bypass. Personally, I find it hilarious and before anyone starts that "what if Jimmy molested you ........." nonsense, you cant ban everything that doesnt quite tickle your fancy. Lots of comedy is cruel and lacks taste, thats what makes us laugh. Scotchcorner

11:05am Sat 24 Nov 12

Adam Walker says...

Loonyleft.... you commented "it was in very bad taste, imagine if you had been the victim of a sex offender in the past, seeing these people on the streets of Durham".
I should imagine that our children, who are groomed, drugged and gang raped by Muslim paedophiles have similar feelings every time they see a Muslim man. Fortunately for those you mention Savile is dead, unlike the growing problem of Muslim paedophile gangs, which grows bigger with each passing day as the problem is brushed under the carpet up and down the country.
Loonyleft.... you commented "it was in very bad taste, imagine if you had been the victim of a sex offender in the past, seeing these people on the streets of Durham". I should imagine that our children, who are groomed, drugged and gang raped by Muslim paedophiles have similar feelings every time they see a Muslim man. Fortunately for those you mention Savile is dead, unlike the growing problem of Muslim paedophile gangs, which grows bigger with each passing day as the problem is brushed under the carpet up and down the country. Adam Walker

12:14pm Sat 24 Nov 12

always right says...

loonyleft wrote:
always wrong,only a laugh,wasn't that Jimmy Saviles excuse?
I dont recall anything being proved yet !. Looks like your just another one of them that believe anything you read. You must try and get out more !!.
[quote][p][bold]loonyleft[/bold] wrote: always wrong,only a laugh,wasn't that Jimmy Saviles excuse?[/p][/quote]I dont recall anything being proved yet !. Looks like your just another one of them that believe anything you read. You must try and get out more !!. always right

3:18pm Sat 24 Nov 12

RobAycliffe says...

loonyleft wrote:
what is wringing?
Seriously?
[quote][p][bold]loonyleft[/bold] wrote: what is wringing?[/p][/quote]Seriously? RobAycliffe

3:58pm Sat 24 Nov 12

greenfinger says...

loads of bs. it's not a free country anymore. i agree it was tasteless but what have they done wrong?. id not be paying the £50 fine or doing any unpaid work. simples
loads of bs. it's not a free country anymore. i agree it was tasteless but what have they done wrong?. id not be paying the £50 fine or doing any unpaid work. simples greenfinger

5:36pm Sat 24 Nov 12

loonyleft says...

hello Adam crawled from under your stone again,is the dark man frightening you again? how many immigrants are infesting Tudhoe these days, move to the midlands and make your self popular they will just love you.
hello Adam crawled from under your stone again,is the dark man frightening you again? how many immigrants are infesting Tudhoe these days, move to the midlands and make your self popular they will just love you. loonyleft

8:22pm Sat 24 Nov 12

Adam Walker says...

Wonder why the comments on more multicultural enrichment have been removed? http://www.thenorthe
rnecho.co.uk/news/10
069308.Carwash_kingp
in_jailed_over_plan_
to_flood_North_East_
with_heroin/
How can we celebrate the failed experiment and feel truly enriched if we are not allowed a voice on such matters?
Wonder why the comments on more multicultural enrichment have been removed? http://www.thenorthe rnecho.co.uk/news/10 069308.Carwash_kingp in_jailed_over_plan_ to_flood_North_East_ with_heroin/ How can we celebrate the failed experiment and feel truly enriched if we are not allowed a voice on such matters? Adam Walker

8:25pm Sat 24 Nov 12

loonyleft says...

because your a mad nazi Adam thats why.
because your a mad nazi Adam thats why. loonyleft

8:30pm Sat 24 Nov 12

loonyleft says...

Jjimmy Savile must have had a lot of enemies if he is innocent!!!
Jjimmy Savile must have had a lot of enemies if he is innocent!!! loonyleft

9:45pm Sat 24 Nov 12

Adam Walker says...

A little bit of reading to educate the pork out there hiding amongst us.....

http://www.bnp.org.u
k/news/national/libe
ralmarxist-fascism-a
nd-totalitarianism-%
E2%80%93-explanation


Oh sorry, educating pork is an impossibility. Still worth a read for anyone interested in what is really going on, however.
A little bit of reading to educate the pork out there hiding amongst us..... http://www.bnp.org.u k/news/national/libe ralmarxist-fascism-a nd-totalitarianism-% E2%80%93-explanation Oh sorry, educating pork is an impossibility. Still worth a read for anyone interested in what is really going on, however. Adam Walker

10:59am Sun 25 Nov 12

loonyleft says...

wtf are you talking about adam,watch out or i'll set the muslim brotherhood on you.
wtf are you talking about adam,watch out or i'll set the muslim brotherhood on you. loonyleft

1:33pm Sun 25 Nov 12

JuiceTerry says...

Adam Walker wrote:
Loonyleft.... you commented "it was in very bad taste, imagine if you had been the victim of a sex offender in the past, seeing these people on the streets of Durham".
I should imagine that our children, who are groomed, drugged and gang raped by Muslim paedophiles have similar feelings every time they see a Muslim man. Fortunately for those you mention Savile is dead, unlike the growing problem of Muslim paedophile gangs, which grows bigger with each passing day as the problem is brushed under the carpet up and down the country.
That'll be those Muslmic Ray Guns then.

http://www.youtube.c
om/watch?v=AIPD8qHht
VU
[quote][p][bold]Adam Walker[/bold] wrote: Loonyleft.... you commented "it was in very bad taste, imagine if you had been the victim of a sex offender in the past, seeing these people on the streets of Durham". I should imagine that our children, who are groomed, drugged and gang raped by Muslim paedophiles have similar feelings every time they see a Muslim man. Fortunately for those you mention Savile is dead, unlike the growing problem of Muslim paedophile gangs, which grows bigger with each passing day as the problem is brushed under the carpet up and down the country.[/p][/quote]That'll be those Muslmic Ray Guns then. http://www.youtube.c om/watch?v=AIPD8qHht VU JuiceTerry

1:34pm Sun 25 Nov 12

JuiceTerry says...

soulsearcher wrote:
This story did not really shock me.some students are very immature.I would send them back home We don't want most of them here.That why they get hassle off locals.

also back to the js case I thought in the uk you are innocent until proven guilty ?

but this paper says Js is ((revealed as a paedophile))

not sticking up for him but js cant defend himself and in law anyone is innocent until proven guilty

his family could earn big bucks. and sue press students GrowUp
You can't defame the dead. Next well thought out suggestion?
[quote][p][bold]soulsearcher[/bold] wrote: This story did not really shock me.some students are very immature.I would send them back home We don't want most of them here.That why they get hassle off locals. also back to the js case I thought in the uk you are innocent until proven guilty ? but this paper says Js is ((revealed as a paedophile)) not sticking up for him but js cant defend himself and in law anyone is innocent until proven guilty his family could earn big bucks. and sue press students GrowUp[/p][/quote]You can't defame the dead. Next well thought out suggestion? JuiceTerry

2:05pm Mon 26 Nov 12

AMB2nd says...

I love reading the comments people leave on this website. They're usually far more interesting that the story itself, and really brighten up my desk-bound lunchtime.
Keep up the good work Northern Echo readers!
Thank you
I love reading the comments people leave on this website. They're usually far more interesting that the story itself, and really brighten up my desk-bound lunchtime. Keep up the good work Northern Echo readers! Thank you AMB2nd

6:32pm Mon 26 Nov 12

the-big-yin says...

always right wrote:
Its only a bit laugh. Honestly,you Brits are getting as Daft as the yanks by the day.
well said....people dress up as hitler, gary glitter. pol pot, saddam hussein, osama bin laden, and wow even winston churchill ....whats the problem people should accept it for what it would have been....a **** take.....
yes he was a dirty perverted t.w.a.t......but life moves on......students are students...also have all commenting on here never done something like that before....i guess you have......its a joke.......
[quote][p][bold]always right[/bold] wrote: Its only a bit laugh. Honestly,you Brits are getting as Daft as the yanks by the day.[/p][/quote]well said....people dress up as hitler, gary glitter. pol pot, saddam hussein, osama bin laden, and wow even winston churchill ....whats the problem people should accept it for what it would have been....a **** take..... yes he was a dirty perverted t.w.a.t......but life moves on......students are students...also have all commenting on here never done something like that before....i guess you have......its a joke....... the-big-yin

7:19am Wed 28 Nov 12

snudge says...

A few lads having fun. Get a life you leftie socialist do gooders.Sack the lot of you and all you social workers and good for nothing councillors with your snouts in the trough .Bring on the uprising of the people.
A few lads having fun. Get a life you leftie socialist do gooders.Sack the lot of you and all you social workers and good for nothing councillors with your snouts in the trough .Bring on the uprising of the people. snudge

10:45am Wed 28 Nov 12

loonyleft says...

social workers get wrong for stepping in, they get wrong for not doing any thing, and also you think it wrong to care about peoples feelings-strange man.
social workers get wrong for stepping in, they get wrong for not doing any thing, and also you think it wrong to care about peoples feelings-strange man. loonyleft

3:03pm Wed 28 Nov 12

doonhamer says...

Height of Sanity wrote:
Quite funny and orignal for Durham students, who on earth would be offended by this the joke is at the expense of a deceased child molester.
Surely you should use the word "alleged", police evidence is one thing (remember the lies about Hillsborough) but Jimmy Saville, until proven guilty in a court of law, is to all intents and purposes, innocent. People like you would burn so called witches, 300 years ago, it's so easy to jump on the bandwaggon of mass hysteria. Saville, unlike McAlpine, is no longer with us. People like you soon changed their minds about him did they not ??. Wally.
[quote][p][bold]Height of Sanity[/bold] wrote: Quite funny and orignal for Durham students, who on earth would be offended by this the joke is at the expense of a deceased child molester.[/p][/quote]Surely you should use the word "alleged", police evidence is one thing (remember the lies about Hillsborough) but Jimmy Saville, until proven guilty in a court of law, is to all intents and purposes, innocent. People like you would burn so called witches, 300 years ago, it's so easy to jump on the bandwaggon of mass hysteria. Saville, unlike McAlpine, is no longer with us. People like you soon changed their minds about him did they not ??. Wally. doonhamer

3:03pm Wed 28 Nov 12

doonhamer says...

Height of Sanity wrote:
Quite funny and orignal for Durham students, who on earth would be offended by this the joke is at the expense of a deceased child molester.
Surely you should use the word "alleged", police evidence is one thing (remember the lies about Hillsborough) but Jimmy Saville, until proven guilty in a court of law, is to all intents and purposes, innocent. People like you would burn so called witches, 300 years ago, it's so easy to jump on the bandwaggon of mass hysteria. Saville, unlike McAlpine, is no longer with us. People like you soon changed their minds about him did they not ??. Wally.
[quote][p][bold]Height of Sanity[/bold] wrote: Quite funny and orignal for Durham students, who on earth would be offended by this the joke is at the expense of a deceased child molester.[/p][/quote]Surely you should use the word "alleged", police evidence is one thing (remember the lies about Hillsborough) but Jimmy Saville, until proven guilty in a court of law, is to all intents and purposes, innocent. People like you would burn so called witches, 300 years ago, it's so easy to jump on the bandwaggon of mass hysteria. Saville, unlike McAlpine, is no longer with us. People like you soon changed their minds about him did they not ??. Wally. doonhamer

3:03pm Wed 28 Nov 12

doonhamer says...

Height of Sanity wrote:
Quite funny and orignal for Durham students, who on earth would be offended by this the joke is at the expense of a deceased child molester.
Surely you should use the word "alleged", police evidence is one thing (remember the lies about Hillsborough) but Jimmy Saville, until proven guilty in a court of law, is to all intents and purposes, innocent. People like you would burn so called witches, 300 years ago, it's so easy to jump on the bandwaggon of mass hysteria. Saville, unlike McAlpine, is no longer with us. People like you soon changed their minds about him did they not ??. Wally.
[quote][p][bold]Height of Sanity[/bold] wrote: Quite funny and orignal for Durham students, who on earth would be offended by this the joke is at the expense of a deceased child molester.[/p][/quote]Surely you should use the word "alleged", police evidence is one thing (remember the lies about Hillsborough) but Jimmy Saville, until proven guilty in a court of law, is to all intents and purposes, innocent. People like you would burn so called witches, 300 years ago, it's so easy to jump on the bandwaggon of mass hysteria. Saville, unlike McAlpine, is no longer with us. People like you soon changed their minds about him did they not ??. Wally. doonhamer

3:03pm Wed 28 Nov 12

doonhamer says...

Height of Sanity wrote:
Quite funny and orignal for Durham students, who on earth would be offended by this the joke is at the expense of a deceased child molester.
Surely you should use the word "alleged", police evidence is one thing (remember the lies about Hillsborough) but Jimmy Saville, until proven guilty in a court of law, is to all intents and purposes, innocent. People like you would burn so called witches, 300 years ago, it's so easy to jump on the bandwaggon of mass hysteria. Saville, unlike McAlpine, is no longer with us. People like you soon changed their minds about him did they not ??. Wally.
[quote][p][bold]Height of Sanity[/bold] wrote: Quite funny and orignal for Durham students, who on earth would be offended by this the joke is at the expense of a deceased child molester.[/p][/quote]Surely you should use the word "alleged", police evidence is one thing (remember the lies about Hillsborough) but Jimmy Saville, until proven guilty in a court of law, is to all intents and purposes, innocent. People like you would burn so called witches, 300 years ago, it's so easy to jump on the bandwaggon of mass hysteria. Saville, unlike McAlpine, is no longer with us. People like you soon changed their minds about him did they not ??. Wally. doonhamer

3:03pm Wed 28 Nov 12

doonhamer says...

Height of Sanity wrote:
Quite funny and orignal for Durham students, who on earth would be offended by this the joke is at the expense of a deceased child molester.
Surely you should use the word "alleged", police evidence is one thing (remember the lies about Hillsborough) but Jimmy Saville, until proven guilty in a court of law, is to all intents and purposes, innocent. People like you would burn so called witches, 300 years ago, it's so easy to jump on the bandwaggon of mass hysteria. Saville, unlike McAlpine, is no longer with us. People like you soon changed their minds about him did they not ??. Wally.
[quote][p][bold]Height of Sanity[/bold] wrote: Quite funny and orignal for Durham students, who on earth would be offended by this the joke is at the expense of a deceased child molester.[/p][/quote]Surely you should use the word "alleged", police evidence is one thing (remember the lies about Hillsborough) but Jimmy Saville, until proven guilty in a court of law, is to all intents and purposes, innocent. People like you would burn so called witches, 300 years ago, it's so easy to jump on the bandwaggon of mass hysteria. Saville, unlike McAlpine, is no longer with us. People like you soon changed their minds about him did they not ??. Wally. doonhamer

3:03pm Wed 28 Nov 12

doonhamer says...

Height of Sanity wrote:
Quite funny and orignal for Durham students, who on earth would be offended by this the joke is at the expense of a deceased child molester.
Surely you should use the word "alleged", police evidence is one thing (remember the lies about Hillsborough) but Jimmy Saville, until proven guilty in a court of law, is to all intents and purposes, innocent. People like you would burn so called witches, 300 years ago, it's so easy to jump on the bandwaggon of mass hysteria. Saville, unlike McAlpine, is no longer with us. People like you soon changed their minds about him did they not ??. Wally.
[quote][p][bold]Height of Sanity[/bold] wrote: Quite funny and orignal for Durham students, who on earth would be offended by this the joke is at the expense of a deceased child molester.[/p][/quote]Surely you should use the word "alleged", police evidence is one thing (remember the lies about Hillsborough) but Jimmy Saville, until proven guilty in a court of law, is to all intents and purposes, innocent. People like you would burn so called witches, 300 years ago, it's so easy to jump on the bandwaggon of mass hysteria. Saville, unlike McAlpine, is no longer with us. People like you soon changed their minds about him did they not ??. Wally. doonhamer

3:03pm Wed 28 Nov 12

doonhamer says...

Height of Sanity wrote:
Quite funny and orignal for Durham students, who on earth would be offended by this the joke is at the expense of a deceased child molester.
Surely you should use the word "alleged", police evidence is one thing (remember the lies about Hillsborough) but Jimmy Saville, until proven guilty in a court of law, is to all intents and purposes, innocent. People like you would burn so called witches, 300 years ago, it's so easy to jump on the bandwaggon of mass hysteria. Saville, unlike McAlpine, is no longer with us. People like you soon changed their minds about him did they not ??. Wally.
[quote][p][bold]Height of Sanity[/bold] wrote: Quite funny and orignal for Durham students, who on earth would be offended by this the joke is at the expense of a deceased child molester.[/p][/quote]Surely you should use the word "alleged", police evidence is one thing (remember the lies about Hillsborough) but Jimmy Saville, until proven guilty in a court of law, is to all intents and purposes, innocent. People like you would burn so called witches, 300 years ago, it's so easy to jump on the bandwaggon of mass hysteria. Saville, unlike McAlpine, is no longer with us. People like you soon changed their minds about him did they not ??. Wally. doonhamer

3:03pm Wed 28 Nov 12

doonhamer says...

Height of Sanity wrote:
Quite funny and orignal for Durham students, who on earth would be offended by this the joke is at the expense of a deceased child molester.
Surely you should use the word "alleged", police evidence is one thing (remember the lies about Hillsborough) but Jimmy Saville, until proven guilty in a court of law, is to all intents and purposes, innocent. People like you would burn so called witches, 300 years ago, it's so easy to jump on the bandwaggon of mass hysteria. Saville, unlike McAlpine, is no longer with us. People like you soon changed their minds about him did they not ??. Wally.
[quote][p][bold]Height of Sanity[/bold] wrote: Quite funny and orignal for Durham students, who on earth would be offended by this the joke is at the expense of a deceased child molester.[/p][/quote]Surely you should use the word "alleged", police evidence is one thing (remember the lies about Hillsborough) but Jimmy Saville, until proven guilty in a court of law, is to all intents and purposes, innocent. People like you would burn so called witches, 300 years ago, it's so easy to jump on the bandwaggon of mass hysteria. Saville, unlike McAlpine, is no longer with us. People like you soon changed their minds about him did they not ??. Wally. doonhamer

3:03pm Wed 28 Nov 12

doonhamer says...

Height of Sanity wrote:
Quite funny and orignal for Durham students, who on earth would be offended by this the joke is at the expense of a deceased child molester.
Surely you should use the word "alleged", police evidence is one thing (remember the lies about Hillsborough) but Jimmy Saville, until proven guilty in a court of law, is to all intents and purposes, innocent. People like you would burn so called witches, 300 years ago, it's so easy to jump on the bandwaggon of mass hysteria. Saville, unlike McAlpine, is no longer with us. People like you soon changed their minds about him did they not ??. Wally.
[quote][p][bold]Height of Sanity[/bold] wrote: Quite funny and orignal for Durham students, who on earth would be offended by this the joke is at the expense of a deceased child molester.[/p][/quote]Surely you should use the word "alleged", police evidence is one thing (remember the lies about Hillsborough) but Jimmy Saville, until proven guilty in a court of law, is to all intents and purposes, innocent. People like you would burn so called witches, 300 years ago, it's so easy to jump on the bandwaggon of mass hysteria. Saville, unlike McAlpine, is no longer with us. People like you soon changed their minds about him did they not ??. Wally. doonhamer

3:03pm Wed 28 Nov 12

doonhamer says...

Height of Sanity wrote:
Quite funny and orignal for Durham students, who on earth would be offended by this the joke is at the expense of a deceased child molester.
Surely you should use the word "alleged", police evidence is one thing (remember the lies about Hillsborough) but Jimmy Saville, until proven guilty in a court of law, is to all intents and purposes, innocent. People like you would burn so called witches, 300 years ago, it's so easy to jump on the bandwaggon of mass hysteria. Saville, unlike McAlpine, is no longer with us. People like you soon changed their minds about him did they not ??. Wally.
[quote][p][bold]Height of Sanity[/bold] wrote: Quite funny and orignal for Durham students, who on earth would be offended by this the joke is at the expense of a deceased child molester.[/p][/quote]Surely you should use the word "alleged", police evidence is one thing (remember the lies about Hillsborough) but Jimmy Saville, until proven guilty in a court of law, is to all intents and purposes, innocent. People like you would burn so called witches, 300 years ago, it's so easy to jump on the bandwaggon of mass hysteria. Saville, unlike McAlpine, is no longer with us. People like you soon changed their minds about him did they not ??. Wally. doonhamer

3:03pm Wed 28 Nov 12

doonhamer says...

Height of Sanity wrote:
Quite funny and orignal for Durham students, who on earth would be offended by this the joke is at the expense of a deceased child molester.
Surely you should use the word "alleged", police evidence is one thing (remember the lies about Hillsborough) but Jimmy Saville, until proven guilty in a court of law, is to all intents and purposes, innocent. People like you would burn so called witches, 300 years ago, it's so easy to jump on the bandwaggon of mass hysteria. Saville, unlike McAlpine, is no longer with us. People like you soon changed their minds about him did they not ??. Wally.
[quote][p][bold]Height of Sanity[/bold] wrote: Quite funny and orignal for Durham students, who on earth would be offended by this the joke is at the expense of a deceased child molester.[/p][/quote]Surely you should use the word "alleged", police evidence is one thing (remember the lies about Hillsborough) but Jimmy Saville, until proven guilty in a court of law, is to all intents and purposes, innocent. People like you would burn so called witches, 300 years ago, it's so easy to jump on the bandwaggon of mass hysteria. Saville, unlike McAlpine, is no longer with us. People like you soon changed their minds about him did they not ??. Wally. doonhamer

3:03pm Wed 28 Nov 12

doonhamer says...

Height of Sanity wrote:
Quite funny and orignal for Durham students, who on earth would be offended by this the joke is at the expense of a deceased child molester.
Surely you should use the word "alleged", police evidence is one thing (remember the lies about Hillsborough) but Jimmy Saville, until proven guilty in a court of law, is to all intents and purposes, innocent. People like you would burn so called witches, 300 years ago, it's so easy to jump on the bandwaggon of mass hysteria. Saville, unlike McAlpine, is no longer with us. People like you soon changed their minds about him did they not ??. Wally.
[quote][p][bold]Height of Sanity[/bold] wrote: Quite funny and orignal for Durham students, who on earth would be offended by this the joke is at the expense of a deceased child molester.[/p][/quote]Surely you should use the word "alleged", police evidence is one thing (remember the lies about Hillsborough) but Jimmy Saville, until proven guilty in a court of law, is to all intents and purposes, innocent. People like you would burn so called witches, 300 years ago, it's so easy to jump on the bandwaggon of mass hysteria. Saville, unlike McAlpine, is no longer with us. People like you soon changed their minds about him did they not ??. Wally. doonhamer

3:03pm Wed 28 Nov 12

doonhamer says...

Height of Sanity wrote:
Quite funny and orignal for Durham students, who on earth would be offended by this the joke is at the expense of a deceased child molester.
Surely you should use the word "alleged", police evidence is one thing (remember the lies about Hillsborough) but Jimmy Saville, until proven guilty in a court of law, is to all intents and purposes, innocent. People like you would burn so called witches, 300 years ago, it's so easy to jump on the bandwaggon of mass hysteria. Saville, unlike McAlpine, is no longer with us. People like you soon changed their minds about him did they not ??. Wally.
[quote][p][bold]Height of Sanity[/bold] wrote: Quite funny and orignal for Durham students, who on earth would be offended by this the joke is at the expense of a deceased child molester.[/p][/quote]Surely you should use the word "alleged", police evidence is one thing (remember the lies about Hillsborough) but Jimmy Saville, until proven guilty in a court of law, is to all intents and purposes, innocent. People like you would burn so called witches, 300 years ago, it's so easy to jump on the bandwaggon of mass hysteria. Saville, unlike McAlpine, is no longer with us. People like you soon changed their minds about him did they not ??. Wally. doonhamer

3:03pm Wed 28 Nov 12

doonhamer says...

Height of Sanity wrote:
Quite funny and orignal for Durham students, who on earth would be offended by this the joke is at the expense of a deceased child molester.
Surely you should use the word "alleged", police evidence is one thing (remember the lies about Hillsborough) but Jimmy Saville, until proven guilty in a court of law, is to all intents and purposes, innocent. People like you would burn so called witches, 300 years ago, it's so easy to jump on the bandwaggon of mass hysteria. Saville, unlike McAlpine, is no longer with us. People like you soon changed their minds about him did they not ??. Wally.
[quote][p][bold]Height of Sanity[/bold] wrote: Quite funny and orignal for Durham students, who on earth would be offended by this the joke is at the expense of a deceased child molester.[/p][/quote]Surely you should use the word "alleged", police evidence is one thing (remember the lies about Hillsborough) but Jimmy Saville, until proven guilty in a court of law, is to all intents and purposes, innocent. People like you would burn so called witches, 300 years ago, it's so easy to jump on the bandwaggon of mass hysteria. Saville, unlike McAlpine, is no longer with us. People like you soon changed their minds about him did they not ??. Wally. doonhamer

3:03pm Wed 28 Nov 12

doonhamer says...

Height of Sanity wrote:
Quite funny and orignal for Durham students, who on earth would be offended by this the joke is at the expense of a deceased child molester.
Surely you should use the word "alleged", police evidence is one thing (remember the lies about Hillsborough) but Jimmy Saville, until proven guilty in a court of law, is to all intents and purposes, innocent. People like you would burn so called witches, 300 years ago, it's so easy to jump on the bandwaggon of mass hysteria. Saville, unlike McAlpine, is no longer with us. People like you soon changed their minds about him did they not ??. Wally.
[quote][p][bold]Height of Sanity[/bold] wrote: Quite funny and orignal for Durham students, who on earth would be offended by this the joke is at the expense of a deceased child molester.[/p][/quote]Surely you should use the word "alleged", police evidence is one thing (remember the lies about Hillsborough) but Jimmy Saville, until proven guilty in a court of law, is to all intents and purposes, innocent. People like you would burn so called witches, 300 years ago, it's so easy to jump on the bandwaggon of mass hysteria. Saville, unlike McAlpine, is no longer with us. People like you soon changed their minds about him did they not ??. Wally. doonhamer

3:03pm Wed 28 Nov 12

doonhamer says...

Height of Sanity wrote:
Quite funny and orignal for Durham students, who on earth would be offended by this the joke is at the expense of a deceased child molester.
Surely you should use the word "alleged", police evidence is one thing (remember the lies about Hillsborough) but Jimmy Saville, until proven guilty in a court of law, is to all intents and purposes, innocent. People like you would burn so called witches, 300 years ago, it's so easy to jump on the bandwaggon of mass hysteria. Saville, unlike McAlpine, is no longer with us. People like you soon changed their minds about him did they not ??. Wally.
[quote][p][bold]Height of Sanity[/bold] wrote: Quite funny and orignal for Durham students, who on earth would be offended by this the joke is at the expense of a deceased child molester.[/p][/quote]Surely you should use the word "alleged", police evidence is one thing (remember the lies about Hillsborough) but Jimmy Saville, until proven guilty in a court of law, is to all intents and purposes, innocent. People like you would burn so called witches, 300 years ago, it's so easy to jump on the bandwaggon of mass hysteria. Saville, unlike McAlpine, is no longer with us. People like you soon changed their minds about him did they not ??. Wally. doonhamer

3:03pm Wed 28 Nov 12

doonhamer says...

Height of Sanity wrote:
Quite funny and orignal for Durham students, who on earth would be offended by this the joke is at the expense of a deceased child molester.
Surely you should use the word "alleged", police evidence is one thing (remember the lies about Hillsborough) but Jimmy Saville, until proven guilty in a court of law, is to all intents and purposes, innocent. People like you would burn so called witches, 300 years ago, it's so easy to jump on the bandwaggon of mass hysteria. Saville, unlike McAlpine, is no longer with us. People like you soon changed their minds about him did they not ??. Wally.
[quote][p][bold]Height of Sanity[/bold] wrote: Quite funny and orignal for Durham students, who on earth would be offended by this the joke is at the expense of a deceased child molester.[/p][/quote]Surely you should use the word "alleged", police evidence is one thing (remember the lies about Hillsborough) but Jimmy Saville, until proven guilty in a court of law, is to all intents and purposes, innocent. People like you would burn so called witches, 300 years ago, it's so easy to jump on the bandwaggon of mass hysteria. Saville, unlike McAlpine, is no longer with us. People like you soon changed their minds about him did they not ??. Wally. doonhamer

3:04pm Wed 28 Nov 12

doonhamer says...

Height of Sanity wrote:
Quite funny and orignal for Durham students, who on earth would be offended by this the joke is at the expense of a deceased child molester.
Surely you should use the word "alleged", police evidence is one thing (remember the lies about Hillsborough) but Jimmy Saville, until proven guilty in a court of law, is to all intents and purposes, innocent. People like you would burn so called witches, 300 years ago, it's so easy to jump on the bandwaggon of mass hysteria. Saville, unlike McAlpine, is no longer with us. People like you soon changed their minds about him did they not ??. Wally.
[quote][p][bold]Height of Sanity[/bold] wrote: Quite funny and orignal for Durham students, who on earth would be offended by this the joke is at the expense of a deceased child molester.[/p][/quote]Surely you should use the word "alleged", police evidence is one thing (remember the lies about Hillsborough) but Jimmy Saville, until proven guilty in a court of law, is to all intents and purposes, innocent. People like you would burn so called witches, 300 years ago, it's so easy to jump on the bandwaggon of mass hysteria. Saville, unlike McAlpine, is no longer with us. People like you soon changed their minds about him did they not ??. Wally. doonhamer

3:04pm Wed 28 Nov 12

doonhamer says...

Height of Sanity wrote:
Quite funny and orignal for Durham students, who on earth would be offended by this the joke is at the expense of a deceased child molester.
Surely you should use the word "alleged", police evidence is one thing (remember the lies about Hillsborough) but Jimmy Saville, until proven guilty in a court of law, is to all intents and purposes, innocent. People like you would burn so called witches, 300 years ago, it's so easy to jump on the bandwaggon of mass hysteria. Saville, unlike McAlpine, is no longer with us. People like you soon changed their minds about him did they not ??. Wally.
[quote][p][bold]Height of Sanity[/bold] wrote: Quite funny and orignal for Durham students, who on earth would be offended by this the joke is at the expense of a deceased child molester.[/p][/quote]Surely you should use the word "alleged", police evidence is one thing (remember the lies about Hillsborough) but Jimmy Saville, until proven guilty in a court of law, is to all intents and purposes, innocent. People like you would burn so called witches, 300 years ago, it's so easy to jump on the bandwaggon of mass hysteria. Saville, unlike McAlpine, is no longer with us. People like you soon changed their minds about him did they not ??. Wally. doonhamer

3:04pm Wed 28 Nov 12

doonhamer says...

Height of Sanity wrote:
Quite funny and orignal for Durham students, who on earth would be offended by this the joke is at the expense of a deceased child molester.
Surely you should use the word "alleged", police evidence is one thing (remember the lies about Hillsborough) but Jimmy Saville, until proven guilty in a court of law, is to all intents and purposes, innocent. People like you would burn so called witches, 300 years ago, it's so easy to jump on the bandwaggon of mass hysteria. Saville, unlike McAlpine, is no longer with us. People like you soon changed their minds about him did they not ??. Wally.
[quote][p][bold]Height of Sanity[/bold] wrote: Quite funny and orignal for Durham students, who on earth would be offended by this the joke is at the expense of a deceased child molester.[/p][/quote]Surely you should use the word "alleged", police evidence is one thing (remember the lies about Hillsborough) but Jimmy Saville, until proven guilty in a court of law, is to all intents and purposes, innocent. People like you would burn so called witches, 300 years ago, it's so easy to jump on the bandwaggon of mass hysteria. Saville, unlike McAlpine, is no longer with us. People like you soon changed their minds about him did they not ??. Wally. doonhamer

3:04pm Wed 28 Nov 12

doonhamer says...

Height of Sanity wrote:
Quite funny and orignal for Durham students, who on earth would be offended by this the joke is at the expense of a deceased child molester.
Surely you should use the word "alleged", police evidence is one thing (remember the lies about Hillsborough) but Jimmy Saville, until proven guilty in a court of law, is to all intents and purposes, innocent. People like you would burn so called witches, 300 years ago, it's so easy to jump on the bandwaggon of mass hysteria. Saville, unlike McAlpine, is no longer with us. People like you soon changed their minds about him did they not ??. Wally.
[quote][p][bold]Height of Sanity[/bold] wrote: Quite funny and orignal for Durham students, who on earth would be offended by this the joke is at the expense of a deceased child molester.[/p][/quote]Surely you should use the word "alleged", police evidence is one thing (remember the lies about Hillsborough) but Jimmy Saville, until proven guilty in a court of law, is to all intents and purposes, innocent. People like you would burn so called witches, 300 years ago, it's so easy to jump on the bandwaggon of mass hysteria. Saville, unlike McAlpine, is no longer with us. People like you soon changed their minds about him did they not ??. Wally. doonhamer

3:04pm Wed 28 Nov 12

doonhamer says...

Height of Sanity wrote:
Quite funny and orignal for Durham students, who on earth would be offended by this the joke is at the expense of a deceased child molester.
Surely you should use the word "alleged", police evidence is one thing (remember the lies about Hillsborough) but Jimmy Saville, until proven guilty in a court of law, is to all intents and purposes, innocent. People like you would burn so called witches, 300 years ago, it's so easy to jump on the bandwaggon of mass hysteria. Saville, unlike McAlpine, is no longer with us. People like you soon changed their minds about him did they not ??. Wally.
[quote][p][bold]Height of Sanity[/bold] wrote: Quite funny and orignal for Durham students, who on earth would be offended by this the joke is at the expense of a deceased child molester.[/p][/quote]Surely you should use the word "alleged", police evidence is one thing (remember the lies about Hillsborough) but Jimmy Saville, until proven guilty in a court of law, is to all intents and purposes, innocent. People like you would burn so called witches, 300 years ago, it's so easy to jump on the bandwaggon of mass hysteria. Saville, unlike McAlpine, is no longer with us. People like you soon changed their minds about him did they not ??. Wally. doonhamer

3:04pm Wed 28 Nov 12

doonhamer says...

Height of Sanity wrote:
Quite funny and orignal for Durham students, who on earth would be offended by this the joke is at the expense of a deceased child molester.
Surely you should use the word "alleged", police evidence is one thing (remember the lies about Hillsborough) but Jimmy Saville, until proven guilty in a court of law, is to all intents and purposes, innocent. People like you would burn so called witches, 300 years ago, it's so easy to jump on the bandwaggon of mass hysteria. Saville, unlike McAlpine, is no longer with us. People like you soon changed their minds about him did they not ??. Wally.
[quote][p][bold]Height of Sanity[/bold] wrote: Quite funny and orignal for Durham students, who on earth would be offended by this the joke is at the expense of a deceased child molester.[/p][/quote]Surely you should use the word "alleged", police evidence is one thing (remember the lies about Hillsborough) but Jimmy Saville, until proven guilty in a court of law, is to all intents and purposes, innocent. People like you would burn so called witches, 300 years ago, it's so easy to jump on the bandwaggon of mass hysteria. Saville, unlike McAlpine, is no longer with us. People like you soon changed their minds about him did they not ??. Wally. doonhamer

3:04pm Wed 28 Nov 12

doonhamer says...

Height of Sanity wrote:
Quite funny and orignal for Durham students, who on earth would be offended by this the joke is at the expense of a deceased child molester.
Surely you should use the word "alleged", police evidence is one thing (remember the lies about Hillsborough) but Jimmy Saville, until proven guilty in a court of law, is to all intents and purposes, innocent. People like you would burn so called witches, 300 years ago, it's so easy to jump on the bandwaggon of mass hysteria. Saville, unlike McAlpine, is no longer with us. People like you soon changed their minds about him did they not ??. Wally.
[quote][p][bold]Height of Sanity[/bold] wrote: Quite funny and orignal for Durham students, who on earth would be offended by this the joke is at the expense of a deceased child molester.[/p][/quote]Surely you should use the word "alleged", police evidence is one thing (remember the lies about Hillsborough) but Jimmy Saville, until proven guilty in a court of law, is to all intents and purposes, innocent. People like you would burn so called witches, 300 years ago, it's so easy to jump on the bandwaggon of mass hysteria. Saville, unlike McAlpine, is no longer with us. People like you soon changed their minds about him did they not ??. Wally. doonhamer

3:04pm Wed 28 Nov 12

doonhamer says...

Height of Sanity wrote:
Quite funny and orignal for Durham students, who on earth would be offended by this the joke is at the expense of a deceased child molester.
Surely you should use the word "alleged", police evidence is one thing (remember the lies about Hillsborough) but Jimmy Saville, until proven guilty in a court of law, is to all intents and purposes, innocent. People like you would burn so called witches, 300 years ago, it's so easy to jump on the bandwaggon of mass hysteria. Saville, unlike McAlpine, is no longer with us. People like you soon changed their minds about him did they not ??. Wally.
[quote][p][bold]Height of Sanity[/bold] wrote: Quite funny and orignal for Durham students, who on earth would be offended by this the joke is at the expense of a deceased child molester.[/p][/quote]Surely you should use the word "alleged", police evidence is one thing (remember the lies about Hillsborough) but Jimmy Saville, until proven guilty in a court of law, is to all intents and purposes, innocent. People like you would burn so called witches, 300 years ago, it's so easy to jump on the bandwaggon of mass hysteria. Saville, unlike McAlpine, is no longer with us. People like you soon changed their minds about him did they not ??. Wally. doonhamer

3:04pm Wed 28 Nov 12

doonhamer says...

Height of Sanity wrote:
Quite funny and orignal for Durham students, who on earth would be offended by this the joke is at the expense of a deceased child molester.
Surely you should use the word "alleged", police evidence is one thing (remember the lies about Hillsborough) but Jimmy Saville, until proven guilty in a court of law, is to all intents and purposes, innocent. People like you would burn so called witches, 300 years ago, it's so easy to jump on the bandwaggon of mass hysteria. Saville, unlike McAlpine, is no longer with us. People like you soon changed their minds about him did they not ??. Wally.
[quote][p][bold]Height of Sanity[/bold] wrote: Quite funny and orignal for Durham students, who on earth would be offended by this the joke is at the expense of a deceased child molester.[/p][/quote]Surely you should use the word "alleged", police evidence is one thing (remember the lies about Hillsborough) but Jimmy Saville, until proven guilty in a court of law, is to all intents and purposes, innocent. People like you would burn so called witches, 300 years ago, it's so easy to jump on the bandwaggon of mass hysteria. Saville, unlike McAlpine, is no longer with us. People like you soon changed their minds about him did they not ??. Wally. doonhamer

3:04pm Wed 28 Nov 12

doonhamer says...

Height of Sanity wrote:
Quite funny and orignal for Durham students, who on earth would be offended by this the joke is at the expense of a deceased child molester.
Surely you should use the word "alleged", police evidence is one thing (remember the lies about Hillsborough) but Jimmy Saville, until proven guilty in a court of law, is to all intents and purposes, innocent. People like you would burn so called witches, 300 years ago, it's so easy to jump on the bandwaggon of mass hysteria. Saville, unlike McAlpine, is no longer with us. People like you soon changed their minds about him did they not ??. Wally.
[quote][p][bold]Height of Sanity[/bold] wrote: Quite funny and orignal for Durham students, who on earth would be offended by this the joke is at the expense of a deceased child molester.[/p][/quote]Surely you should use the word "alleged", police evidence is one thing (remember the lies about Hillsborough) but Jimmy Saville, until proven guilty in a court of law, is to all intents and purposes, innocent. People like you would burn so called witches, 300 years ago, it's so easy to jump on the bandwaggon of mass hysteria. Saville, unlike McAlpine, is no longer with us. People like you soon changed their minds about him did they not ??. Wally. doonhamer

3:04pm Wed 28 Nov 12

doonhamer says...

Height of Sanity wrote:
Quite funny and orignal for Durham students, who on earth would be offended by this the joke is at the expense of a deceased child molester.
Surely you should use the word "alleged", police evidence is one thing (remember the lies about Hillsborough) but Jimmy Saville, until proven guilty in a court of law, is to all intents and purposes, innocent. People like you would burn so called witches, 300 years ago, it's so easy to jump on the bandwaggon of mass hysteria. Saville, unlike McAlpine, is no longer with us. People like you soon changed their minds about him did they not ??. Wally.
[quote][p][bold]Height of Sanity[/bold] wrote: Quite funny and orignal for Durham students, who on earth would be offended by this the joke is at the expense of a deceased child molester.[/p][/quote]Surely you should use the word "alleged", police evidence is one thing (remember the lies about Hillsborough) but Jimmy Saville, until proven guilty in a court of law, is to all intents and purposes, innocent. People like you would burn so called witches, 300 years ago, it's so easy to jump on the bandwaggon of mass hysteria. Saville, unlike McAlpine, is no longer with us. People like you soon changed their minds about him did they not ??. Wally. doonhamer

3:04pm Wed 28 Nov 12

doonhamer says...

Height of Sanity wrote:
Quite funny and orignal for Durham students, who on earth would be offended by this the joke is at the expense of a deceased child molester.
Surely you should use the word "alleged", police evidence is one thing (remember the lies about Hillsborough) but Jimmy Saville, until proven guilty in a court of law, is to all intents and purposes, innocent. People like you would burn so called witches, 300 years ago, it's so easy to jump on the bandwaggon of mass hysteria. Saville, unlike McAlpine, is no longer with us. People like you soon changed their minds about him did they not ??. Wally.
[quote][p][bold]Height of Sanity[/bold] wrote: Quite funny and orignal for Durham students, who on earth would be offended by this the joke is at the expense of a deceased child molester.[/p][/quote]Surely you should use the word "alleged", police evidence is one thing (remember the lies about Hillsborough) but Jimmy Saville, until proven guilty in a court of law, is to all intents and purposes, innocent. People like you would burn so called witches, 300 years ago, it's so easy to jump on the bandwaggon of mass hysteria. Saville, unlike McAlpine, is no longer with us. People like you soon changed their minds about him did they not ??. Wally. doonhamer

3:04pm Wed 28 Nov 12

doonhamer says...

Height of Sanity wrote:
Quite funny and orignal for Durham students, who on earth would be offended by this the joke is at the expense of a deceased child molester.
Surely you should use the word "alleged", police evidence is one thing (remember the lies about Hillsborough) but Jimmy Saville, until proven guilty in a court of law, is to all intents and purposes, innocent. People like you would burn so called witches, 300 years ago, it's so easy to jump on the bandwaggon of mass hysteria. Saville, unlike McAlpine, is no longer with us. People like you soon changed their minds about him did they not ??. Wally.
[quote][p][bold]Height of Sanity[/bold] wrote: Quite funny and orignal for Durham students, who on earth would be offended by this the joke is at the expense of a deceased child molester.[/p][/quote]Surely you should use the word "alleged", police evidence is one thing (remember the lies about Hillsborough) but Jimmy Saville, until proven guilty in a court of law, is to all intents and purposes, innocent. People like you would burn so called witches, 300 years ago, it's so easy to jump on the bandwaggon of mass hysteria. Saville, unlike McAlpine, is no longer with us. People like you soon changed their minds about him did they not ??. Wally. doonhamer

3:04pm Wed 28 Nov 12

doonhamer says...

Height of Sanity wrote:
Quite funny and orignal for Durham students, who on earth would be offended by this the joke is at the expense of a deceased child molester.
Surely you should use the word "alleged", police evidence is one thing (remember the lies about Hillsborough) but Jimmy Saville, until proven guilty in a court of law, is to all intents and purposes, innocent. People like you would burn so called witches, 300 years ago, it's so easy to jump on the bandwaggon of mass hysteria. Saville, unlike McAlpine, is no longer with us. People like you soon changed their minds about him did they not ??. Wally.
[quote][p][bold]Height of Sanity[/bold] wrote: Quite funny and orignal for Durham students, who on earth would be offended by this the joke is at the expense of a deceased child molester.[/p][/quote]Surely you should use the word "alleged", police evidence is one thing (remember the lies about Hillsborough) but Jimmy Saville, until proven guilty in a court of law, is to all intents and purposes, innocent. People like you would burn so called witches, 300 years ago, it's so easy to jump on the bandwaggon of mass hysteria. Saville, unlike McAlpine, is no longer with us. People like you soon changed their minds about him did they not ??. Wally. doonhamer

3:04pm Wed 28 Nov 12

doonhamer says...

Height of Sanity wrote:
Quite funny and orignal for Durham students, who on earth would be offended by this the joke is at the expense of a deceased child molester.
Surely you should use the word "alleged", police evidence is one thing (remember the lies about Hillsborough) but Jimmy Saville, until proven guilty in a court of law, is to all intents and purposes, innocent. People like you would burn so called witches, 300 years ago, it's so easy to jump on the bandwaggon of mass hysteria. Saville, unlike McAlpine, is no longer with us. People like you soon changed their minds about him did they not ??. Wally.
[quote][p][bold]Height of Sanity[/bold] wrote: Quite funny and orignal for Durham students, who on earth would be offended by this the joke is at the expense of a deceased child molester.[/p][/quote]Surely you should use the word "alleged", police evidence is one thing (remember the lies about Hillsborough) but Jimmy Saville, until proven guilty in a court of law, is to all intents and purposes, innocent. People like you would burn so called witches, 300 years ago, it's so easy to jump on the bandwaggon of mass hysteria. Saville, unlike McAlpine, is no longer with us. People like you soon changed their minds about him did they not ??. Wally. doonhamer

3:04pm Wed 28 Nov 12

doonhamer says...

Height of Sanity wrote:
Quite funny and orignal for Durham students, who on earth would be offended by this the joke is at the expense of a deceased child molester.
Surely you should use the word "alleged", police evidence is one thing (remember the lies about Hillsborough) but Jimmy Saville, until proven guilty in a court of law, is to all intents and purposes, innocent. People like you would burn so called witches, 300 years ago, it's so easy to jump on the bandwaggon of mass hysteria. Saville, unlike McAlpine, is no longer with us. People like you soon changed their minds about him did they not ??. Wally.
[quote][p][bold]Height of Sanity[/bold] wrote: Quite funny and orignal for Durham students, who on earth would be offended by this the joke is at the expense of a deceased child molester.[/p][/quote]Surely you should use the word "alleged", police evidence is one thing (remember the lies about Hillsborough) but Jimmy Saville, until proven guilty in a court of law, is to all intents and purposes, innocent. People like you would burn so called witches, 300 years ago, it's so easy to jump on the bandwaggon of mass hysteria. Saville, unlike McAlpine, is no longer with us. People like you soon changed their minds about him did they not ??. Wally. doonhamer

3:04pm Wed 28 Nov 12

doonhamer says...

Height of Sanity wrote:
Quite funny and orignal for Durham students, who on earth would be offended by this the joke is at the expense of a deceased child molester.
Surely you should use the word "alleged", police evidence is one thing (remember the lies about Hillsborough) but Jimmy Saville, until proven guilty in a court of law, is to all intents and purposes, innocent. People like you would burn so called witches, 300 years ago, it's so easy to jump on the bandwaggon of mass hysteria. Saville, unlike McAlpine, is no longer with us. People like you soon changed their minds about him did they not ??. Wally.
[quote][p][bold]Height of Sanity[/bold] wrote: Quite funny and orignal for Durham students, who on earth would be offended by this the joke is at the expense of a deceased child molester.[/p][/quote]Surely you should use the word "alleged", police evidence is one thing (remember the lies about Hillsborough) but Jimmy Saville, until proven guilty in a court of law, is to all intents and purposes, innocent. People like you would burn so called witches, 300 years ago, it's so easy to jump on the bandwaggon of mass hysteria. Saville, unlike McAlpine, is no longer with us. People like you soon changed their minds about him did they not ??. Wally. doonhamer

3:04pm Wed 28 Nov 12

doonhamer says...

Height of Sanity wrote:
Quite funny and orignal for Durham students, who on earth would be offended by this the joke is at the expense of a deceased child molester.
Surely you should use the word "alleged", police evidence is one thing (remember the lies about Hillsborough) but Jimmy Saville, until proven guilty in a court of law, is to all intents and purposes, innocent. People like you would burn so called witches, 300 years ago, it's so easy to jump on the bandwaggon of mass hysteria. Saville, unlike McAlpine, is no longer with us. People like you soon changed their minds about him did they not ??. Wally.
[quote][p][bold]Height of Sanity[/bold] wrote: Quite funny and orignal for Durham students, who on earth would be offended by this the joke is at the expense of a deceased child molester.[/p][/quote]Surely you should use the word "alleged", police evidence is one thing (remember the lies about Hillsborough) but Jimmy Saville, until proven guilty in a court of law, is to all intents and purposes, innocent. People like you would burn so called witches, 300 years ago, it's so easy to jump on the bandwaggon of mass hysteria. Saville, unlike McAlpine, is no longer with us. People like you soon changed their minds about him did they not ??. Wally. doonhamer

3:04pm Wed 28 Nov 12

doonhamer says...

Height of Sanity wrote:
Quite funny and orignal for Durham students, who on earth would be offended by this the joke is at the expense of a deceased child molester.
Surely you should use the word "alleged", police evidence is one thing (remember the lies about Hillsborough) but Jimmy Saville, until proven guilty in a court of law, is to all intents and purposes, innocent. People like you would burn so called witches, 300 years ago, it's so easy to jump on the bandwaggon of mass hysteria. Saville, unlike McAlpine, is no longer with us. People like you soon changed their minds about him did they not ??. Wally.
[quote][p][bold]Height of Sanity[/bold] wrote: Quite funny and orignal for Durham students, who on earth would be offended by this the joke is at the expense of a deceased child molester.[/p][/quote]Surely you should use the word "alleged", police evidence is one thing (remember the lies about Hillsborough) but Jimmy Saville, until proven guilty in a court of law, is to all intents and purposes, innocent. People like you would burn so called witches, 300 years ago, it's so easy to jump on the bandwaggon of mass hysteria. Saville, unlike McAlpine, is no longer with us. People like you soon changed their minds about him did they not ??. Wally. doonhamer

3:06pm Wed 28 Nov 12

doonhamer says...

Don't know what happened here !!!
Don't know what happened here !!! doonhamer

4:22pm Wed 28 Nov 12

timsinc says...

the ham(m)er of doon/m hacks the N.Echo with a stutter virus...
the ham(m)er of doon/m hacks the N.Echo with a stutter virus... timsinc

Comments are closed on this article.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree