Report this comment
  • "It has been stated by the Northern Echo that...
    "The law allows police, ambulance and fire service drivers to exceed the speed limit - but only in emergencies."

    Surely there must be a limit of exceedance though, irrespective of experience 140mph is a ridiculously dangerous speed."
  • This field is mandatory
  • This field is mandatory
  • Please note we will not accept reports with HTML tags or URLs in them.

  • Enter the above word in the box below

The 140mph policeman - and a decision that can't be justified

Today's front page

Today's front page

First published in Columnists
Last updated
The Northern Echo: Blog: Editor Peter Barron by

OUR exclusive story about how a North-East police officer drove at speeds of up to 140 mph to demonstrate the power of his car to a prisoner has caused quite a stir today.

The dominant - and understandable - question being asked by campaigners, readers and even serving police officers has been: "Why has the officer not been charged?"

This is a news story which is receiving significant national attention and it isn't going to go away quickly.

A statement has now been issued by Durham Police, defending the decision to limit its action to internal disciplinary measures rather than to charge the as yet unidentified Darlington officer with a criminal offence.

The key justifications for that decision are that the officer in question is "an advanced and highly-skilled police driver" and at no point was he driving dangerously.

I'm sorry but that does not excuse anyone from breaking the law. The police employ skilled drivers to drive at high speeds in appropriate circumstances - when a crime is being committed or public safety is at risk. They are not employed to drive at high speeds to show-off, commit a crime, and jeopardise public safety.

The police have to be whiter than white. Fighting crime relies on a trusted relationship between the police and the public and that cannot work on a "one rule for them and another for us" basis.

I accept the assurances that the officer has an exemplary record and that this was a one-off misjudgement, rather than a pattern of behaviour.

But anyone else who had driven on a public road at such excessive speeds would have been brought before the courts. And so should he.

Nigel Mansell was once banned for six months for driving in this country at 92mph. He was fairly advanced too.







Comments (3)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

Comments are closed on this article.

Send us your news, pictures and videos

Most read stories

Local Info

Enter your postcode, town or place name

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree